Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

Крипто Байтс

@BonuskNumbe

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

10,886subscribers

-78 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002521815789
TypeChannel
Username@BonuskNumbe
DescriptionТвой гид в мире криптовалют и блокчейна. Главные новости, аналитика рынка и свежие байты информации каждый день. Оставайся в курсе событий вместе с нами! 🚀
Created10 August 2025measured — dated from the channel’s first post
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live12 August 2026
Measurements held8
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 12 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/BonuskNumbe

Growth

10,88610,96410,9257 August 2026 — 10,964 subscribers7 August 2026 — 10,964 subscribers7 August 2026 — 10,959 subscribers8 August 2026 — 10,942 subscribers9 August 2026 — 10,931 subscribers11 August 2026 — 10,913 subscribers12 August 2026 — 10,902 subscribers12 August 2026 — 10,886 subscribers7 August 202612 August 2026
8 measurements spanning 5 days, net -78. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 10,874–10,976 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
12 Aug 2026, 22:1710,886-16
12 Aug 2026, 00:3310,902-11
11 Aug 2026, 00:1110,913-18
9 Aug 2026, 23:3110,931-11
8 Aug 2026, 20:2210,942-17
7 Aug 2026, 21:1610,959-5
7 Aug 2026, 18:0110,964no change
7 Aug 2026, 17:5210,964first reading

Engagement

22 posts held, back to 10 August 2025the reader has reached the start of this channel’s public history, so this is the full archive Telegram still exposes. Read across 15 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
0.326%
avg views ÷ 10,886 subscribers
Avg views / post
35.5
2 posts measured
Reaction rate
42.3%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
2
of 22 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 7 August 2026
Posts held22 (10 August 20257 August 2026)
Views total71
Reactions total30
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken13 Aug 2026, 04:36 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
8
Links
7

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 13 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Reaction mix

352 reactions across 17 posts, in 17 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 33.8% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
11933.8%
👍5615.9%
🔥5515.6%
🥰349.66%
😁298.24%
💯185.11%
👏123.41%
👀71.99%
👎51.42%
🍾30.852%
😘30.852%
😭30.852%
💔20.568%
💩20.568%
🤯20.568%
🤡10.284%
🤮10.284%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 17 of the 22 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 352reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 22 most recent posts we hold, published 10 August 2025 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

7 Aug 2026, 09:38 UTC37 views17 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Posted without readable text

👍7👎3💩2🥰21🤡1🤮1

8 Jun 2026, 01:18 UTC≈1,250 views15 reactionsread 13 August 2026

💎 Обновление Ethereum: что изменится для комиссий? Анализируем график и смотрим на долгосрок. Эфир готов к новому прыжку? 💰⏳

👀7🔥71

1 Apr 2026, 13:45 UTC≈3,350 views66 reactionsread 13 August 2026

Разбор слуха | шаблон 1) Утверждение Сформулируйте слух одним предложением. 2) Кто распространил / источник Где появилось впервые (аккаунт/канал)? Когда? Где дальше разошлось? 3) Что мы точно знаем Подтверждённые факты на данный момент (цифры, заявления, официальные данные). 4) Доказательства Что подтверждает: ссылки, первоисточники, скриншоты, цитаты. Что опровергает: официальное опровержение, несостыковки по вр

40😁20👍6

29 Mar 2026, 08:30 UTC≈2,430 views54 reactionsread 13 August 2026
Photo

🧾 Уровень доверия к новости ✅ Подтверждено - есть первоисточник (проект/биржа/регулятор), документ/tx/релиз и подтверждение минимум из 2 независимых медиа. 🟡 Вероятно - 1 надежный источник или несколько косвенных подтверждений (on-chain данные, скрин/цитата), но без официального релиза. 🔴 Не подтверждено - слухи, анонимные инсайды, "со слов", нет проверяемых материалов или есть признаки манипуляции. Как проверяем

