Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Crypto Bull Crypto Experts

Channel

Crypto Bull Crypto Experts

@BitmexCourses

On this record: Topic · Observations · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

49,833subscribers

+8,914 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001261305643
TypeChannel
Username@BitmexCourses
Description📈Best Signals in Crypto Space📉 Admin @Crypto_Ronny
CreatedBetween 1 March 2018 and 31 July 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live9 November 2026
Measurements held64
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 9 November 2026
On Telegramt.me/BitmexCourses

Topic

Crypto & trading — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 9 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.

Observations

These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.

Content that also appears on other registered channels

Posts published here appear in near-verbatim form on 2 other registered channels. The matching is on the text itself, not on Telegram’s forward marker, so it finds a copy whether or not it was labelled as one.

Matching posts — open both and compare (6 of the pairs behind the counts below)
Posted firstThenOverlapGap
@FedRussianInsiders/1876420 Aug 2026, 15:52 UTC@BitmexCourses/7574 · this entry20 Aug 2026, 15:52 UTC1.00under a minute
@FedRussianInsiders/1878831 Aug 2026, 13:54 UTC@BitmexCourses/7597 · this entry31 Aug 2026, 13:54 UTC1.00under a minute
@FedRussianInsiders/187263 Aug 2026, 04:19 UTC@BitmexCourses/7539 · this entry3 Aug 2026, 04:19 UTC0.93under a minute
@FedRussianInsiders/187389 Aug 2026, 12:44 UTC@BitmexCourses/7551 · this entry9 Aug 2026, 12:44 UTC0.93under a minute
@FedRussianInsiders/188461 Oct 2026, 03:45 UTC@BitmexCourses/7656 · this entry1 Oct 2026, 03:45 UTC0.91under a minute
@FedRussianInsiders/1888421 Oct 2026, 03:37 UTC@BitmexCourses/7694 · this entry21 Oct 2026, 03:37 UTC0.89under a minute
Channels this entry shares post bodies with, where at least one matching post pair has no forward credit between the two channels, or to a common source, recorded in our data
ChannelMatching postsText overlapTypical gapPublished first
@FedRussianInsiders15 (8/8 hand-verifiable sample passed)0.93under a minute@FedRussianInsiders (15–0)
@FedRussianInsidersTG11 (8/8 hand-verifiable sample passed)0.9381 minutesthis entry (11–0)

Text overlap is the Jaccard coefficient over the set of distinct three-word phrases in the two bodies: 1.00 is identical wording, and the threshold for counting a pair at all is 0.70. Candidates are generated by simhash LSH (4 x 16-bit bands, exact Hamming <= 3) verified against the bodies with Jaccard over the SET of distinct 3-word shingles. Published first counts which side of each matching pair carries the earlier timestamp — in this corpus, which is the limitation directly below.

What this cannot establish

MEASURED, DOMINANT ERROR SOURCE: a post ingested before 2026-08-06 may have carried a forward header that was not recorded. A 45-pair hand-check against live t.me pages found 14 (31%) where the live page shows a forward header naming the other channel and the database has none, plus 4 more (9%) naming a third party. The text match itself was wrong 0 times out of 45. Read attribution_capture.items_in_trusted_window before treating the unattributed count as a claim.

Telegram lets a channel forward a post with a header naming the source, and we only began reliably recording that header on 2026-08-06. 14 of the 15 matches recorded here fall after that date and carried no header when we read them. The rest predate reliable capture and are not evidence either way.

“Published first” means first in this corpus. We hold 197 comparable posts for this entry, running 28 July 2026 to 10 November 2026. A channel we have read one page deep will look younger than a neighbour we have read in full, and the order would flip with no change in the underlying facts.

The detector’s own notes on this observation, as it recorded them. Names in this_style are fields of the underlying evidence record, which the plain-English paragraphs above read out for this entry.

