Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for BODMAXTIPS๐Ÿ€๐Ÿ’ฅ

Channel

BODMAXTIPS๐Ÿ€๐Ÿ’ฅ

@BodmaxFTX

On this record: Topic ยท Growth ยท Engagement ยท What this channel posts ยท Reactions ยท Posts ยท Citations ยท Telegram's recommendations ยท Cite this entry

15,853subscribers

-540 since we began measuring on 14 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register ยท movement among entries of 10,000โ€“31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001643047085
TypeChannel
Username@BodmaxFTX
DescriptionStake what you can afford to LOSE, Nothing is sure in Betting ๐Ÿ‘Œ
CreatedBetween 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023 โ€” estimated from Telegramโ€™s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded14 August 2026
Last confirmed live11 November 2026
Measurements held57
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 11 November 2026
On Telegramt.me/BodmaxFTX

Topic

Gambling & betting โ€” a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channelโ€™s own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a modelโ€™s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured โ€” it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.

Growth

15,80016,46516,132.514 August 2026 โ€” 16,393 subscribers15 August 2026 โ€” 16,414 subscribers16 August 2026 โ€” 16,451 subscribers17 August 2026 โ€” 16,465 subscribers18 August 2026 โ€” 16,455 subscribers19 August 2026 โ€” 16,445 subscribers20 August 2026 โ€” 16,435 subscribers21 August 2026 โ€” 16,437 subscribers23 August 2026 โ€” 16,421 subscribers24 August 2026 โ€” 16,409 subscribers25 August 2026 โ€” 16,393 subscribers26 August 2026 โ€” 16,374 subscribers27 August 2026 โ€” 16,357 subscribers28 August 2026 โ€” 16,348 subscribers30 August 2026 โ€” 16,367 subscribers31 August 2026 โ€” 16,354 subscribers31 August 2026 โ€” 16,337 subscribers2 September 2026 โ€” 16,355 subscribers3 September 2026 โ€” 16,378 subscribers4 September 2026 โ€” 16,362 subscribers7 September 2026 โ€” 16,324 subscribers10 September 2026 โ€” 16,318 subscribers12 September 2026 โ€” 16,308 subscribers14 September 2026 โ€” 16,295 subscribers15 September 2026 โ€” 16,261 subscribers17 September 2026 โ€” 16,234 subscribers26 September 2026 โ€” 16,144 subscribers4 October 2026 โ€” 16,053 subscribers9 October 2026 โ€” 15,982 subscribers13 October 2026 โ€” 15,952 subscribers14 October 2026 โ€” 15,923 subscribers15 October 2026 โ€” 15,915 subscribers16 October 2026 โ€” 15,913 subscribers17 October 2026 โ€” 15,901 subscribers18 October 2026 โ€” 15,888 subscribers19 October 2026 โ€” 15,875 subscribers20 October 2026 โ€” 15,863 subscribers21 October 2026 โ€” 15,843 subscribers23 October 2026 โ€” 15,831 subscribers24 October 2026 โ€” 15,817 subscribers25 October 2026 โ€” 15,806 subscribers26 October 2026 โ€” 15,805 subscribers27 October 2026 โ€” 15,803 subscribers28 October 2026 โ€” 15,800 subscribers29 October 2026 โ€” 15,899 subscribers30 October 2026 โ€” 15,916 subscribers31 October 2026 โ€” 15,921 subscribers1 November 2026 โ€” 15,912 subscribers2 November 2026 โ€” 15,903 subscribers3 November 2026 โ€” 15,900 subscribers4 November 2026 โ€” 15,894 subscribers5 November 2026 โ€” 15,869 subscribers6 November 2026 โ€” 15,861 subscribers7 November 2026 โ€” 15,846 subscribers8 November 2026 โ€” 15,830 subscribers9 November 2026 โ€” 15,868 subscribers11 November 2026 โ€” 15,853 subscribers15,85314 August 202611 November 2026
57 measurements spanning 89 days, net -540. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between โ€” snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean โ€œno change observedโ€, never โ€œinterpolatedโ€. The vertical axis spans 15,700โ€“16,565 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log โ€” every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 57
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
11 Nov 2026, 13:1915,853-15
9 Nov 2026, 19:2615,868+38
8 Nov 2026, 12:1915,830-16
7 Nov 2026, 07:4915,846-15
6 Nov 2026, 09:4915,861-8
5 Nov 2026, 07:3615,869-25
4 Nov 2026, 04:0015,894-6
3 Nov 2026, 01:3515,900-3
2 Nov 2026, 02:5715,903-9
1 Nov 2026, 02:3915,912-9
31 Oct 2026, 05:3015,921+5
30 Oct 2026, 03:0115,916+17
29 Oct 2026, 06:1815,899+99
28 Oct 2026, 07:1115,800-3
27 Oct 2026, 05:3015,803-2
26 Oct 2026, 05:5615,805-1
25 Oct 2026, 03:2015,806-11
24 Oct 2026, 02:1615,817-14
23 Oct 2026, 00:0615,831-12
21 Oct 2026, 22:3815,843first reading

