Вот тоже 1 из приоритетных была! Вот на ней видно, сколько лучше стало понимание рисунка
❤29💘12🔥6👀1

Channel
@BluBare
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
1,095subscribers
+5 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
| Telegram ID | -1002110679794 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @BluBare |
| Created | Between 1 November 2023 and 31 May 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 13 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 5 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 13 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/BluBare |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 13 Aug 2026, 04:15 | 1,095 | +2 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 13:06 | 1,093 | +1 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 00:05 | 1,092 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 22:37 | 1,092 | +2 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 14:47 | 1,090 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 4 June 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 10 July 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
541 reactions across 20 posts, in 18 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 57.5% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 311 | 57.5% | |
| ❤🔥 | 38 | 7.02% | |
| 🥰 | 36 | 6.65% | |
| 🔥 | 30 | 5.55% | |
| 🤝 | 20 | 3.70% | |
| 💘 | 18 | 3.33% | |
| 👀 | 16 | 2.96% | |
| 👍 | 16 | 2.96% | |
| 😢 | 13 | 2.40% | |
| 🫡 | 12 | 2.22% | |
| 🌭 | 10 | 1.85% | |
| 🤨 | 6 | 1.11% | |
| 😱 | 5 | 0.924% | |
| 👏 | 3 | 0.555% | |
| 🤩 | 2 | 0.37% | |
| 🤪 | 2 | 0.37% | |
| 🤷♂ | 2 | 0.37% | |
| 😭 | 1 | 0.185% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 541reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 4 June 2026 to 10 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Вот тоже 1 из приоритетных была! Вот на ней видно, сколько лучше стало понимание рисунка
❤29💘12🔥6👀1
Я кстати думаю ремейкнуть те арты с чертихами. Думаю скилл чуть вырос для допила и изменения уже ремастерднутых версий. Вот по быстрому 1 из самых любимых чертих перерисовал
❤21💘6🔥3
Потом общий пос сделаю с ссылками на прочие штуки и потру нсфв страшилки) чтож поделать, добро пожаловать в Твиттере и прочие места
🫡12🔥2
Ну ладно, пох! Буду выкладывать тогда на фа и Твиттер. А сюда онли эротику и пин-ап условный
😢10❤2
А чем там опять за паника у художников с постингом нсфв контента?
❤11🤷♂2
Я НАШЕЛ! Даже папка с бекапами есть. Как найду время - доделаю. Там фон нужно подставить по сути и микро фиксы внести
❤🔥30❤6
мне еще по хорошему ьы закончить прошлые скетчи, у меня же там ворох недоделанных!
❤10🤪2
Скоро буду опять по немногу скетчить + наверное брать простые заказы от 1косарика. Вот и думайте... Надо оно вам или нет)
👀15
это кстати очень опасная тема! Я в детстве видел передачу "1000 способов умереть" и там мужик помер от того, что залил себе в сраку алкоголь. Он то ли на лечении был, то ли еще чо, нельзя было ему пить напиток любимый вкусный! И вот он решил такой чудесный прикол провернуть, по итогу умер! Вот такие вот дела, друзья. Стоит задуматься!
🤝20👏3😢1
Остальные скетчи оставлю наверное без цвета, некогда) Но если соберете 70 луйкоф, то сделаю)
🥰24❤20👍6
Разлеглась пьяница
❤26🔥10😱3
доделал 1 скетч
❤25🥰12🌭10👍3😱1
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @BluBare. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“BlueBarrel 18+” (@BluBare), 1,095 subscribers as measured 13 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/BluBare.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.