Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

داستان های بهلول دانا

@Bohlloolhakim

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

4,527subscribers

-12 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001370479383
TypeChannel
Username@Bohlloolhakim
CreatedBetween 1 March 2018 and 30 June 2021— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live13 August 2026
Measurements held5
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 13 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/Bohlloolhakim

Growth

4,5274,5394,5336 August 2026 — 4,539 subscribers6 August 2026 — 4,539 subscribers7 August 2026 — 4,535 subscribers10 August 2026 — 4,534 subscribers13 August 2026 — 4,527 subscribers6 August 202613 August 2026
5 measurements spanning 7 days, net -12. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 4,525–4,541 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
13 Aug 2026, 05:064,527-7
10 Aug 2026, 12:174,534-1
7 Aug 2026, 02:244,535-4
6 Aug 2026, 05:154,539no change
6 Aug 2026, 05:084,539first reading

Engagement

25 posts held, back to 22 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 7 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
16.4%
avg views ÷ 4,527 subscribers
Avg views / post
741
25 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.15%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
25
of 25 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 11 August 2026
Posts held25 (22 July 202611 August 2026)
Views total18,531
Reactions total214
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken12 Aug 2026, 07:00 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

200 reactions across 24 posts, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 55.0% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
11055.0%
👍4020.0%
👏3316.5%
💯84.00%
😢52.50%
👎21.00%
🤔21.00%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 25 of the 25 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 214reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 25 most recent posts we hold, published 22 July 2026 to 11 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

11 Aug 2026, 00:45 UTC197 views9 reactionsread 12 August 2026

آرزو می‌کنم ناخواسته بدست بیاوری آنچه که بی‌صدا از قلبت گذر کرده، و آنگاه شگفت‌زده با خود بی‌اندیشی کسی برایم دعا کرده بود؟!

9

10 Aug 2026, 18:04 UTC229 views11 reactionsread 12 August 2026

یسری چیزها مهم‌تر از عشقه، مهمه که چطوری باهات حرف میزنه وقتی عصبیه، مهمه چطوری برخورد میکنه وقتی تو اشتباه کردی، مهمه چطوری مرهم برات میشه وقتی حالت بده مهمه، مهمه چطوری مسائل رو حل میکنه وقتی اختلاف نظر دارین، مهمه چطوری بهت واکنش میده وقتی به خودت رسیدی، مهمه چطوری بهت توجه میکنه وقتی سرش شلوغه، همه این چطوری‌ها مهمه و جمله دوست دارم به تنهایی کافی نیست‌.

💯83

9 Aug 2026, 09:09 UTC322 views7 reactionsread 12 August 2026

اگر خودتان را مصرف کنید، دیگران هم آرام آرام شما را مصرف خواهند کرد. در مصرف شدنِ شما، دیگران هیچ نقشی ندارند. آدمها آنگونه که شما با خودتان رفتار میکنید با شما رفتار خواهند کرد. غمِ شئ شدن، از عمیق‌ترین غم‌های جهان است و راه‌حلی جز تغییرِ نگرش خودتان نسبت به خودتان ندارد.

👍7

7 Aug 2026, 20:49 UTC424 views9 reactionsread 12 August 2026

آدمای امن ، آدمایی هستن که همه چيز مي‌تونی بهشون بگی بدون اينکه قضاوت يا تحقيرت کنند. میتونی کنارشون فقط خودِ خودت باشی ، همچنین اونا هم سعی نمیکنن خودشونو جلوی تو طوری نشون بدن که نیستن. خیالت راحته که از حرفایی که بهشون میزنی بعدها سواستفاده نمیشه یا به دیگران منتقل نمیشه. حالت اگه خوب نباشه متوجه میشن و البته واسشون مهمه و تلاش میکنن حالتو بهتر کنن به علاقمندی هات احترام میذارن و روی رفتارهایی که ممکنه ناراحتت کنه