🔥2718👍9

28 Mar 2026, 17:00 UTC≈1,850 views64 reactionsread 13 August 2026
Photo

Еженедельный дайджест: 5 крипто-утверждений, которые разлетелись на этой неделе 1) "SEC одобрила новый ETF" Статус: не подтверждено - нет официального заявления. 2) "Сегодня ночью крупный листинг монеты X на Binance" Статус: фейк - нет анонса биржи. 3) "Взлом кошелька/платформы и утечка данных" Статус: не подтверждено - нет техподробностей и независимых подтверждений. 4) "Официальное партнёрство с мировой компани

28🔥14🥰14👏8

26 Mar 2026, 15:30 UTC≈1,410 views51 reactionsread 13 August 2026
Photo

Тест для вас: "Новость или слух?" 1) Крупная биржа объявила о листинге нового L2-токена уже на этой неделе. 2) Один из крупнейших банков Европы запускает сервис хранения BTC для розницы. 3) Регулятор в Азии готовит запрет на стейблкоины, привязанные к доллару. Голосуем: 1 - новость / 2 - новость / 3 - новость. Если считаете, что это слух - напишите: 1 - слух, 2 - слух, 3 - слух. Ответы опубликуем в комментариях

👍22🥰14😁9😘32👏1

25 Mar 2026, 09:00 UTC≈1,070 views1 reactionsread 13 August 2026
Photo

Разбор кейса: "слух об листинге/партнёрстве" ✅ Что считается подтверждением (официально) Доверяем только если есть: - пост на сайте/в блоге биржи или компании - анонс в их верифицированных аккаунтах (X/Telegram) - страница рынка/пары + точное время - пресс-релиз или filing (для публичных компаний) ⚠️ Что НЕ подтверждение - "инсайдер", скрины, репост-каналы - статьи без ссылки на первоисточник - "скоро" без даты/стр

🔥1

24 Mar 2026, 16:01 UTC≈1,050 views2 reactionsread 13 August 2026
Photo

Инструмент/хак: как найти "оригинальное заявление"/первоисточник криптопроекта? 1) Офиц. сайт: Blog/Docs/Whitepaper. 2) GitHub: переходи только по ссылке с сайта; смотри README, Releases, Tags. 3) Вериф. аккаунты (X/Telegram/Discord): совпадение ссылок и @. 4) Контракт: адрес из сайта/Docs сверить в explorer. 5) Заархивируй ссылку через Wayback (если изменят - будет след). Примеры источников: CoinMarketCap https://

2

23 Mar 2026, 10:30 UTC≈1,020 views1 reactionsread 13 August 2026

Разбор слуха | шаблон 1) Утверждение Сформулируйте слух одним предложением. 2) Кто распространил / источник Где появилось впервые (аккаунт/канал)? Когда? Где дальше разошлось? 3) Что мы точно знаем Подтверждённые факты на данный момент (цифры, заявления, официальные данные). 4) Доказательства Что подтверждает: ссылки, первоисточники, скриншоты, цитаты. Что опровергает: официальное опровержение, несостыковки по вр

1

22 Mar 2026, 08:00 UTC≈1,310 viewsread 13 August 2026
Photo

Быстрая методика проверки крипто-новостей (до любых действий) 1) Первоисточник - Кто сообщил первым? - Ищи: официальный X/блог, сайт, GitHub, docs, объявление биржи, SEC/регулятор. - Нет ссылки на оригинал = риск слуха. 2) Тайминг - Новость свежая или "перезалив"? - Сверь время публикации, часовой пояс и движение цены. - Рывок ДО новости может быть утечкой/манипуляцией. 3) Верификация - Нужны ≥2 независимых подтве

22 Mar 2026, 03:33 UTC≈1,330 views1 reactionsread 13 August 2026

Будущее принадлежит тем, кто понимает технологии. Интернет, цифровые активы и новые проекты меняют правила игры. Не бойтесь начинать с малого. Каждый большой успех начинается с первого шага. Ваше цифровое будущее начинается сегодня.

1

Showing the 12 most recent of 22 posts we hold for @BonuskNumbe. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 782,041 of 1,169,250entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Крипто Байтс” (@BonuskNumbe), 10,886 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/BonuskNumbe.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.