Channel
Blood_lymph_System
@Blood_lymph
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
2,114subscribers
+165 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001923863631 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @Blood_lymph |
| Created | Between 1 April 2023 and 31 October 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 19 September 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 19 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 12 |
| On Telegram | t.me/Blood_lymph |
Topic
Education — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 19 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 65% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 19 Sept 2026, 21:59 | 2,114 | no change |
| 15 Sept 2026, 19:57 | 2,114 | +25 |
| 11 Sept 2026, 17:15 | 2,089 | +130 |
| 6 Sept 2026, 18:55 | 1,959 | +2 |
| 2 Sept 2026, 09:23 | 1,957 | -1 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 00:27 | 1,958 | +4 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 06:16 | 1,954 | -2 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 04:25 | 1,956 | +4 |
| 20 Aug 2026, 17:57 | 1,952 | -1 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 02:37 | 1,953 | +2 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 23:17 | 1,951 | +2 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 18:14 | 1,949 | first reading |
Engagement
Posts not read yet. This entry is on the register from its profile alone; the post reader has not reached it. Engagement figures appear here once posts have actually been measured — we do not publish a rate before we have the readings behind it.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
@physiology_yaqob · 33,582
Telegram ranks this channel #5 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 4 September 2026
@easymedicine7 · 29,375
Telegram ranks this channel #20 of 73 here — alongside 72 others — read 8 September 2026
@skills_first · 42,535
Telegram ranks this channel #22 of 73 here — alongside 72 others — read 29 August 2026
@Osmosis_Premium · 22,734
Telegram ranks this channel #43 of 77 here — alongside 76 others — read 20 September 2026
@pharmacology2017 · 32,164
Telegram ranks this channel #43 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 5 September 2026
This channel appears in 5 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 19 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Blood_lymph_System” (@Blood_lymph), 2,114 subscribers as measured 19 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Blood_lymph.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.