9

6 Aug 2026, 09:38 UTC527 views7 reactionsread 12 August 2026

یه بار یه نفر بهم یه نصیحتی کرد که: اگر دلت می‌خواد بری بدوئی، برو. منتظر پیدا کردن همراه نباش. دیر یا زود، شاید بار پنجم، شاید بار بیستم، آدم‌هایی که مثل خودت فکر می‌کنن، خودشون سر راهت قرار می‌گیرن. تازه چند وقت پیش فهمیدم این حرف فقط درباره دوئیدن نیست؛ تقریباً برای همه‌چیز توی زندگی صدق می‌کنه.

👍51🤔1

5 Aug 2026, 14:28 UTC576 views7 reactionsread 12 August 2026

ازدواج کردن دستاورد نیست، اما توانایی ساختن و حفظ یک رابطه‌ی واقعی و سالم، موفقیته. پولدار شدن دستاورد نیست، اما ثروتی که با خودش آرامش، آسایش و اخلاق به همراه بیاره، موفقیته. مدرک گرفتن دستاورد نیست، اما توانایی فکر کردن، یاد گرفتن و تاثیرگذار بودن، موفقیته. مهاجرت کردن دستاورد نیست، اما ساختن زندگی‌ای که در آن احساس تعلق و شادی داشته باشی، موفقیته. بچه‌دار شدن دستاورد نیست، اما پرورش دادن انسانی سالم، شاد و متعادل،

👏7

4 Aug 2026, 07:39 UTC643 views5 reactionsread 12 August 2026

‏اتفاقا خانواده خیلی مهمه، رفتارش تو خیابون مهمه، نوع حرف زدنش مهمه، الویت هاش دادنش مهمه، رفتارش با حیوون ها مهمه، دوستای دورش مهمه، اینکه با کسی که براش منفعتی نداره چطور رفتار میکنه مهمه، کنترل موقع عصبانیتش مهمه، شخصیت هر کسی از همین جزئیات شروع میشه، همه ی جزئیات یه آدم مهمه.

5

3 Aug 2026, 12:57 UTC669 views9 reactionsread 12 August 2026

و سلام بر کسانی که وقتی در تاریکیِ وجود خود غرق شده بودیم، تنها شمع‌شان را برای ما روشن کردند.

9

3 Aug 2026, 10:51 UTC702 views6 reactionsread 12 August 2026

برای صمیمیت از دست رفته هیچ غلطی نمیشه کرد؛ بیخودی دست و پا نزنید.

👍6

2 Aug 2026, 13:44 UTC806 views9 reactionsread 12 August 2026

گاهی لازم نیست چیزی را نجات بدهی، توضیح بدهی، یا به سرانجام برسانی. بعضی فصل‌های زندگی فقط آمده‌اند تا به تو یاد بدهند همه‌چیز قرار نیست مالِ تو باشد، اما هر چیزی می‌تواند چیزی از تو بسازد...

9

1 Aug 2026, 08:53 UTC862 views11 reactionsread 12 August 2026

برای پرنده اهمیتی نداره که کسی به آوازش گوش میده یا نه ، اصلا حضور شنونده براش مهم نیست و برای بدست آوردن چیزی آواز نمیخونه اینکارو فقط برای شور و نشاط خودش انجام میده .. بدون شک راه درست زندگی کردن همینه..

👏11

31 Jul 2026, 11:11 UTC871 views10 reactionsread 12 August 2026

«در محفلی که خورشید اندر شمار ذره‌ست خود را بزرگ دیدن شرط ادب نباشد.» حافظ شیرازی؛ اشعار منتسب.

10

Showing the 12 most recent of 25 posts we hold for @Bohlloolhakim. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 1,016,478 of 1,189,255entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Mentions

Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“داستان های بهلول دانا” (@Bohlloolhakim), 4,527 subscribers as measured 13 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Bohlloolhakim.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.