Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

Ton Price 💎 سعر التون

@Bitcoindirection

On this record: Topic · Observations · Also posting the same content · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

28,600subscribers

-167 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1003313748060
TypeChannel
Username@Bitcoindirection
DescriptionTON Price 💸 minute by minute سعر التون دقيقه ب دقيقه
CreatedBetween 1 November 2025 and 31 March 2026— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live12 August 2026
Measurements held7
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 12 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/Bitcoindirection

Topic

Giveaways & airdrops — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 49% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Observations

These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.

Content that also appears on other registered channels

Posts published here appear word for word on 1 other registered channel. The matching is on the text itself, not on Telegram’s forward marker, so it finds a copy whether or not it was labelled as one.

Matching posts — open both and compare (6 of the pairs behind the counts below)
Posted firstThenOverlapGap
@OffiCiaL_BloodLine/106013 Jul 2026, 05:05 UTC@Bitcoindirection/232239 · this entry13 Jul 2026, 05:05 UTC1.00under a minute
@OffiCiaL_BloodLine/106126 Jul 2026, 09:26 UTC@Bitcoindirection/232240 · this entry26 Jul 2026, 09:26 UTC1.00under a minute
@OffiCiaL_BloodLine/106226 Jul 2026, 15:08 UTC@Bitcoindirection/232241 · this entry26 Jul 2026, 15:08 UTC1.00under a minute
@OffiCiaL_BloodLine/106427 Jul 2026, 12:56 UTC@Bitcoindirection/232243 · this entry27 Jul 2026, 12:56 UTC1.00under a minute
@OffiCiaL_BloodLine/106629 Jul 2026, 16:28 UTC@Bitcoindirection/232245 · this entry29 Jul 2026, 16:28 UTC1.00under a minute
@OffiCiaL_BloodLine/10683 Aug 2026, 14:27 UTC@Bitcoindirection/232247 · this entry3 Aug 2026, 14:27 UTC1.00under a minute
Every channel this entry shares post bodies with
ChannelMatching postsText overlapTypical gapPublished first
@OffiCiaL_BloodLine6 (6/6 hand-verifiable sample passed)1.00under a minute@OffiCiaL_BloodLine (42)

Text overlap is the Jaccard coefficient over the set of distinct three-word phrases in the two bodies: 1.00 is identical wording, and the threshold for counting a pair at all is 0.70. Candidates are generated by simhash LSH (4 x 16-bit bands, exact Hamming <= 3) verified against the bodies with Jaccard over the SET of distinct 3-word shingles. Published first counts which side of each matching pair carries the earlier timestamp — in this corpus, which is the limitation directly below.

What this cannot establish

MEASURED, DOMINANT ERROR SOURCE: a post ingested before 2026-08-06 may have carried a forward header that was not recorded. A 45-pair hand-check against live t.me pages found 14 (31%) where the live page shows a forward header naming the other channel and the database has none, plus 4 more (9%) naming a third party. The text match itself was wrong 0 times out of 45. Read attribution_capture.items_in_trusted_window before treating the unattributed count as a claim.

Telegram lets a channel forward a post with a header naming the source, and we only began reliably recording that header on 2026-08-06. None of the 4 matches recorded here fall after that date, so for this entry we cannot say whether any of them carried a credit. The duplication is measured; the absence of attribution is not.

“Published first” means first in this corpus. We hold 8 comparable posts for this entry, running 13 July 2026 to 3 August 2026. A channel we have read one page deep will look younger than a neighbour we have read in full, and the order would flip with no change in the underlying facts.

The detector’s own notes on this observation, as it recorded them. Names in this_style are fields of the underlying evidence record, which the plain-English paragraphs above read out for this entry.

  • Verbatim republication has three causes and the text separates only two: a clone/mirror, unattributed copy-paste, or BOTH channels copying a common third source that neither attributes. The spread filter (content held by at most 8 channels) reduces the third and does not remove it.
  • 'Earliest' means earliest IN THIS CORPUS. A channel ingested one page deep will look younger than a neighbour ingested in full; corpus_coverage above is there to be checked before the direction is believed.
  • shared_verified_est extrapolates the sampled pass rate over the full narrow match count; sampled/passed are the numbers actually measured.
  • Absence of a forward header is not proof of intent: Telegram lets a channel disable forward attribution, and a credit written in the body is not parsed as attribution here (mention_edge_either_way above is the closest available signal).

Across the whole group of 2, the earliest publisher we hold is @OffiCiaL_BloodLine. That is a statement about our reading window, not a claim of authorship.