  • Verbatim republication has three causes and the text separates only two: a clone/mirror, unattributed copy-paste, or BOTH channels copying a common third source that neither attributes. The spread filter (content held by at most 8 channels) reduces the third and does not remove it.
  • 'Earliest' means earliest IN THIS CORPUS. A channel ingested one page deep will look younger than a neighbour ingested in full; corpus_coverage above is there to be checked before the direction is believed.
  • shared_verified_est extrapolates the sampled pass rate over the full narrow match count; sampled/passed are the numbers actually measured.
  • Absence of a forward header is not proof of intent: Telegram lets a channel disable forward attribution, and a credit written in the body is not parsed as attribution here (mention_edge_either_way above is the closest available signal).

Recorded under the keys clone_copy · clone_source, last confirmed 11 November 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.

Growth

37,04252,11044,57649,8336 August 20269 November 2026
64 measurements spanning 96 days, net +8,914. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 34,782–54,370 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 64
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
9 Nov 2026, 20:5949,833-119
8 Nov 2026, 09:1949,952-106
7 Nov 2026, 07:0150,058-54
6 Nov 2026, 06:1850,112-29
5 Nov 2026, 08:4950,141-49
4 Nov 2026, 09:5050,190-244
3 Nov 2026, 07:2150,434-408
2 Nov 2026, 09:3750,842-76
1 Nov 2026, 06:2650,918-122
31 Oct 2026, 08:4451,040-144
30 Oct 2026, 05:4051,184-542
29 Oct 2026, 06:3751,726-311
28 Oct 2026, 02:2852,037-73
27 Oct 2026, 01:4152,110+125
25 Oct 2026, 23:4951,985+404
25 Oct 2026, 02:4151,581-12
24 Oct 2026, 01:0851,593-110
22 Oct 2026, 23:0951,703-49
21 Oct 2026, 19:3151,752-35
20 Oct 2026, 13:4651,787first reading

Engagement

207 posts held, back to 28 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 180 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
26.5%
avg views ÷ 49,833 subscribers
Avg views / post
13,200
54 posts measured
Reaction rate
—
this channel exposes no reaction counts
Posts in window
54
of 207 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 10 November 2026
Posts held207 (28 July 2026 – 10 November 2026)
Views total712,500
Reactions total—
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken10 Nov 2026, 21:38 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
240
Videos
11
Links
719

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 10 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Recent posts

Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 0 of 54 posts held from the last 30 days (0%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).

10 Nov 2026, 19:26 UTC≈4,610 viewsread 10 November 2026

$ETH ANALYSIS -------------------- $ETH/USDT trades at $2,043, dumping straight into the rising trendline from the $1,515 June bottom after October CPI came in hotter than expected. Headline inflation rose 0.4% against a 0.3% forecast, core beat too, rate hike odds jumped, and leveraged longs got flushed as ETH tested $2,000. Reclaim $2,100 and price loads a bounce toward $2,180 with $2,260 above. Lose $2,000 and th…

10 Nov 2026, 03:39 UTC≈15,100 viewsread 10 November 2026

$SUI ANALYSIS -------------------- $SUI/USDT trades at $0.8411, bouncing off the rising trendline from $0.6350 after a wick near $0.8000 got bought on Monday. Sellers have printed lower highs all the way down from the $1.27 top, and the latest bounce already stalled under $0.8800. Reclaim $0.8800 and price loads a push toward $0.9200 with $0.9600 above. Lose $0.8000 and the trendline cracks, with $0.7700 and $0.7400…

9 Nov 2026, 19:24 UTC≈15,200 viewsread 10 November 2026

$JUP ANALYSIS -------------------- $JUP/USDT trades at $0.2553, ripping higher after a wick into the rising trendline from $0.1625 got bought near $0.2260. One strong green candle erased the whole weekend slide, and price is now pressing right back into the $0.2600 ceiling that capped last week’s bounce. Break $0.2600 and price loads a push toward $0.2700 with $0.2800 above. Lose $0.2400 and price drags back to the …

9 Nov 2026, 03:59 UTC≈15,200 viewsread 10 November 2026

$BTC ANALYSIS -------------------- $BTC/USDT trades at $75,101, heading into a fifth straight red weekly close as sellers dragged price all the way back from the $87,000 high. The decline has landed right on the 50 week moving average, the same line that acted as support throughout 2024 and 2025 before price lost it last December, and bulls just reclaimed it in August. Hold the 50 MA and price loads a bounce toward …

