8 Mar 2023, 08:24 UTC67 viewsread 13 August 2026
Photo
A deeper look at what we are looking for over the next couple of days
Channel
Bitcoin Guru
@BitcoinGuru
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
4subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 11 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001811701452 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @BitcoinGuru |
| Description | Daily Crypto Alpha, calls, education and much more |
| Created | Between 1 October 2022 and 24 February 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 13 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 13 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/BitcoinGuru |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 13 Aug 2026, 10:02 | 4 | no change |
| 11 Aug 2026, 10:19 | 4 | first reading |
Engagement
20 posts held, back to 24 February 2023 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 8 March 2023. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
What this channel posts
- Photos
- 20
- Links
- 3
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 13 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Reaction mix
2 reactions across 1 post, in 2 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 50.0% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👏 | 1 | 50.0% | |
| 🔥 | 1 | 50.0% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 1 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 2reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 24 February 2023 to 8 March 2023, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
8 Mar 2023, 08:11 UTC67 viewsread 13 August 2026
BTC update: took longer than expected (didn't take into account the slow weekend) but we got our move down into the green consolidation zone as plotted in our chart above, really pleased how that played out, looking for the next phase now with a bounce back up to $22,300/400, early signs of this volume profiling are really impressive 👊🏻
4 Mar 2023, 14:46 UTC68 viewsread 13 August 2026
We got our limit filled at $22,390 👌game on
4 Mar 2023, 11:58 UTC67 viewsread 13 August 2026
taking a short here, RR is pretty good as price isn't looking too healthy, odds are on further downside before a reversal
4 Mar 2023, 11:49 UTC53 viewsread 13 August 2026
High Risk Margin BTC/USDT Entry Zone: DCA in this zone: $22,390 -$22,450 Take profit: Low Risk: $22,100 Medium Risk: $21,850 High Risk: $21,270 Stop Loss: $22,650 3% risk Manage leverage and risk, personally I never use anything more than 3x leverage
3 Mar 2023, 14:30 UTC37 viewsread 13 August 2026
Photo
Ok here we go, red line is our proposed movement over the next few days/week. Reasoning displayed too. Will see how this plays out, like i say im not trading this, for research purposes only
3 Mar 2023, 13:10 UTC34 viewsread 13 August 2026
Nailed 80% of price movement with that Technical analysis, pretty impressed to be honest, we had a huge dump which ruined the remainder of the move (would class that as an anomaly), putting together my next predictions today and will share later to follow, probably wont actually trade this until confident in the system
2 Mar 2023, 19:28 UTC32 viewsread 13 August 2026
Photo
look how close we were to being absolutely perfect
2 Mar 2023, 19:24 UTC32 viewsread 13 August 2026
Photo
followed our projection pretty well so far, price hasn't dipped as low as we wanted yet, still hoping for an opportunity to get into a trade at the red line. But pretty impressed with how well this has mapped out so far
2 Mar 2023, 08:55 UTC30 viewsread 13 August 2026
Photo
we got the initial pull back we wanted, and price currently consolidating in the area we expected, playing out nicely so far. Will be setting some buy orders in the "buy area" if price starts to look weak 👊🏻👊🏻
1 Mar 2023, 16:22 UTC27 viewsread 13 August 2026
Photo
Have been experimenting with some different methods today to predict potential future price movements, will leave this here, come back to it end of the week and see how accurate/inaccurate it is
28 Feb 2023, 13:35 UTC28 viewsread 13 August 2026
Stopped out at break even, we got close to TP1 but just missed out
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @BitcoinGuru. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 1,320,679 of 1,550,164entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Mentions
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Bitcoin Guru” (@BitcoinGuru), 4 subscribers as measured 13 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/BitcoinGuru.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.