imy.

Channel
Free unsubs.
@BoomPalazeZz
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry
3subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 28 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001569620710 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @BoomPalazeZz |
| Description | CW // HASHWORD, CAPSLOCK, SPAM. If you uncomfortable / don't like my channel, just left. But don't forget to remove my acc from your channel, too. - @shuhuan_bot - @sadtober - @vamprez |
| Created | Between 1 August 2021 and 27 October 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 28 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 29 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/BoomPalazeZz |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 28 Aug 2026, 17:45 | 3 | no change |
| 28 Aug 2026, 17:31 | 3 | first reading |
Engagement
19 posts held, back to 27 October 2021 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 19 posts for this entry, the most recent from 21 December 2022. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
What this channel posts
- Photos
- 8
- Videos
- 6
- Links
- 4
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 28 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
- Video runtime
- 1m 03s
- Average length
- 16s
Measured directly from 4 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Recent posts
Photo, posted without a caption
Low Quality mode.
File, posted without a caption
𝐈𝐈. What Is Elegance to the Woman of Today If we take a look at elegance in the olden days, we would not wish things could be more like they once were. Learning about ourselves these days by stretching in the direction of goodness, of bigness, of kindness, of patience, of forgiveness, of bravery, and of delicateness in our choices - already marks the essence of elegance. dressing-with-sense-poise-and-timeless-style V…
Channel photo updated
Video, posted without a caption
However there are other ways that this can be accomplished successfully and without it being too costly as surgery—treatments like: body wraps, IPL, radio frequency, types of creams and oils. Medical aesthetics are a wonderful alternative to surgery. These aestheticians are beauty professionals who extended their education of the body and were trained in advanced treatments such as these. In proceeding articles, we’l…
"Beauty lies in the eyes of the beholder." Often said after asking if someone is beautiful. The real question is, what is true beauty? Every day we are surrounded by the world's perspective of beauty: blond hair, blue eyes, slim, tall, hourglass figure, just to name a few. Beautiful women come in all different shapes and sizes. I have a friend and she's GORGEOUS. She's from the Caribbean and she's always well put to…
wdyt abt Mia?
- omg freaking hot, naughty gurl i guess.25%
- intimidating, baddas gurl, uh so scared.23%
- pretty af, woman who know manners. honestly, you have a good vibes.35%
- seems friendly, humble, talkactive. wanna get closer.16%
Shares as published, totalling 99%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Video, posted without a caption
Photo, posted without a caption
Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @BoomPalazeZz. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Polls
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
wdyt abt Mia?
- omg freaking hot, naughty gurl i guess.25%
- intimidating, baddas gurl, uh so scared.23%
- pretty af, woman who know manners. honestly, you have a good vibes.35%
- seems friendly, humble, talkactive. wanna get closer.16%
Shares as published, totalling 99%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 27 October 2021 to 21 December 2022. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 28 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Free unsubs.” (@BoomPalazeZz), 3 subscribers as measured 28 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/BoomPalazeZz.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.