Views per post sit far below this size band

30.1 average views per post against 28,600 subscribers — an engagement rate of 0.105%. Across the 4,324 registered channels in the same cohort — 10,000–31,619 subscribers, posting mainly in Arabic — the middle half sit between 2.98% and 14.5%, with a median of 7.20%.

What this was computed from
Window30 days (13 July 2026 12 August 2026)
Posts measured11 of 11 published in the window (11 exact, 0 rounded by Telegram)
Views totalled331
Mature posts only0.105% over 11 posts read at least 24h after publication
Subscribers28,600 measured 12 August 2026
Cohortb10000:ara · 4,324 channels · p10 1.01% · p25 2.98% · p50 7.20% · p75 14.5% · p90 25.3%
Position in cohort0.416th percentile · 1/67 the cohort median
Uncertainty±0% of the figure, from Telegram’s rounding
Post languageArabic · 100.0%of the window’s posts

When this is recorded. A channel is listed here only when its engagement rate sits at or below the 1st percentile of its cohort and is at least 3× away from that cohort’s median — below it — on both the all-readings figure and the mature-only figure. The percentile alone would be circular: a percentile cut puts the same share of every cohort in the tail whatever the data looks like. The distance from the median is what makes it a statement about this channel.

This is not a verdict, and the direction is not a quality signal.A low rate has many innocent causes — audiences that read in the Telegram app without opening the channel, a subscriber base built long before the current output, an audience in a different timezone from our reading. A high rate has innocent causes too: a post that travelled far beyond the channel’s own subscribers will do it. We publish the measurement and the distribution it sits in. The full cohort baselines are downloadable, so this comparison can be reproduced rather than trusted.

Recorded under the keys clone_copy · err_low, last confirmed 12 August 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.

Also posting the same content

This channel’s posts match, word for word or near enough, posts on 1 other registered channel, found by comparing text fingerprints across every channel on the register. That matching has been checked by hand against the live Telegram pages and found reliable — 0 wrong of 45 pairs re-read.

Which channel, if either, published first is deliberately not shown. The same hand-check found that reading wrong 18 of 45 times — 60%, no better than a coin flip — because it depends on how deep our own crawl happened to reach into each channel’s history, not on when the content was actually first posted. This list is ordered by subscriber count, the same as every other listing on this site, never by which channel we think came first. Word-for-word matching has several ordinary explanations besides copying — a channel mirroring itself, an unattributed repost, or two channels independently repeating the same wire story — and this measurement cannot tell those apart. How this is measured.

Growth

28,60028,76728,683.57 August 2026 — 28,767 subscribers7 August 2026 — 28,767 subscribers8 August 2026 — 28,751 subscribers9 August 2026 — 28,714 subscribers10 August 2026 — 28,670 subscribers11 August 2026 — 28,625 subscribers12 August 2026 — 28,600 subscribers7 August 202612 August 2026
7 measurements spanning 5 days, net -167. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 28,575–28,792 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
12 Aug 2026, 11:0728,600-25
11 Aug 2026, 10:4328,625-45
10 Aug 2026, 09:4628,670-44
9 Aug 2026, 07:5328,714-37
8 Aug 2026, 07:3628,751-16
7 Aug 2026, 18:0028,767no change
7 Aug 2026, 17:5428,767first reading

Engagement

22 posts held, back to 8 June 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 15 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
0.105%
avg views ÷ 28,600 subscribers
Avg views / post
30.1
11 posts measured
Reaction rate
this channel exposes no reaction counts
Posts in window
11
of 22 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 10 August 2026
Posts held22 (8 June 202610 August 2026)
Views total331
Reactions total
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken12 Aug 2026, 21:51 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
7
Links
39

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 12 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Recent posts

10 Aug 2026, 12:50 UTC12 viewsread 12 August 2026

🔥🚀 عايز تكسب من بوتك ؟! 🚀🔥 ✨ كل صنع بوت «بربح لك» = $$ 💰 1,000مشترك ببوتك= 10$! 😱💸 🎁 والمهم: لا يوجد اذاعات ف بوتك ! 🔥🌟 💰والاهم: تسليم ف نفس يوم مو مثل باقين 🔗 انضم الان [ https://t.me/Esna3Bot ] ⚡ متفكرش كتير! كل ما تصنع أكتر → ارباح تزيد أسرع → وانت الكسبان الأول! 🚀🔥 👑 ابدأ دلوقتي وسيب الباقي علينا! اثبات الثقه https://t.me/nuuu55 2