Engagement

454 posts held, back to 12 August 2026 โ€” the reader has not yet reached the start of this channelโ€™s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 57 pages of Telegramโ€™s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR ยท 30 days
11.6%
avg views รท 15,853 subscribers
Avg views / post
1,840
166 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.74%
reactions รท views ยท ER floor
Posts in window
166
of 454 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) รท views โ€” note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegramโ€™s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 159 of 166 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days ยท latest post in window 13 November 2026
Posts held454 (12 August 2026 โ€“ 13 November 2026)
Views total305,710
Reactions total2,182
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface โ€” not measured, not estimated
Readings taken13 Nov 2026, 06:50 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than โ€œcorrectingโ€ the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form โ€” 8.12K, 3.7M โ€” so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded โ€” read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
โ‰ˆ12,000
Videos
โ‰ˆ143
Links
โ‰ˆ1,970

Lifetime counters from Telegramโ€™s own channel header, read 13 November 2026 โ€” not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked โ‰ˆ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it โ€” t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so โ‰ˆ142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Video runtime
2m 15s
Average length
23s

Measured directly from 6 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel โ€” not this channelโ€™s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegramโ€™s own rounded chrome, so it carries no โ‰ˆ mark.

Reaction mix

8,405 reactions across 438 posts, in 33 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 64.5% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
โค5,41964.5%
๐Ÿ™6617.86%
๐Ÿ‘5816.91%
๐Ÿ˜4174.96%
๐Ÿคฃ2502.97%
๐Ÿ‘2162.57%
๐Ÿ’”1301.55%
๐Ÿ˜ข1281.52%
๐Ÿ˜ญ1141.36%
๐Ÿฅฐ1011.20%
๐Ÿค”780.928%
๐Ÿ”ฅ610.726%
๐Ÿคฏ480.571%
๐Ÿพ310.369%
๐Ÿ†250.297%
๐Ÿ’ฏ230.274%
๐Ÿ•Š140.167%
๐Ÿคฎ140.167%
โšก130.155%
๐ŸŽ‰130.155%
13 further kinds680.809%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities โ€” ๐Ÿ™ is thanks in one channel and mourning in another โ€” so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one โ€” 4.34K, 1.2M โ€” so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 441 of the 454 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegramโ€™s own count on each post โ€” not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above โ€” those same posts carry 8,405 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by โ€œa reaction total printed elsewhere on the pageโ€.

Measured over the 454 most recent posts we hold, published 12 August 2026 to 13 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

Telegramโ€™s own โ€˜editedโ€™ marker: 11 of 166 posts held from the last 30 days (6.63%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before โ€” this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).

13 Nov 2026, 06:36 UTC264 views3 reactionsread 13 November 2026

This have been settled, congrats if you rebet ๐Ÿค๐ŸŽ‰

โค3

Signed BODMAX

13 Nov 2026, 06:03 UTC456 views2 reactionsread 13 November 2026
Video

Video, posted without a caption

๐Ÿ‘2

Signed BODMAX

12 Nov 2026, 22:20 UTCโ‰ˆ1,290 views11 reactionsread 13 November 2026
Photo

This match dey hold 4/4 rebet of first code ๐Ÿ™

โค10๐Ÿ˜1

Signed BODMAX

12 Nov 2026, 21:25 UTCโ‰ˆ1,480 views5 reactionsread 13 November 2026

France ๐Ÿ˜ข๐Ÿ˜ซ

โค4๐Ÿ˜1

Signed BODMAX

12 Nov 2026, 20:42 UTCโ‰ˆ1,690 views73 reactionsread 13 November 2026

Will Never be Broke in my Life again ๐Ÿ™ Today makes it Exactly 4 YEARS now ๐Ÿค” Someone covered my face from behind at Idumota market, Lagos Island and asked me to guess who she was. She promised to give me 500k if I could guess correctly After guessing incorrectly for about 10mins, she wanted to remove her hands as i couldn't guess rightly. But I insisted that she should not remove her hands because I needed to winโ€ฆ

