Channel
@BitcoinConner
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
1subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 6 October 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1003265978171 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @BitcoinConner |
| Description | Head of Strategy at Bitcoin Policy Institute | #Stanford | Working towards an abundant American future. |
| Created | Between 1 October 2025 and 11 November 2025 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 October 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 6 October 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/BitcoinConner |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 6 Oct 2026, 13:22 | 1 | no change |
| 6 Oct 2026, 12:48 | 1 | first reading |
19 posts held, back to 11 November 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 19 posts for this entry, the most recent from 14 November 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 6 October 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
A true Zero-to-One moment for central banking. The Czech National Bank ($100B+ balance sheet) just bought bitcoin “to prepare for the future.” Congrats to Aleš — and we’re working every day in the U.S. to make sure America isn’t last to understand this.
It does not form part of the international reserves, and the purchases certainly do not represent any sort of investment advice on our part. Why create the portfolio? We want to be prepared for the future. The test portfolio will allow us to gain knowledge and practical experience that will prepare us for tokenisation- and digitalisation-related changes in the financial system. This will ensure we remain able to fulf…
The @CNB_cz launched a historic project from the central banking perspective: a test portfolio of digital assets. The portfolio includes bitcoin, US dollar-pegged stablecoins and a tokenised dollar deposit. The total purchase price of the portfolio is USD 1 million, or around 0.0006% of the CNB’s assets. The portfolio was created in the CNB Lab innovation hub.
Photo, posted without a caption
What do you consider to be the single best visual explainer of how the Bitcoin network operates? I’m looking for something that can be digested in less than an hour and explains all parts: - mining - nodes - wallets - blocks - Etc.
Bitcoin is savings technology for individuals, companies, endowments, and nation states. The only question is: Who will recognize this first?
Bitcoin is hope. https://x.com/BitcoinConner/status/1986427899193299087?t=r41_2xht1BJvZzZjLONOjA&s=19
was an honor to sit down with Marty for my first podcast in a very long time. It’s good to be back.
The 2023 USDC de-peg? It proved the opposite of what BPI claims: stablecoin issuer banking risk was backstopped when FDIC/Treasury/Fed protectedall SVB depositors, and USDC rapidly re-pegged. This was the reason why we wrote the GENIUS act! Stablecoin issuers needed integration with U.S. safeguards, instead of creating new systemic hole. The policy environment has changed: the GENIUS Act now sets a federal framewor…
The Bank Policy Institute’s “Stablecoin Risks” reads like it’s 2018, not 2025. It mixes up payment stablecoins with algorithmic experiments and then waves at old headlines to argue “risk.” Let’s fact-check the piece point by point. First tell: they lean on USDT’s October 2018 blip and USDC’s March 2023 SVB episode to imply ongoing peg fragility. That’s pre-GENIUS Act, pre-current reserve standards, and—re: USDC—was …
What if the U.S. did the same with tax payments in Bitcoin? 🤔
https://x.com/BitcoinConner/status/1984287081187959070?t=ena61INVD50aoc36jKQUkQ&s=35
Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @BitcoinConner. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 6 October 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Conner Brown” (@BitcoinConner), 1 subscribers as measured 6 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/BitcoinConner.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.