7 Nov 2026, 21:01 UTC≈15,100 viewsread 10 November 2026

$XRP ANALYSIS -------------------- $XRP/USDT trades at $1.1559, sliding straight onto the bottom of the descending channel from $1.64 after sellers rejected the push at the upper line near $1.34. Thursday’s sell off dragged price down for six days of lower candles, and buyers have defended this channel floor on every touch since early October. Reclaim $1.1850 and price loads a bounce toward $1.2100 with $1.2400 abov…

7 Nov 2026, 03:51 UTC≈10,400 viewsread 10 November 2026

$BNB ANALYSIS -------------------- $BNB/USDT trades at $693.17, holding right on the rising trendline from $535 after the Binance hack candle and Thursday’s market wide dump both wicked into it near $680. Buyers keep defending this line, but sellers have capped every bounce below $720 since the hack. Reclaim $720 and price loads a push toward $740 with $760 above. Lose $680 and the trendline cracks, with $660 and $6…

6 Nov 2026, 19:42 UTC≈14,400 viewsread 10 November 2026

$HYPE ANALYSIS -------------------- $HYPE/USDT trades at $78.26, sliding back onto the rising trendline from $51 after giving up the entire ICE news spike toward $97. Thursday’s market wide dump wicked right into this line near $76.50, and buyers stepped in once again at the same $77 floor that has held since August. Reclaim $81 and price loads a push toward $85 with $89 above. Lose $77 and the trendline cracks, wit…

6 Nov 2026, 03:50 UTC≈14,000 viewsread 10 November 2026

$ETH/BTC ANALYSIS -------------------- $ETH/BTC trades at 0.02944, pulling back after sellers rejected the push right at the top of the descending channel from 0.0334. The ratio bounced cleanly off the channel floor near 0.0284 during the hack sell off, but the upper line capped the rally again near 0.0305. Break 0.0305 and ETH escapes the channel, loading a run toward 0.0309 with 0.0313 above. Lose 0.0292 and the r…

5 Nov 2026, 21:31 UTC≈15,100 viewsread 10 November 2026

$BTC ANALYSIS -------------------- $BTC/USDT trades at $76,149, crashing straight back into the $75,000 to $76,000 demand zone as Wall Street dumped across the board. Tech led the sell off on fears that the new Congress brings tighter AI and crypto regulation, the Nasdaq sank over 4%, and crypto liquidations soared, wiping out the whole post election rally in one candle. Hold the zone and reclaim $78,000 and price l…

5 Nov 2026, 14:07 UTC≈14,300 viewsread 10 November 2026

📍SIGNAL ID: #G183📍 ➖➖ [VIP ONLY] ➖➖ 👉Join our VIP → @Crypto_Ronny -------------------- Yours truly, Crypto_Bull_Crypto_Experts

5 Nov 2026, 03:27 UTC≈13,600 viewsread 10 November 2026

$LTC ANALYSIS -------------------- $LTC/USDT trades at $56.39, bouncing hard after election night’s wick to $52 got bought and price ripped back above $55. The descending support line from early October keeps catching every flush, while sellers cap each rally with lower highs since the $72 top. Break $58 and price loads a push toward $60 with $62 above. Lose $55 and price drags back toward $53.50 with $52 waiting be…

4 Nov 2026, 19:27 UTC≈14,600 viewsread 10 November 2026

$BTC ANALYSIS -------------------- $BTC/USDT trades at $80,224, ripping higher after Democrats won control of both the House and Senate in the midterms and election uncertainty cleared out of the market. Election night’s wick into the $74,800 to $76,000 demand zone got bought instantly, and two strong green candles have pushed price straight back above $80,000. Break $81,000 and price loads a push toward $82,000 wit…

Showing the 12 most recent of 207 posts we hold for @BitmexCourses. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 9 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Crypto Bull Crypto Experts” (@BitmexCourses), 49,833 subscribers as measured 9 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/BitmexCourses.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.