https://youtu.be/R_FSueAT9X0 чуваки, порадуйте классами! а я за вас помолюсь 🫶🏿
🔥91❤41👍19🥰9👏3🍌2😍2🌭1

Channel
@BonoMachan
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry
6,112subscribers
+107 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002031005706 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @BonoMachan |
| Description | ого |
| Created | Between 1 November 2023 and 31 May 2024 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 5 November 2026 |
| Measurements held | 21 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 5 November 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/BonoMachan |
Gaming — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 12 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 86% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 5 Nov 2026, 12:19 | 6,112 | -2 |
| 30 Oct 2026, 13:06 | 6,114 | -3 |
| 27 Oct 2026, 11:17 | 6,117 | +16 |
| 24 Oct 2026, 14:27 | 6,101 | +47 |
| 21 Oct 2026, 09:56 | 6,054 | +8 |
| 18 Oct 2026, 18:01 | 6,046 | -5 |
| 15 Oct 2026, 09:40 | 6,051 | +12 |
| 12 Oct 2026, 01:21 | 6,039 | +5 |
| 5 Oct 2026, 06:18 | 6,034 | +16 |
| 26 Sept 2026, 23:21 | 6,018 | +7 |
| 14 Sept 2026, 05:39 | 6,011 | -6 |
| 10 Sept 2026, 14:58 | 6,017 | -3 |
| 5 Sept 2026, 15:57 | 6,020 | -7 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 09:03 | 6,027 | +3 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 14:27 | 6,024 | -3 |
| 23 Aug 2026, 06:13 | 6,027 | +8 |
| 16 Aug 2026, 17:58 | 6,019 | +4 |
| 13 Aug 2026, 09:46 | 6,015 | +8 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 19:15 | 6,007 | +1 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 00:58 | 6,006 | first reading |
28 posts held, back to 1 June 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 12 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 21 October 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 28 (1 June 2026 – 21 October 2026) |
| Views total | 3,360 |
| Reactions total | 170 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 5 Nov 2026, 16:49 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 5 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
3,568 reactions across 28 posts, in 44 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 45.7% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 1,629 | 45.7% | |
| 👍 | 334 | 9.36% | |
| 🍌 | 289 | 8.10% | |
| 🔥 | 282 | 7.90% | |
| ❤🔥 | 199 | 5.58% | |
| 👀 | 76 | 2.13% | |
| 🤣 | 68 | 1.91% | |
| 😭 | 66 | 1.85% | |
| 👎 | 57 | 1.60% | |
| 🤝 | 56 | 1.57% | |
| 🥰 | 52 | 1.46% | |
| ✍ | 51 | 1.43% | |
| 🎉 | 44 | 1.23% | |
| 🌭 | 41 | 1.15% | |
| 😁 | 35 | 0.981% | |
| 😢 | 33 | 0.925% | |
| 🫡 | 29 | 0.813% | |
| 🤡 | 25 | 0.701% | |
| 😐 | 22 | 0.617% | |
| 💅 | 18 | 0.504% | |
| 24 further kinds | 162 | 4.54% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 28 of the 28 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 3,568 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 28 most recent posts we hold, published 1 June 2026 to 21 October 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 0 of 1 post held from the last 30 days (0%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).
