Channel
@Bitcoin_Vault
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
5,351subscribers
-64 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001193584660 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @Bitcoin_Vault |
| Created | Between 1 March 2018 and 31 July 2021— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 29 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 9 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 29 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/Bitcoin_Vault |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 29 Aug 2026, 11:08 | 5,351 | -7 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 12:38 | 5,358 | -8 |
| 23 Aug 2026, 11:14 | 5,366 | -14 |
| 19 Aug 2026, 19:45 | 5,380 | -9 |
| 16 Aug 2026, 17:17 | 5,389 | -7 |
| 13 Aug 2026, 05:56 | 5,396 | -5 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 12:03 | 5,401 | -13 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 02:24 | 5,414 | -1 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 17:45 | 5,415 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 13 December 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 8 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 30 July 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
524 reactions across 20 posts, in 15 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 51.1% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 268 | 51.1% | |
| 👍 | 115 | 21.9% | |
| 🔥 | 74 | 14.1% | |
| 👏 | 20 | 3.82% | |
| 🌚 | 8 | 1.53% | |
| 🌭 | 7 | 1.34% | |
| 💯 | 6 | 1.15% | |
| 🙏 | 5 | 0.954% | |
| 🤔 | 5 | 0.954% | |
| 🤩 | 5 | 0.954% | |
| 🕊 | 4 | 0.763% | |
| 😁 | 2 | 0.382% | |
| 🤯 | 2 | 0.382% | |
| 🥰 | 2 | 0.382% | |
| 👌 | 1 | 0.191% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 524reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 13 December 2025 to 30 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
⚠️ URGENT NOTICE FOR ALL BITMART USERS ⚠️ BitMart has officially announced the orderly shutdown of its trading platform. If you still hold any assets on BitMart, do not wait until the last minute. 🔴 Take action NOW: ✅ Check your account balances ✅ Cancel any open orders ✅ Close all trading positions ✅ Redeem staking, Earn, or other investment products ✅ Complete or update your KYC verification ✅ Withdraw your funds…
❤6👍3🤔1
🔐 BTCV is redefining crypto payments with security at its core. For users, BTCV offers reversible transactions, enhanced protection, and greater peace of mind when sending funds. For merchants, it means reduced fraud risks, stronger customer trust, and seamless integration into existing payment systems. But this is only the beginning. 🚀 As BTCV continues to evolve, new features and innovations are on the way, furt…
❤20🔥8🕊3
BTCV dev plan: ⚙️ Phase 1 — Foundation Cleanup & Modernization 📅 Expected completion: July 2026 Work begins to improve maintainability, compatibility, and upgrade readiness. 📱 Phase 2 — Wallet Modernization & Compatibility 📅 Expected completion: August 2026 Progressive BTCV wallet improvements focused on stability, UX, and compatibility across the ecosystem. Adding BTC to the list of blockchains available! 🔐 Phase…
👍25❤11👏3💯2🤔1😁1
🚀 Explore the potential of Bitcoin Vault (BTCV) and discover how its security-focused blockchain can support safer digital asset management. 🔐 Protect long-term holdings with BTCV's multi-key security approach designed to reduce risks from mistakes or unauthorized access. 🏛 Empower businesses and communities to secure high-value transfers with added transaction control and treasury protection. 🌐 Unlock new opportuni…
❤14🔥5👍1
🚀 Bitcoin Vault (BTCV) – Next-Level Security & Value 🔐 Discover a smarter way to hold and grow your crypto! ✅ Secure your Bitcoin Vault with multi-key protection 🔑 Unlock added value 💱 Seamlessly transact using BTCV coin Built for security. Designed for growth. 📈 Step into the future of digital assets with BTCV! 💡
❤13👍5🌚2
BTCV vs Traditional Cryptocurrencies (Security Focus) 🔐 BTCV builds on the foundation of Bitcoin by introducing added layers of protection designed for real-world use. 🚀 While most cryptocurrencies rely entirely on private key security, BTCV goes further with a 3-Key system and the ability to reverse transactions. This added flexibility gives users more control 🛡 and helps reduce risks tied to irreversible transfer…
❤17👍5🌚1👌1👏1🥰1
Happy Easter, BTCV fam! 🐣🌷 Wishing you all a day full of peace, good vibes, and fresh beginnings. May this season bring growth, success, and lots of positive energy your way 🚀 Grateful to have such an amazing community—let’s keep building together 💛
❤18👏1
🛡 Tired of "One Mistake & It’s Gone"? 🛡 Bitcoin started the revolution, but BTCV is evolving it. 🚀 Standard cryptos rely entirely on your private key. One hack or one wrong address, and your funds are history. Bitcoin Vault (BTCV) changes the game by solving crypto’s biggest headache: irreversibility. Why BTCV is the Ultimate Upgrade: BTC: Standard Security + Permanent Transactions ❌ BTCV: Triple Security + Revers…
🔥11👏5❤4👍1
⛏️ Mine Bitcoin. Earn BTCV. Same hardware. Zero extra cost. Bitcoin Vault ($BTCV) supports merge mining with Bitcoin — using Auxiliary Proof-of-Work (AuxPoW), your existing rig mines both chains simultaneously. Why miners should care: 🔋 No extra energy or hardware — your Bitcoin setup already qualifies 💰 Double block rewards — earn BTC + BTCV from every block found 🔒 Stronger network — more miners = more decentra…
❤18🔥6👏4🤯2
⚡️ Why BTCV on LBank is worth your attention! ⚡️ 🔐 Bitcoin Vault (BTCV) isn't just another crypto — it's a security upgrade, making it one of the most theft-resistant assets in the market. 📊 With a capped supply of 21 million coins and active trading across 16 markets, BTCV combines Bitcoin's scarcity model with next-gen protection. 🚀 Technical indicators currently show a MACD buy signal, pointing to a potential u…
👍12❤7🤔2
🚀 Why BTCV is the New Standard in Crypto Security! 🚀 In the wild world of cryptocurrencies, security is everything. Enter Bitcoin Vault (BTCV) – a game-changer built on Bitcoin's foundation but with next-level protection. What sets it apart? Its revolutionary three-private-key system: Standard Key: For everyday transactions, just like Bitcoin. Cancel Key: Reverse unauthorized transfers within 24 hours (about 144 b…
🔥18❤9🌭6🌚2🤩2
Dear Community, Coinstore has just opened deposit function for BTCV: https://support.coinstore.vip/hc/en-us/articles/55083165367577-Announcement-on-Opening-Deposit-Function-of-BTCV Trade wisely!
❤20
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @Bitcoin_Vault. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Where would you like to see the BTCV going? Would you rather want BTCV to go for new securoty features or research quantum computing in the long term?
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 13 December 2025 to 30 July 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Citation-graph rank — 158,868 of 1,626,711entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Named by 3 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 29 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Bitcoin Vault News” (@Bitcoin_Vault), 5,351 subscribers as measured 29 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Bitcoin_Vault.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.