10 Feb 2020, 02:43 UTCviews —
The account of the user that created this channel has been inactive for the last 5 months. If it remains inactive in the next 7 days, that account will self-destruct and this channel will no longer have a creator.
Channel
Blockchain Consultation
@BlockchainConsultation
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
18subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 11 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001277096035 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @BlockchainConsultation |
| Description | We do Blockchain Consultation. A brand new channel that aims to provide you insight into the various projects in the blockchain world and to help you formulate strategies. For inquiries: @ProfessorBlockchain |
| Created | 5 March 2018 — measured — dated from the channel’s first post |
| First recorded | 11 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 4 October 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/BlockchainConsultation |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 11 Aug 2026, 20:00 | 18 | no change |
| 11 Aug 2026, 19:47 | 18 | first reading |
Engagement
18 posts held, back to 5 March 2018 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 18 posts for this entry, the most recent from 10 February 2020. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
What this channel posts
- Links
- 11
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 11 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Recent posts
6 Feb 2020, 16:09 UTCviews —
The account of the user that created this channel has been inactive for the last 5 months. If it remains inactive in the next 10 days, that account will self-destruct and this channel will no longer have a creator.
24 Apr 2018, 21:41 UTC187 viewsread 11 August 2026
Today we were searching for a coin with a low market cap! We came across Matryx Check out the whitepaper below There seems to be a good team behind this project, but here are in my opinion four other reasons why this project is one with a potential. 1️⃣. The market cap is extremely low. This means this coin is hugely undervalued and still out of media attention focus. What does it means? Yes, exactly. Perfect ti…
16 Apr 2018, 14:35 UTC206 viewsread 11 August 2026
📄 Today we are going review Ontology ($4,07, market cap $982.150.788 USD) Despite the fact that the market wasn’t showing many green signs the last weeks, Ontology was performing increasingly well. A good reason to get in to it. First of all what is Ontology? Ontology is launched by the Chinese company Onchain in 2017. Ontology is a blockchain platform for decentralized trust systems in corporations. They aim to pr…
10 Apr 2018, 20:38 UTC170 viewsread 11 August 2026
Cryptocurrency exchange Gemini will roll out block trading for bitcoin and ether starting later this week. The feature - which will allow customers to make high-volume trades that won't appear in the exchange's order book until they've been filled - will go live at 9:30 a.m. ET on Thursday, Gemini explained in a blog post. There's a minimum threshold of 10 bitcoin or 100 ether for the block trades, meaning that smal…
6 Apr 2018, 15:49 UTC173 viewsread 11 August 2026
💵 How to Mount a Tax Defense for Unreported Crypto Income Deadline for cryptotaxes in America is coming up! Make sure to arrange it before the 17th of april. As you might know, there are rules when it comes to crypto-tax. Read the article below for some further information about what to do and what you shouldn’t do when it comes to crypto-tax. https://www.coindesk.com/mount-tax-defense-unreported-crypto-income/
4 Apr 2018, 23:05 UTC153 viewsread 11 August 2026
📑 As reported, there is a login issue at Binance and it has created more fears about a possible hack (or other liquidity fears) sparking FUD-driven selling pressure across the crypto space. The entire crypto space is back in the red for the week… Be aware that login issues are not immediately hacker attacks. Binance is working on it. Just hold your tokens for the moment.
26 Mar 2018, 14:04 UTC≈1,650 viewsread 11 August 2026
46%+ of ICO's fail! 😱 Which ICO’s do you choose and why? Be curious about the projects behind the ICO’s! According to a recent study, 418 of the 902 (46%) new crowd sales listed on tokendata for 2017 have already failed. 142 of them failed during the ICO stage. 276 failed post-ICO. Keep in mind that these are only the projects which are already failed. At the moment there are 113 ICO’s that deemed to be ‘unrespons…
21 Mar 2018, 22:13 UTC212 viewsread 11 August 2026
Project of the week: Aeternity ($1,73USD) By looking for a low capped project to add to the portfolio, I came across Aeternity and realized I didn’t know much about it. Aeternity is a blockchain platform with smart contracts interfacing with real world data. They aim to be leading on the next three elements: 1. State channels: The state channels provide a possibility to execute smart contracts off chain. In case o…
20 Mar 2018, 12:58 UTC644 viewsread 11 August 2026
🤔 This is what each G20 country thinks about cryptocurrency With the G20 going on there's a lot of interest from investors and countries as to what will be the general stance towards cryptocurrencies in the coming year(s). We found a nice reddit post where a user took the time to do a write up on what each country in the G20 has to say about cryptocurrencies. A very interesting, concise read for every crypto enthusi…
18 Mar 2018, 21:50 UTC≈1,450 viewsread 11 August 2026
❗️Breaking: (G20) -FSB rejects the call for cryptocurrency regulation As you might know the G20 summit starts monday and it certainly seems to have filled the market with even more uncertainty as one of the topics that will be discussed monday are cryptocurrencies. The FSB just took its stance towards reviewing existing rules instead of focusing on new ones. A relief rebound in BTC is already underway, taking the co…
14 Mar 2018, 11:28 UTC4 viewsread 11 August 2026
❗️ Google to ban all crypto and ICO advertising from June on Google announced it wil stop displaying ads for cryptocurrency or Initial Coin Offerings. It will be particularly interesting to see how new ICO’s will react. At the present, they use Google a lot for promoting their crowdsale and they will need to find an alternative one way or the other. Or might this be yet another step to the de-hyping of ICO’s? https…
Showing the 12 most recent of 18 posts we hold for @BlockchainConsultation. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Mentions
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Handles this channel named that no longer answer
- Dead references
- 3
- handles named in this channel’s posts, vacant today
- Evidenced gone
- 0
- we ourselves saw one of these resolve, at some point
- Never seen alive
- 3
- vacant every time we have ever looked
@BlockchainConsultation named 3 handles that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all. A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
Never seen alive
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
@coinoffering
named in 1 post, 12 August 2026 – 12 August 2026
named in 1 post, 12 August 2026 – 12 August 2026
@cryptostrategies
named in 1 post, 12 August 2026 – 12 August 2026
named in 1 post, 12 August 2026 – 12 August 2026
@harvardofcrypto
named in 1 post, 12 August 2026 – 12 August 2026
named in 1 post, 12 August 2026 – 12 August 2026
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Blockchain Consultation” (@BlockchainConsultation), 18 subscribers as measured 11 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/BlockchainConsultation.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.