12 measurements spanning 28 days, net +9,905. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between β snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean βno change observedβ, never βinterpolatedβ. The vertical axis spans 1,523β14,465 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log β every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
4 Sept 2026, 08:59
12,921
-51
2 Sept 2026, 23:38
12,972
+6,172
31 Aug 2026, 11:48
6,800
no change
30 Aug 2026, 23:43
6,800
+1,496
27 Aug 2026, 13:02
5,304
+448
24 Aug 2026, 15:09
4,856
+360
20 Aug 2026, 16:03
4,496
+299
17 Aug 2026, 11:23
4,197
+334
14 Aug 2026, 03:58
3,863
+546
11 Aug 2026, 00:38
3,317
+230
7 Aug 2026, 22:57
3,087
+71
7 Aug 2026, 09:32
3,016
first reading
Engagement
17 posts held, back to 2 September 2026 β the reader has not yet reached the start of this channelβs public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegramβs post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR Β· 30 days
5.60%
avg views Γ· 12,921 subscribers
Avg views / post
724
17 posts measured
Reaction rate
3.52%
reactions Γ· views Β· ER floor
Posts in window
17
of 17 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) Γ· views β note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegramβs public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days Β· latest post in window 2 September 2026
Posts held
17 (2 September 2026 β 2 September 2026)
Views total
12,311
Reactions total
433
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface β not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
2 Sept 2026, 23:42 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than βcorrectingβ the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form β 8.12K, 3.7M β so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded β read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Reaction mix
433 reactions across 17 posts, in 12 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 78.8% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities β π is thanks in one channel and mourning in another β so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one β 4.34K, 1.2M β so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 17 of the 17 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegramβs own count on each post β not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above β those same posts carry 433 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by βa reaction total printed elsewhere on the pageβ.
Measured over the 17 most recent posts we hold, published 2 September 2026 to 2 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Gold Waterfall guys from our zone
itβs hard to believe because all people said it will fly, and nahhh
120 Pips , BOOM π₯
Congratulation who followπͺ
I WANT EFFI TO BE MY SIFU
2nd round, carefull cause price fast
β Gold Sell 50 Pips
β Gold Sell 120 Pips
lets close half or all if hold set the rest layer with breakeven
@effiaizatt β
Showing the 12 most recent of 17 posts we hold for @Bizmindtraders. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked β was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it β t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so β1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Appears in Telegramβs recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly β each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone elseβs query is independent of having been queried itself.
JAWATAN KOSONG MALAYSIA @jawatankosongMY Β· 35,629 Telegram ranks this channel #17 of 59 here β alongside 58 others β read 2 September 2026
Info SPA8i @infospa Β· 38,648 Telegram ranks this channel #18 of 59 here β alongside 58 others β read 31 August 2026
ADRIELLE TRADERS CIRCLE πΆ @AdrielleTradersCircle66 Β· 70,848 Telegram ranks this channel #33 of 69 here β alongside 68 others β read 22 August 2026
This channel appears in 4 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total, of which the 3 where it ranks highest are shown above. Each is Telegramβs list for THAT channel, not this one β see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 4 September 2026 β this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
βBIZMIND TRADERS πβ (@Bizmindtraders), 12,921 subscribers as measured 4 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Bizmindtraders.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV Β· JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.