Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

๐—•๐—น๐—ฎ๐—ฐ๐—ธ ๐—ง๐—ถ๐—ด๐—ฒ๐—ฟ ๐—–๐—ฎ๐—น๐—น๐˜€

@BlackTigerCalls

On this record: Growth ยท Engagement ยท Reactions ยท Posts ยท Citations ยท Handles named that no longer answer ยท Cite this entry

2,540subscribers

-95 since we began measuring on 11 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register ยท movement among entries of 1,000โ€“3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001640309830
TypeChannel
Username@BlackTigerCalls
CreatedBetween 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023โ€” estimated from Telegramโ€™s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded11 August 2026
Last confirmed live15 August 2026
Measurements held3
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 15 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/BlackTigerCalls

Growth

2,5402,6352,587.511 August 2026 โ€” 2,635 subscribers12 August 2026 โ€” 2,629 subscribers15 August 2026 โ€” 2,540 subscribers11 August 202615 August 2026
3 measurements spanning 4 days, net -95. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between โ€” snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean โ€œno change observedโ€, never โ€œinterpolatedโ€. The vertical axis spans 2,526โ€“2,649 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log โ€” every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
15 Aug 2026, 20:142,540-89
12 Aug 2026, 15:142,629-6
11 Aug 2026, 20:002,635first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 10 March 2026 โ€” the reader has not yet reached the start of this channelโ€™s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegramโ€™s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR ยท 30 days
60.8%
avg views รท 2,540 subscribers
Avg views / post
1,540
3 posts measured
Reaction rate
14.5%
reactions รท views ยท ER floor
Posts in window
3
of 20 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) รท viewsโ€” note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegramโ€™s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 1 of 3 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days ยท latest post in window 11 August 2026
Posts held20 (10 March 2026 โ€“ 11 August 2026)
Views total4,634
Reactions total34
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface โ€” not measured, not estimated
Readings taken11 Aug 2026, 20:00 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than โ€œcorrectingโ€ the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form โ€” 8.12K, 3.7M โ€” so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded โ€” read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

1,846 reactions across 8 posts, in 11 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 17.9% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
๐Ÿ‘33017.9%
๐Ÿ”ฅ32417.6%
โค29616.0%
๐Ÿฅฐ22512.2%
โคโ€๐Ÿ”ฅ22011.9%
๐Ÿ’ฏ21711.8%
๐Ÿ˜21311.5%
๐Ÿ’‹90.488%
๐Ÿ•Š50.271%
๐Ÿ“40.217%
๐Ÿพ30.163%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities โ€” ๐Ÿ™ is thanks in one channel and mourning in another โ€” so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one โ€” 4.34K, 1.2M โ€” so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 8 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegramโ€™s own count on each post โ€” not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above โ€” those same posts carry 1,846reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by โ€œa reaction total printed elsewhere on the pageโ€.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 10 March 2026 to 11 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

11 Aug 2026, 10:36 UTCโ‰ˆ4,260 viewsread 11 August 2026
Photo

๐Ÿ”ฅโœ… RWA INC ($RWAINC) โ€“ Bringing Real-World Assets On-Chain The financial world is entering a new era where ownership, liquidity, and investment opportunities are no longer limited by borders or large capital requirements. ๐ŸŒ RWA INC ($RWAINC) is building the bridge between traditional assets and blockchain technology, creating a future where real-world assets can become more accessible, transparent, and efficient thโ€ฆ

7 Aug 2026, 15:29 UTC234 views34 reactionsread 11 August 2026
Photo

โ€‹๐Ÿš€ RWA INC.: AI TOKENIZATION & $300M MEGA DEAL! ๐ŸŒ Bridging TradFi & Web3 with our AI-Powered Tokenization Engine! Real-World Assets & Global Equities (Tesla, Microsoft, Nvidia) are going instant and compliant on-chain. โ€‹๐Ÿ’ก Key Highlights: โ€‹๐Ÿค– AI-Driven System: Automated KYC, Smart Contracts & instant investor matching. โ€‹โšก $300M Advisory Deal: Signed with Golden Dolphin for Chinese New-Energy Infrastructure. โ€‹๐Ÿ“ˆ 100โ€ฆ

๐Ÿ‘14๐Ÿ”ฅ11โค9

28 Jul 2026, 10:23 UTC140 viewsread 11 August 2026
Photo

RWA INC โ€” CEX & DEX Lending Pools Powering Liquidity and Rewarding Participation. Our liquidity program strengthens market depth across CEX and DEX platforms while rewarding lenders and supporters of the $RWAINC ecosystem with up to 35% in rewards. The goal is simple: support liquidity across centralized and decentralized markets. Lend $RWAINC or stablecoins and receive rewards distributed based on pool terms and paโ€ฆ

