Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for ๐‘จ๐’„๐’•๐’“๐’†๐’”๐’” ๐‘ฎ๐’‚๐’๐’‚๐’™๐’š ๐‘ท๐’‚๐’“๐’‚๐’…๐’Š๐’”๐’†๐Ÿฅตโค๏ธโ€๐Ÿ”ฅ

Channel

๐‘จ๐’„๐’•๐’“๐’†๐’”๐’” ๐‘ฎ๐’‚๐’๐’‚๐’™๐’š ๐‘ท๐’‚๐’“๐’‚๐’…๐’Š๐’”๐’†๐Ÿฅตโค๏ธโ€๐Ÿ”ฅ

@BollywoodQueensHD

On this record: Growth ยท Engagement ยท What this channel posts ยท Reactions ยท Posts ยท Citations ยท Cite this entry

9,497subscribers

+151 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register ยท movement among entries of 3,162โ€“10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002173850744
TypeChannel
Username@BollywoodQueensHD
DescriptionPremium Photo n Video Edit ๐Ÿฅต Only 18+๐Ÿ‘€๐Ÿ”ž Our Queensโคโ€๐Ÿ”ฅ All your favourite Celebrities๐Ÿฅต๐Ÿ‘‡๐Ÿป Bollywood๐Ÿ’ƒ๐Ÿป Thankyou @ActressChannelsHub for launching me โ˜บ๏ธ๐Ÿ™ˆ
CreatedBetween 1 June 2024 and 30 September 2024โ€” estimated from Telegramโ€™s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live13 August 2026
Measurements held4
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 13 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/BollywoodQueensHD

Growth

9,3469,4989,4227 August 2026 โ€” 9,346 subscribers7 August 2026 โ€” 9,347 subscribers10 August 2026 โ€” 9,498 subscribers13 August 2026 โ€” 9,497 subscribers9,4977 August 202613 August 2026
4 measurements spanning 6 days, net +151. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between โ€” snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean โ€œno change observedโ€, never โ€œinterpolatedโ€. The vertical axis spans 9,323โ€“9,521 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log โ€” every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
13 Aug 2026, 05:459,497-1
10 Aug 2026, 09:339,498+151
7 Aug 2026, 08:489,347+1
7 Aug 2026, 06:469,346first reading

Engagement

7 posts held, back to 26 April 2026 โ€” the reader has not yet reached the start of this channelโ€™s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 16 pagesof Telegramโ€™s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR ยท 30 days
24.8%
avg views รท 9,497 subscribers
Avg views / post
2,360
2 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.32%
reactions รท views ยท ER floor
Posts in window
2
of 7 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) รท viewsโ€” note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegramโ€™s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days ยท latest post in window 10 August 2026
Posts held7 (26 April 2026 โ€“ 10 August 2026)
Views total4,710
Reactions total62
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface โ€” not measured, not estimated
Readings taken15 Aug 2026, 20:57 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than โ€œcorrectingโ€ the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form โ€” 8.12K, 3.7M โ€” so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded โ€” read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
โ‰ˆ2,950
Videos
โ‰ˆ252
Links
โ‰ˆ76

Lifetime counters from Telegramโ€™s own channel header, read 15 August 2026 โ€” not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked โ‰ˆ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it โ€” t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so โ‰ˆ142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Reaction mix

441 reactions across 7 posts, in 14 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 32.0% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
โคโ€๐Ÿ”ฅ14132.0%
๐Ÿ”ฅ11927.0%
๐Ÿ’‹6815.4%
customย 5470079659674731941245.44%
๐Ÿ˜173.85%
๐Ÿฅฐ163.63%
๐Ÿ’˜143.17%
โšก112.49%
๐Ÿ‘81.81%
๐Ÿคฉ81.81%
๐Ÿ˜˜61.36%
๐Ÿ‘€40.907%
๐Ÿ™ˆ30.68%
๐Ÿฅด20.454%

Custom emoji. One row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id โ€” no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The count beside it isTelegramโ€™s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities โ€” ๐Ÿ™ is thanks in one channel and mourning in another โ€” so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one โ€” 4.34K, 1.2M โ€” so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 7 of the 7 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegramโ€™s own count on each post โ€” not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above โ€” those same posts carry 441reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by โ€œa reaction total printed elsewhere on the pageโ€.

