Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

Bitcoin | Крипто Новости

@Bitcoin_crypto

On this record: Topic · Observations · Growth · Engagement · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

2,632subscribers

-1 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001225928055
TypeChannel
Username@Bitcoin_crypto
CreatedBetween 1 April 2018 and 30 June 2021— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live12 August 2026
Measurements held4
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 12 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/Bitcoin_crypto

Topic

Crypto & trading — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 99% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Observations

These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.

Views per post sit far above this size band

4,490 average views per post against 2,632 subscribers — an engagement rate of 170.6%. Across the 54,164 registered channels in the same cohort — 1,000–3,162 subscribers, posting mainly in Russian — the middle half sit between 10.5% and 35.6%, with a median of 20.1%.

What this was computed from
Window30 days (13 July 2026 12 August 2026)
Posts measured24 of 24 published in the window (1 exact, 23 rounded by Telegram)
Views totalled107,755
Mature posts only182.0% over 22 posts read at least 24h after publication
Subscribers2,632 measured 12 August 2026
Cohortb1000:rus · 54,164 channels · p10 5.33% · p25 10.5% · p50 20.1% · p75 35.6% · p90 57.1%
Position in cohort99.352th percentile · 8.5× the cohort median
Uncertainty±0.11% of the figure, from Telegram’s rounding
Post languageRussian · 100.0%of the window’s posts

When this is recorded. A channel is listed here only when its engagement rate sits at or above the 99th percentile of its cohort and is at least 3× away from that cohort’s median — above it — on both the all-readings figure and the mature-only figure. The percentile alone would be circular: a percentile cut puts the same share of every cohort in the tail whatever the data looks like. The distance from the median is what makes it a statement about this channel.

This is not a verdict, and the direction is not a quality signal.A low rate has many innocent causes — audiences that read in the Telegram app without opening the channel, a subscriber base built long before the current output, an audience in a different timezone from our reading. A high rate has innocent causes too: a post that travelled far beyond the channel’s own subscribers will do it. We publish the measurement and the distribution it sits in. The full cohort baselines are downloadable, so this comparison can be reproduced rather than trusted.

Recorded under the key err_high, last confirmed 12 August 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.

Growth

2,6312,6332,6326 August 2026 — 2,633 subscribers6 August 2026 — 2,633 subscribers9 August 2026 — 2,631 subscribers12 August 2026 — 2,632 subscribers6 August 202612 August 2026
4 measurements spanning 6 days, net -1. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 2,631–2,633 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
12 Aug 2026, 16:042,632+1
9 Aug 2026, 07:132,631-2
6 Aug 2026, 10:502,633no change
6 Aug 2026, 06:062,633first reading

Engagement

24 posts held, back to 26 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 2 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
170.6%
avg views ÷ 2,632 subscribers
Avg views / post
4,490
24 posts measured
Reaction rate
this channel exposes no reaction counts
Posts in window
24
of 24 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 7 August 2026
Posts held24 (26 July 20267 August 2026)
Views total107,755
Reactions total
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken7 Aug 2026, 16:19 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Recent posts

7 Aug 2026, 10:35 UTC935 viewsread 7 August 2026
Photo

📊 Киты биткоина скупают, в то время как розничные инвесторы продают, и Santiment заявляет, что тренд благоприятствует движению выше $70,000.

7 Aug 2026, 06:30 UTC≈1,450 viewsread 7 August 2026
Photo

💰Институциональные фонды, инвестирующие в BTC, с мая этого года сократили свои запасы на 10%

6 Aug 2026, 09:33 UTC≈4,650 viewsread 7 August 2026
Photo

📊 По данным CryptoQuant, крупные держатели криптовалюты накапливают биткоин, Ethereum и XRP, поскольку цены остаются под давлением. Это говорит о том, что медвежий рынок, вероятно, находится на заключительной стадии, но цены могут упасть еще ниже, прежде чем будет подтверждено четкое дно. Согласно аналитикам, балансы крупных держателей биткоинов (за исключением бирж и майнинговых пулов) выросли примерно до 3,06 млн

6 Aug 2026, 06:13 UTC≈4,540 viewsread 7 August 2026
Photo

📊💰 Топ-100 публичных компаний контролируют 1,257,849 BTC.

5 Aug 2026, 10:07 UTC≈4,390 viewsread 7 August 2026
Photo

🪙 Через блокчейн Tron с начала 2026 года проведено $4,76 трлн в стейблкоинах. Среднемесячный объем составляет $680 млрд.

5 Aug 2026, 06:08 UTC≈4,630 viewsread 7 August 2026
Photo

📊 10X Research обращают внимание на месячный RSI в BTC и не исключают, что циклическое дно на рынке может быть сформировано уже в этом месяце.

4 Aug 2026, 09:32 UTC≈5,040 viewsread 7 August 2026
Photo

☘️ Очередной майнер-одиночка добыл блок Биткоина и заработал 3.15 BTC ($200 000). Мощность оборудования майнера — около 2.4 PH/s.

4 Aug 2026, 06:34 UTC≈4,700 viewsread 7 August 2026
Photo

💰За последнюю неделю биткоин-майнеры продали примерно 1 774 BTC на сумму около $112 млн, что сигнализирует о новой волне фиксации прибыли.

3 Aug 2026, 09:37 UTC≈5,320 viewsread 7 August 2026
Photo

🪙 Solana по итогам июля обновила исторический максимум по количеству проведенных транзакций, достигнутый месяцем ранее: 4,244 млрд.

3 Aug 2026, 06:01 UTC≈4,730 viewsread 7 August 2026
Photo

🗣 Trump Media перевела 2 628 BTC на бирж Компания перевела 2 628 BTC (~$165 млн) на Crypto․com. Совокупные убытки достигли $555 млн Ранее было накоплено 11 542 BTC по средней цене $118 529 за монету - на $1,368 млрд, привлечённых через продажу акций и конвертируемых облигаций летом прошлого года. С начала года компания распродала 7 281 BTC по средней цене ~$74 860, зафиксировав убыток $318 млн. Оставшиеся 4 261 BT

2 Aug 2026, 06:48 UTC≈4,870 viewsread 7 August 2026
Photo

📊 Спотовые ETF на Dogecoin зафиксировали чистый отток в размере 526 тыс. долларов в июле, что стало их худшим месяцем с момента запуска в ноябре 2025 года.

1 Aug 2026, 14:28 UTC≈5,470 viewsread 7 August 2026
Photo

🔼Биткоин и Ethereum закрыли июль в плюсе после худшего месяца года После июньского падения более чем на 20% крипторынок частично восстановился. По итогам июля биткоин вырос на 7,36%, а Ethereum — на 18,5%, свидетельствуют данные CoinGlass. Несмотря на рост котировок, настроения инвесторов остаются осторожными — индекс страха и жадности находится на уровне 33 пунктов, что соответствует зоне страха.

Showing the 12 most recent of 24 posts we hold for @Bitcoin_crypto. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 1,082,462 of 1,151,006entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Bitcoin | Крипто Новости” (@Bitcoin_crypto), 2,632 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Bitcoin_crypto.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.