๐Ÿ˜41๐Ÿคฃ13๐Ÿ˜ข9โค7๐Ÿ™ˆ2โšก1

Signed BODMAX

12 Nov 2026, 20:20 UTCโ‰ˆ1,650 views41 reactionsread 13 November 2026
Photo

NCAA ๐Ÿ€ College Boys ๐Ÿ™๐Ÿ˜ซ๐Ÿ˜ญ NXCW2CEB

โค26๐Ÿ‘9๐Ÿ”ฅ6

Signed BODMAX

12 Nov 2026, 19:59 UTCโ‰ˆ1,650 views7 reactionsread 13 November 2026

Chai, the equalizer should have been from Baracas ๐Ÿ˜ญ๐Ÿ˜ญ not River plate

โค7

Signed BODMAX

12 Nov 2026, 19:55 UTCโ‰ˆ1,670 views4 reactionsread 13 November 2026

Fuck ๐Ÿ˜ซ ๐Ÿ˜ซ ๐Ÿ˜ซ ๐Ÿ˜ซ ๐Ÿ˜ซ

โค4

Signed BODMAX

12 Nov 2026, 19:51 UTCโ‰ˆ1,690 views3 reactionsread 13 November 2026

Oya Baracas please 1-1 too ๐Ÿ˜ฉ๐Ÿ™

โค3

Signed BODMAX

12 Nov 2026, 19:50 UTCโ‰ˆ1,660 views5 reactionsread 13 November 2026

River plate penalty but we need baracas equalizer more ๐Ÿ™

๐Ÿ™5

Signed BODMAX

12 Nov 2026, 19:46 UTCโ‰ˆ1,630 views8 reactionsread 13 November 2026

Make Baracas score of River plate can't score You just score abeg ๐Ÿ™

๐Ÿ™4โค2๐Ÿ‘2

Signed BODMAX

12 Nov 2026, 19:33 UTCโ‰ˆ1,620 views13 reactionsread 13 November 2026

Baracas and River plate Give us a goal each ๐Ÿ™

๐Ÿ™10โค3

Signed BODMAX

Showing the 12 most recent of 454 posts we hold for @BodmaxFTX. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked โ‰ˆ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it โ€” t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so โ‰ˆ1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason โ€” naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides โ€” the โ€œNamed by N registered channelsโ€ figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegramโ€™s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly โ€” each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone elseโ€™s query is independent of having been queried itself.

โ‚ฆ200 to win โ‚ฆ200M
@jaredad ยท 48,517
Telegram ranks this channel #18 of 90 here โ€” alongside 89 others โ€” read 29 August 2026
Lekan Markโšฝ๏ธ ๐Ÿฅ… ๐Ÿ€ ๐Ÿ’ฅ๐Ÿ’ฅ๐Ÿ’ฅ Sport betting expert...
@lekanMark ยท 32,762
Telegram ranks this channel #25 of 80 here โ€” alongside 79 others โ€” read 5 September 2026
๐•พแดœแด„แด„แด‡ssแดแด€ษด ๐—™ส€แด‡แด‡ ๐—งษชแด˜s โผ (๐”—๐”ฅ๐”ข ๐”ฏ๐”ข๐”ž๐”ฉ ๐”ฐ๐”ฌ๐”ฒ๐”ฏ๐” ๐”ข)โ„ขโšฝ๏ธ๐Ÿ€๐Ÿ”žโšก๏ธ
@Successman4492 ยท 43,651
Telegram ranks this channel #28 of 79 here โ€” alongside 78 others โ€” read 30 August 2026
SPIDER WIN
@AAAAAFgGFjabH3uhzVSMRQ ยท 31,966
Telegram ranks this channel #30 of 86 here โ€” alongside 85 others โ€” read 4 September 2026
DR ZEH MILLIONS ๐Ÿซถ๐Ÿ’š
@winningtips599 ยท 41,599
Telegram ranks this channel #33 of 88 here โ€” alongside 87 others โ€” read 30 August 2026
SUZANNE TIPS
@SuzanneTips ยท 47,191
Telegram ranks this channel #43 of 88 here โ€” alongside 87 others โ€” read 26 August 2026
Teniola tips ๐Ÿ€โšฝ๏ธ๐ŸŽพ
@cocoteni12 ยท 46,095
Telegram ranks this channel #44 of 87 here โ€” alongside 86 others โ€” read 14 September 2026
gameboyboy
@gameboyboy ยท 1
Telegram ranks this channel #47 of 87 here โ€” alongside 86 others โ€” read 14 August 2026
Talented Tips๐Ÿ’ช๐Ÿ€โšฝ๏ธ
@talentedfbggang ยท 74,639
Telegram ranks this channel #58 of 86 here โ€” alongside 85 others โ€” read 19 August 2026
Berryโ€™s Free Channel
@BERRYNWA1 ยท 21,774
Telegram ranks this channel #63 of 91 here โ€” alongside 90 others โ€” read 20 September 2026

This channel appears in 10 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegramโ€™s list for THAT channel, not this one โ€” see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 November 2026 โ€” this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

โ€œBODMAXTIPS๐Ÿ€๐Ÿ’ฅโ€ (@BodmaxFTX), 15,853 subscribers as measured 11 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/BodmaxFTX.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV ยท JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.