8 Jun 2026, 10:37 UTCviews โ€”

๐—•๐—น๐—ฎ๐—ฐ๐—ธ ๐—ง๐—ถ๐—ด๐—ฒ๐—ฟ ๐—–๐—ฎ๐—น๐—น๐˜€ pinned Deleted message

2 Jun 2026, 03:30 UTCviews โ€”

๐—•๐—น๐—ฎ๐—ฐ๐—ธ ๐—ง๐—ถ๐—ด๐—ฒ๐—ฟ ๐—–๐—ฎ๐—น๐—น๐˜€ pinned a photo

2 Jun 2026, 03:30 UTCโ‰ˆ5,610 views101 reactionsread 11 August 2026
Photo

๐Ÿ’ธ๐Ÿช™ SOLANA ๐Ÿงฌ๐Ÿ˜€ #PEPTI The newly launched $PEPTI is worth paying attention to ๐Ÿ‘€ The project aims to build the largest Peptides education and related ecosystem platform on Solana, not just a meme, but with a clear development direction. ๐Ÿš€ New coin just launched ๐Ÿš€ DeSci + Solana narrative ๐Ÿš€ Early discovery stage ๐Ÿš€ Watch for entry opportunities after pullback ๐ŸŸข/CA: 61aNNrrRp81a3ZztDL69dNyrcshBsqWZdWVSrpYpump ๐Ÿฆ…/Chaโ€ฆ

๐Ÿ‘26๐Ÿ”ฅ26โค19๐Ÿ’‹9๐Ÿ’ฏ9๐Ÿ•Š5๐Ÿ“4๐Ÿพ3

21 May 2026, 10:01 UTCviews โ€”

๐—•๐—น๐—ฎ๐—ฐ๐—ธ ๐—ง๐—ถ๐—ด๐—ฒ๐—ฟ ๐—–๐—ฎ๐—น๐—น๐˜€ pinned a photo

21 May 2026, 10:00 UTCโ‰ˆ5,820 viewsread 11 August 2026
Photo

RWA ( Real World Assets ) ๐ŸŽจ Iโ€™d like to introduce you to a new project in the RWA (Real World Assets) sector thatโ€™s definitely worth your attention. โ†—๏ธ RWA Inc. is building infrastructure to tokenize real-world assets such as real estate, equity, and other financial instruments, making them accessible on-chain. The platform combines tokenization, a launchpad, and a marketplace, allowing users to invest in traditionโ€ฆ

19 Apr 2026, 06:58 UTCviews โ€”

๐—•๐—น๐—ฎ๐—ฐ๐—ธ ๐—ง๐—ถ๐—ด๐—ฒ๐—ฟ ๐—–๐—ฎ๐—น๐—น๐˜€ pinned a photo

19 Apr 2026, 06:57 UTCโ‰ˆ7,020 views174 reactionsread 11 August 2026
Photo

โš™๏ธ๐Ÿช™INTRODUCING $AGC SOLANA๐Ÿช™โš™๏ธ ๐ŸŸข๐Ÿ“ฃThat alien little green cat that's been super popular lately-saw a $AGC pop up on Sol, the CTO team's previous project $EVAN hit a market cap close to 100m too, with a tightly controlled chart. โ˜˜๏ธ๐ŸŸขAgentFi might be one of the next big narratives, and $AGC is worth watching as an interesting experiment. โ˜˜๏ธ๐ŸŸข@likwid_fi is building AGC as the base asset for the agent economy, not for humโ€ฆ

๐Ÿ”ฅ41โค37๐Ÿ‘31๐Ÿฅฐ23โคโ€๐Ÿ”ฅ15๐Ÿ˜14๐Ÿ’ฏ13

2 Apr 2026, 08:52 UTCviews โ€”

๐—•๐—น๐—ฎ๐—ฐ๐—ธ ๐—ง๐—ถ๐—ด๐—ฒ๐—ฟ ๐—–๐—ฎ๐—น๐—น๐˜€ pinned a photo

2 Apr 2026, 08:52 UTCโ‰ˆ3,780 views193 reactionsread 11 August 2026
Photo

โš™๏ธ๐Ÿช™ $BULL ๐Ÿ†˜โ˜˜๏ธโš™๏ธ๐Ÿš€ โš™๏ธ๐Ÿ†˜Team are heavily connected and Iโ€™ve been waiting to get in when I could. โ˜˜๏ธThey have partnered with MUMU and PONKE and the devs prev did 800M โ˜˜๏ธSeeing so many big names backing this and think we can see a crazy run with how simple it is โ€˜ literally the bull runner for the bull run โ€˜ ๐Ÿ’ต BUY | CA 3TYgKwkE2Y3rxdw9osLRSpxpXmSC1C1oo19W9KHspump ๐Ÿฆ… DexScreener: https://dexscreener.com/solana/HNGjLLZkWโ€ฆ

๐Ÿ‘46โค36๐Ÿ”ฅ34๐Ÿฅฐ21๐Ÿ˜21๐Ÿ’ฏ18โคโ€๐Ÿ”ฅ17

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @BlackTigerCalls. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked โ‰ˆ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it โ€” t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so โ‰ˆ1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank โ€” 378,964 of 1,480,688entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below โ€” republished posts weigh more than named mentions โ€” and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channelโ€™s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page โ€” a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason โ€” naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides โ€” the โ€œNamed by N registered channelsโ€ figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 15 August 2026 โ€” this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

โ€œ๐—•๐—น๐—ฎ๐—ฐ๐—ธ ๐—ง๐—ถ๐—ด๐—ฒ๐—ฟ ๐—–๐—ฎ๐—น๐—น๐˜€โ€ (@BlackTigerCalls), 2,540 subscribers as measured 15 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/BlackTigerCalls.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV ยท JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.