Measured over the 7 most recent posts we hold, published 26 April 2026 to 10 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

10 Aug 2026, 05:31 UTCโ‰ˆ2,430 views35 reactionsread 15 August 2026
Photo

๐Ÿ’— Pink Beauty Rashi Singh Stunning Visuals | Gorgeous Latest Photos ๐Ÿ’“ โ™ก โŽ™ โŒฒ ๏ผฒฮžฮ”๏ผฃ๏ผด โœง ๏ผณฮ”๏ผถฮž โœง ๏ผณะฝฮ”ะฏฮž

๐Ÿ”ฅ13โคโ€๐Ÿ”ฅ9๐Ÿ’˜5๐Ÿฅฐ5๐Ÿ™ˆ2๐Ÿ’‹1

10 Aug 2026, 05:31 UTCโ‰ˆ2,280 views27 reactionsread 15 August 2026
Photo

#karishmaktanna ๐Ÿ’ฃ๐Ÿ’ฃ โ™ก โŽ™ โŒฒ ๏ผฒฮžฮ”๏ผฃ๏ผด โœง ๏ผณฮ”๏ผถฮž โœง ๏ผณะฝฮ”ะฏฮž

๐Ÿ”ฅ8๐Ÿ˜6โคโ€๐Ÿ”ฅ5๐Ÿ‘3โšก2๐Ÿ’‹2๐Ÿคฉ1

4 Jul 2026, 16:24 UTCโ‰ˆ12,300 views108 reactionsread 15 August 2026
Photo

#Jyothirai โค๏ธโ€๐Ÿ”ฅ๐Ÿฅต โ™ก โŽ™ โŒฒ ๏ผฒฮžฮ”๏ผฃ๏ผด โœง ๏ผณฮ”๏ผถฮž โœง ๏ผณะฝฮ”ะฏฮž

โคโ€๐Ÿ”ฅ40๐Ÿ’‹25๐Ÿ”ฅ21๐Ÿคฉ7๐Ÿ’˜4๐Ÿ‘€3๐Ÿ‘3๐Ÿฅฐ2

4 Jul 2026, 16:24 UTCโ‰ˆ10,500 views57 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Photo

#MrunalThakur โœจ๐Ÿ˜ โ™ก โŽ™ โŒฒ ๏ผฒฮžฮ”๏ผฃ๏ผด โœง ๏ผณฮ”๏ผถฮž โœง ๏ผณะฝฮ”ะฏฮž

โคโ€๐Ÿ”ฅ25๐Ÿ”ฅ12โšก7๐Ÿ’˜4๐Ÿ˜˜4๐Ÿฅฐ3๐Ÿ‘€1๐Ÿ’‹1

25 May 2026, 03:06 UTCโ‰ˆ19,800 views91 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Photo

Kushitha ๐Ÿ‘๐Ÿฅต โ™ก โŽ™ โŒฒ ๏ผฒฮžฮ”๏ผฃ๏ผด โœง ๏ผณฮ”๏ผถฮž โœง ๏ผณะฝฮ”ะฏฮž

โคโ€๐Ÿ”ฅ37๐Ÿ”ฅ25customย 547007965967473194111๐Ÿ˜9๐Ÿ’‹6๐Ÿ‘2๐Ÿ’˜1

25 May 2026, 03:06 UTCโ‰ˆ16,800 views55 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Photo

Symran Kaur ๐Ÿ’“๐Ÿ’“ โ™ก โŽ™ โŒฒ ๏ผฒฮžฮ”๏ผฃ๏ผด โœง ๏ผณฮ”๏ผถฮž โœง ๏ผณะฝฮ”ะฏฮž

โคโ€๐Ÿ”ฅ20๐Ÿ’‹13๐Ÿ”ฅ13customย 54700796596747319415โšก2๐Ÿ˜˜1๐Ÿ™ˆ1

26 Apr 2026, 03:10 UTCโ‰ˆ19,400 views68 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Photo

Nikita Sharma ๐Ÿ˜ป๐Ÿฅต โ™ก โŽ™ โŒฒ ๏ผฒฮžฮ”๏ผฃ๏ผด โœง ๏ผณฮ”๏ผถฮž โœง ๏ผณะฝฮ”ะฏฮž

๐Ÿ”ฅ27๐Ÿ’‹20customย 54700796596747319418๐Ÿฅฐ6โคโ€๐Ÿ”ฅ5๐Ÿฅด2

Showing the 7 most recent of 7 posts we hold for @BollywoodQueensHD. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked โ‰ˆ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it โ€” t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so โ‰ˆ1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank โ€” 129,203 of 1,481,217entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below โ€” republished posts weigh more than named mentions โ€” and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channelโ€™s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page โ€” a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Mentions

Named by 6 registered channels โ€” every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched โ€” that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting todayโ€™s namer to yesterdayโ€™s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason โ€” naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides โ€” the โ€œNamed by N registered channelsโ€ figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 August 2026 โ€” this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

โ€œ๐‘จ๐’„๐’•๐’“๐’†๐’”๐’” ๐‘ฎ๐’‚๐’๐’‚๐’™๐’š ๐‘ท๐’‚๐’“๐’‚๐’…๐’Š๐’”๐’†๐Ÿฅตโค๏ธโ€๐Ÿ”ฅโ€ (@BollywoodQueensHD), 9,497 subscribers as measured 13 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/BollywoodQueensHD.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV ยท JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.