Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Boleznen | Канал 🍏

Channel

Boleznen | Канал 🍏

@BoleznenChannel

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

1,106subscribers

+72 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002247990350
TypeChannel
Username@BoleznenChannel
CreatedBetween 1 May 2024 and 31 October 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded8 August 2026
Last confirmed live17 August 2026
Measurements held5
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 17 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/BoleznenChannel

Growth

1,0281,1061,0677 August 2026 — 1,034 subscribers8 August 2026 — 1,034 subscribers10 August 2026 — 1,033 subscribers14 August 2026 — 1,028 subscribers17 August 2026 — 1,106 subscribers7 August 202617 August 2026
5 measurements spanning 10 days, net +72. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 1,016–1,118 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
17 Aug 2026, 12:121,106+78
14 Aug 2026, 01:041,028-5
10 Aug 2026, 16:531,033-1
8 Aug 2026, 00:201,034no change
7 Aug 2026, 14:371,034first reading

Engagement

19 posts held, back to 4 August 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
10.5%
avg views ÷ 1,106 subscribers
Avg views / post
117
19 posts measured
Reaction rate
9.03%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
19
of 19 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 7 August 2026
Posts held19 (4 August 20267 August 2026)
Views total2,214
Reactions total200
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken8 Aug 2026, 00:20 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

200 reactions across 19 posts, in 11 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 34.0% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
6834.0%
💘3718.5%
🤬3316.5%
💔2211.0%
199.50%
🤯73.50%
🏆52.50%
🎃42.00%
🆒21.00%
💯21.00%
👀10.5%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 19 of the 19 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 200reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 4 August 2026 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

7 Aug 2026, 22:54 UTC18 views4 reactionsread 8 August 2026

84 квартал, УРА! 06:49, дали свет, наконец-то нахуй 🥳 Включаю кампуктер Берём все свои банки и заряжаем их до 100%, кто их знает, что они там ещё учудят.

2🏆1🆒1

7 Aug 2026, 20:49 UTC28 views4 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

бля это пиздец, нахуй я туда зашёл вообще, бедные дети

🤯2🎃1👀1

7 Aug 2026, 20:43 UTC28 views6 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

В какую погоду бл, клоуны, нормальная погода на улице + это их работа, им за это деньги платят, не за спасибо же там всё чинят + как я понял, сами и повредили, рукожопы 🤣 Да и что они там сделали-то в итоге за почти сутки? Нихуя не изменилось 😄 Рад, что в комментариях под тем постом не все долбоёбы.

🤬31💘1💯1

7 Aug 2026, 20:16 UTC36 views7 reactionsread 8 August 2026

ебать ну это нихуя себе пхахах, я дома от прожектора сижу телефон заряжаю, было бы здорово спать, спать прямо до включения света, всё равно на работу не надо, выходные, но увы, я выспался

💘322

7 Aug 2026, 19:55 UTC39 views8 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Время 4 утра, со скуки пошёл помыл посуду, приготовил покушать, помыл посуду, покушал, помыл посуду, сижу, без света в одиночку скучно пиздец, уже даже в шахматы сам с собой играл, так никто и не выиграл

💘422

7 Aug 2026, 18:26 UTC47 views8 reactionsread 8 August 2026

А интернет в итоге мобильный нихуя и не работает, вспомнил почему не платил, время 2 часа ночи, света так и нет, три холодильника в квартире уже давно растаяли 👍 Я почему такой злой - с водой когда хуйня происходит они предупреждают за две недели, с газом если, то за пол года, а как свет, так хуй вам, а не информация и не звоните сюда больше 🤣

💘42💔2

7 Aug 2026, 14:00 UTC82 views10 reactionsread 8 August 2026

12 часов ± без электричества сижу, пидарасы ебаные, пришлось за симку заплатить, за которую пол года не платил, лишь бы иметь возможность выйти в интернет

3💘32💔2

7 Aug 2026, 04:59 UTC111 views11 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Чуть чуть нихуя не согласен, второй раз выключают свет в 84 квартале за несколько дней, что в тот раз, что в этот - номер +73955670508 и +73955675030 недоступны, каждую попытку - линия занята, по этому номеру +73955523140 посылают нахуй и отвечают не с первого раза, в итоге - жди ёпта, опять работы, опять объём работы большой. Сроки не дают, об отключении не предупреждают, а как бороться с отсутствием света там, где

53💘3

6 Aug 2026, 16:09 UTC121 views9 reactionsread 8 August 2026

да ало твари вышли с роблокса нахуй, из-за нагрузки на их сервер поиграть не могу нормально лучше на сервере моём поиграйте https://t.me/DistortionProject/535

3💔3🤬3

6 Aug 2026, 14:41 UTC124 views12 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Я за «единоросов» и Путина не голосовал ни разу в жизни и голосовать не буду, не совпадают с моими политическими взглядами и предпочтениями и запомните, если вы не интересуетесь политикой - она интересуется вами. А что до «Яблока»? Не знаю, крайне слабая и тихая оппозиция, мне «КПРФ» ближе, проблему с СВО это не решит ни «Яблоко», ни «КПРФ», но это будет уже хоть какой-то толчок вперёд — увидеть на «престоле» новую

5💘4🏆3

6 Aug 2026, 13:51 UTC125 views12 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

ахахахахахах

🎃3💘32🤬2🤯2

Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @BoleznenChannel. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 314,880 of 1,548,671entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 17 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Boleznen | Канал 🍏” (@BoleznenChannel), 1,106 subscribers as measured 17 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/BoleznenChannel.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.