9 Aug 2026, 19:16 UTC15 viewsread 12 August 2026

تريد تربح نجوم ادخل علي راب هذا https://telegram.me/linknibot/app?startapp=x_25059 ثم اختار ذكر وسن 18الي 23 واختار اي دول امريكا مثلا كدا ربحت 5نجوم https://telegram.me/linknibot/app?startapp=x_25059 وثم ارجع اضغط علي رابط يتغير دخول بعطيك 5نجوم جديد https://telegram.me/linknibot/app?startapp=x_25059 ثم ارجع وضغط ثاني عيدها 5مرات https://telegram.me/linknibot/app?startapp=x_25059 وكدا ربح 25نجوم

3 Aug 2026, 14:27 UTC33 viewsread 12 August 2026

• تم صنع رابط هدية بقيمة 200.0 نقطة • الرابط : https://t.me/botx7bot?start=toc037884b332ba58fcd5f944c2878ea88891973 • الرابط صالح لمده 30 ساعة • يمكن ل 250 عضو الدخول الى الرابط #اكثر_من_200خدمة_رشق_مجاني

29 Jul 2026, 23:13 UTC41 viewsread 12 August 2026

⚠️#_عرض_لفتره_محدوده(X) 🎁🔥" ~ رابط الدعوة ( 400 ) نقطه 😱 ~ لكل مشاركة رابط الدعوة 400 نقطه 💎 ~ لكل 100صديق مدعو = 5$ 💰💰 🌟معرف البوت⏎ @botx7bot ➥🌟 #فرصتكم_لتجميع_ملاين_النقاط😍

29 Jul 2026, 16:28 UTC32 viewsread 12 August 2026

تم صنع رابط هدية بقيمة 199.999 نقطة • الرابط : https://t.me/botx7bot?start=to2d73fdb3914bf4ebccf9460ce004e3e6840680 • الرابط صالح لمده 30 ساعة • يمكن ل 299 عضو الدخول الى الرابط #اكثر_من_200خدمة_رشق_مجاني

28 Jul 2026, 15:51 UTC25 viewsread 12 August 2026

⚠️#_عرض_لفتره_محدوده(X) 🎁🔥" ~ رابط الدعوة ( 400 ) نقطه 😱 ~ لكل مشاركة رابط الدعوة 400 نقطه 💎 ~ لكل 100صديق مدعو = 5$ 💰💰 🌟معرف البوت⏎ @botx7bot ➥🌟 #فرصتكم_لتجميع_ملاين_النقاط😍

27 Jul 2026, 12:56 UTC26 viewsread 12 August 2026

• تم صنع رابط هدية بقيمة 250.00 نقطة • الرابط : https://t.me/botx7bot?start=todbae7b33b1a2c0c458d472cf119bf8e9197176 • الرابط يعطيك خدمات رشق لكل مواقع استمتع الان بالمجان • يمكن ل 250 عضو الدخول الى الرابط

26 Jul 2026, 15:08 UTC38 viewsread 12 August 2026

• تم صنع رابط هدية بقيمة 111.1 نقطة • الرابط : https://t.me/botx7bot?start=to4cc5f044c8fa60ba60c1918fb320d5a972729 • الرابط صالح لمده 30 ساعة • يمكن ل 333 عضو الدخول الى الرابط

26 Jul 2026, 09:26 UTC43 viewsread 12 August 2026

⚠️#_عرض_لفتره_محدوده(X) 🎁🔥" ~ رابط الدعوة ( 400 ) نقطه 😱 ~ لكل مشاركة رابط الدعوة 400 نقطه 💎 ~ لكل 100صديق مدعو = 5$ 💰💰 🌟معرف البوت⏎ @botx7bot ➥🌟 #فرصتكم_لتجميع_ملاين_النقاط😍

13 Jul 2026, 05:05 UTC58 viewsread 12 August 2026

*🔥🚀 عايز تكسب من بوتك ؟! 🚀🔥 ✨ كل صنع بوت «بربح لك» = $$ 💰 1,000مشترك ببوتك= 10$! 😱💸 🎁 والمهم: لا يوجد اذاعات ف بوتك ! 🔥🌟 💰والاهم: تسليم ف نفس يوم مو مثل باقين 🔗 انضم الان [ https://t.me/Esna3Bot ] ⚡ متفكرش كتير! كل ما تصنع أكتر → ارباح تزيد أسرع → وانت الكسبان الأول! 🚀🔥 👑 ابدأ دلوقتي وسيب الباقي علينا!*

Showing the 12 most recent of 22 posts we hold for @Bitcoindirection. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Mentions

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Ton Price 💎 سعر التون” (@Bitcoindirection), 28,600 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Bitcoindirection.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.