https://youtu.be/R_FSueAT9X0 чуваки, порадуйте классами! а я за вас помолюсь 🫶🏿
🔥91❤41👍19🥰9👏3🍌2😍2🌭1
Фортуна решительно улыбается мне в последнее время: дропнулась еще одна реклама! Кайф, куплю себе кримсон балдезерт как раз. Ролик (ЧАСОВОЙ) уже готов, и пока я разбираюсь с интеграцией, заценить его уже можно на бусти в раннем доступе👇 На ютубе через пару дней, думаю, выйдет. https://boosty.to/bono_machan/posts/ef30c544-0bf5-4bca-9413-a75f481c91b4?share=post_link
🥰40❤25👏9❤🔥3🍌3🤨2🌭1👀1
Кримсон дезерт я, как и многие, ждал и собирался браться за нее безотлагательно. Однако первые отзывы были разгромными. Долгое время ее практически никто (из неймовых лиц) от души не лайкал. Я доверился общественному мнению и денег пожалел. Теперь же разработчикам респектуют даже те, кто в их игре так и не нашел для себя ничего привлекательного. В "убийцу скайрима" едва ли не ежесекундно вливают патчи и нововведения…
❤🔥38👍14❤10🍌6🌭1💯1🔥1🤓1
опять я чуть-чуть увлекся, поэтому подождать придется подольше обычного 👨🏿💻
❤93🔥23❤🔥12🍌10🌭4💘1💯1
ПЕРСОНЩИКИ и ФОРТНАЙТЕРЫ! Ребята, которые приобщили меня к персоне, замутили в фортнайте такой вот НЕРЕАЛЬНЫЙ прикол. Говорят, там даже на меня микро-отсылочка есть, так что надо проверить!
❤39🔥6🌭2💯2🍌1💩1
Video, posted without a caption
👀42🖕14🤣6❤5🍌5🗿5❤🔥1🌭1
все и так в курсе уже, но я тоже хочу пукнуть по теме: второй мортал шелл - АХУЙ ☠️ прохожу его, если че, с запретом на все эти приблуды, которые упрощают игру, и сокращенными в два раза дедлайнами. онимуша, кстати, тоже АХУЙ будет по идее. вы слышали, че там за дубляж? ☠️ из плохого: хардмод закрыт, это мне уже сообщили. надо волонтера подготавливать к работе 👀
🍌49💘8❤7🔥5🌭2🕊2👍1
Итак, сериал, обещающий продолжаться года полтора, снова у вас в ленте. Как обычно - для бустеров на 3 дня раньше. https://boosty.to/bono_machan/posts/0fbe2826-e21b-44dd-9952-233c3812b166?share=post_link Бг3 вне всяких сомнений побьет рекорд по количеству роликов. Выпускать их я планирую через один, если только вас оно не заебет. Не забывайте по пальчику вверх тыкать усердно, чтобы я понял, что пока не надоело.
❤🔥80👍58❤13👎6🍌4🌭2🔥2🥴2
⚡️Надо бы вот такую статью в кодекс добавить: "Если у игрока нет возможности получить доступ к скрытому уровню сложности, он имеет право играть на том харде, который ему доступен. Но в таком случае наградные дедлайны сокращаются вдвое". Нормалды? Просто хочу вот я, например, в метаформу поиграть - а там есть скрытая сложность. Ну и кто мне будет проходить жрпг на сто сорок часов, чтобы сложность открыть? Гемор. Поэто…
👍104👎34❤18🤝6🤔5🖕4🍌2🔥2
https://youtu.be/jj2Z1Eq4_UE 🔥 Новый видос. Долго не выходил, хотя короткий относительно получился. В чем проблема? Ну, мне просто рекламка капнула, просили подождать с выходом. (Радость-то какая, первая реклама за последние полгода, так, глядишь, и богатым стану 😀) Пока этот ролик простаивал и ждал своего часа, вовсю клеился новый, так что следующая пуля вылетит гораздо быстрее, чем вы думаете, меньше чем через не…
❤108🍌11👍5👎3🌭1👏1🔥1
Posted without readable text
😢31❤19🍌14🤡4🌭3👀3💯3🤓3
Вторая серия бесконечных врат балдура уже в раннем доступе на бусти, тем временем приключения темного соблазна я пока ставлю на паузу и берусь монтировать один из долгов... Продолжение "этого" просят уже очень давно - и настала пора порадовать ждунов! бг3 же, судя по всему, реально будет шизанутым рекордсменом по количеству частей. в связи с чем вопрос: я все правильно делаю? в смысле - мне сохранять текущий темп по…
🤝49🔥21❤11🌭4🆒3🍌2
Showing the 12 most recent of 28 posts we hold for @BonoMachan. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Судьба предлагаемой поправки:
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 28 most recent posts we hold, published 1 June 2026 to 21 October 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 5 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Bono Machan” (@BonoMachan), 6,112 subscribers as measured 5 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/BonoMachan.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.