Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

[rest.] цереС 😳,

@Boneyart

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

35subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 9 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1003915872975
TypeChannel
Username@Boneyart
Descriptionесли заходите активничайте пж!!
CreatedBetween 1 April 2026 and 31 July 2026— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded11 August 2026
Last confirmed live11 August 2026
Measurements held2
On Telegramt.me/Boneyart

Growth

359 Aug 2026, 19:48 — 35 subscribers11 Aug 2026, 00:01 — 35 subscribers9 Aug 2026, 19:4811 Aug 2026, 00:01
2 measurements spanning 1 day. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 34–36 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
11 Aug 2026, 00:0135no change
9 Aug 2026, 19:4835first reading

Engagement

19 posts held, back to 1 August 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
98.6%
avg views ÷ 35 subscribers
Avg views / post
34.5
18 posts measured
Reaction rate
11.2%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
19
of 19 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 13 of 18 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 9 August 2026
Posts held19 (1 August 20269 August 2026)
Views total621
Reactions total50
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken11 Aug 2026, 00:01 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
139
Videos
3
Links
19

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 11 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Video runtime
19s
Average length
10s

Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

50 reactions across 13 posts, in 11 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 30.0% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
1530.0%
🍓714.0%
custom 5890891230962785422510.0%
💔510.0%
😭510.0%
🦄510.0%
custom 532568033374243751136.00%
❤‍🔥24.00%
custom 526728592402627769912.00%
🆒12.00%
💘12.00%

Custom emoji. 3 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 13 of the 19 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 50reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 1 August 2026 to 9 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

9 Aug 2026, 17:31 UTC23 viewsread 11 August 2026

. Это ужасно я уже рыдаю взахлеб из-за него...

9 Aug 2026, 17:30 UTC23 views6 reactionsread 11 August 2026

. Максимальный РЕПОСТ!!! В арткм появился чел который сначала просит у художников нарисовать коммишку довольно сложную! Но потом сливается. Он не оплачивает предоплату с предлогом что у него больная свинья Вот его юз Если он вам напишет игнорьте а лучше заблокируйте

🦄2custom 53256803337424375112custom 58908912309627854222

7 Aug 2026, 21:59 UTC26 views1 reactionsread 11 August 2026

. Я не определилась с хумкой

🦄1

7 Aug 2026, 21:59 UTC26 views4 reactionsread 11 August 2026
Photo

. Это че за новый перс в дв

2🍓1🦄1

6 Aug 2026, 09:58 UTC37 views13 reactionsread 11 August 2026
Photo

. Мне лень это в ибис переводить так что пусть вот такбудет #sketch

4🍓3❤‍🔥2💘1🆒1custom 53256803337424375111custom 58908912309627854221

5 Aug 2026, 20:02 UTC30 views2 reactionsread 11 August 2026

. Уменя щп есть крутой кстати https://t.me/+RBUmdes7L1diMDhi Ходят слухи что церес разучилась рисовать

1🦄1

5 Aug 2026, 08:50 UTC35 viewsread 11 August 2026

. За эти 3 недели я несколько раз отправлялась в рест и это такой плзор

4 Aug 2026, 22:05 UTC38 views2 reactionsread 11 August 2026

. Блин а че рисовать у меня идей нет

2

4 Aug 2026, 21:58 UTC38 views1 reactionsread 11 August 2026

. Лан я нарисую что-то мне полегчало Лпа новое мнение переобуваемся

1

4 Aug 2026, 21:58 UTC32 views2 reactionsread 11 August 2026

Автор представляет себя как Церес (28.01, афаб) и описывает себя замкнутой в начале общения, но болтливой при раскрепощении, а также склонной к односложным ответам и игнорированию в периоды грусти или высокой занятости. Указаны любимые персонажи (Крис, Тест Тьюб, Том, Эйпи и др.), список триггеров (бывшие друзья, ненавистники, темы о прошлом) и нежелательное поведение (разговоры только о себе, агрессия), а также типо

2

3 Aug 2026, 18:19 UTC36 views7 reactionsread 11 August 2026

. Mге не становится лучше

💔5😭1custom 52672859240262776991

Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @Boneyart. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 456,565 of 1,183,361entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“[rest.] цереС 😳,” (@Boneyart), 35 subscribers as measured 11 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Boneyart.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.