Education — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 13 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
21 measurements spanning 49 days, net -348. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 19,278–19,735 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 21
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
17 Oct 2026, 09:58
19,334
+3
16 Oct 2026, 12:26
19,331
-9
15 Oct 2026, 09:15
19,340
-7
14 Oct 2026, 09:56
19,347
-12
12 Oct 2026, 20:48
19,359
-39
8 Oct 2026, 09:37
19,398
-28
3 Oct 2026, 21:16
19,426
-48
25 Sept 2026, 00:19
19,474
-64
18 Sept 2026, 19:36
19,538
-9
16 Sept 2026, 10:20
19,547
-1
14 Sept 2026, 17:19
19,548
+4
13 Sept 2026, 02:58
19,544
+5
11 Sept 2026, 06:17
19,539
-8
8 Sept 2026, 12:01
19,547
-39
5 Sept 2026, 03:17
19,586
-18
3 Sept 2026, 10:18
19,604
-12
2 Sept 2026, 08:03
19,616
-11
1 Sept 2026, 07:04
19,627
-24
31 Aug 2026, 03:53
19,651
-15
30 Aug 2026, 03:13
19,666
first reading
Engagement
28 posts held, back to 29 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 9 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 28 posts for this entry, the most recent from 2 September 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Reaction mix
257 reactions across 24 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 79.8% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
205
79.8%
🔥
42
16.3%
❤🔥
6
2.33%
😱
2
0.778%
😢
1
0.389%
🫡
1
0.389%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 26 of the 28 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 257 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 28 most recent posts we hold, published 29 July 2026 to 2 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
🎉 মেডি জুলোজি by SABAS (পর্ব-০১)
📌 সামাজিক আচরণ, মৌমাছি-
☞ নিজের জীবন বিপন্ন করে হলেও দলের অন্য সদস্যদেরকে সহায়তা করা হলো Altruism
☞ মৌচাকে মৌমাছি সামাজিক আচরণ প্রদর্শন করে
☞ রাণী মৌমাছির দেহ থেকে নিঃসৃত হরমোন হলো ফেরোমন
☞ মৌচাকে সদস্যদের সংঘবদ্ধ রাখতে সাহায্য করে ফেরোমন
☞ লার্ভা থেকে রাণী মৌমাছিতে রূপান্তরকে সুপার সিডিওর বলে
☞ Apis indica এর আকৃতি প্রায় ১৫ মি.মি.
☞ শ্রমবিভাজনের ভিত্তিতে একটি মৌচাকের মৌমাছিক…
কেমন আছো সবাই হুমম? এডমিশন জার্নি শুরু হয়ে গেলো তো নাকি। মনে রেখো, যুদ্ধে যাওয়া ঘোড়া কখনো বিয়েতে নাচে না! আর হ্যাঁ, অবশ্যই নিজের শরীর-স্বাস্থ্যের দিকে খেয়াল রাখিয়ো। সৃষ্টিকর্তাকে বেশি বেশি স্মরণ করিও। 🖤
❤45❤🔥3🫡1
Signed Pinnacle Vaiya (Farsim)
Showing the 12 most recent of 28 posts we hold for @BiologyBEE. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Polls
The 5 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 28 most recent posts we hold, published 29 July 2026 to 2 September 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Forward network
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 1 October 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
SABAS Study Materials @SABASPoll · 22,945 Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 69 here — alongside 68 others — read 21 September 2026
GK Phobia।Exam Mate @ConfusingQuestions8 · 58,353 Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 51 here — alongside 50 others — read 29 August 2026
ATLAS Official @MediAtlas · 27,383 Telegram ranks this channel #6 of 77 here — alongside 76 others — read 14 September 2026
Biology Phobia।Exam Mate @ConfusingQuestions5 · 28,566 Telegram ranks this channel #12 of 65 here — alongside 64 others — read 10 September 2026
Physics Phobia(Exam Mate) @ConfusingQuestions7 · 19,107 Telegram ranks this channel #15 of 70 here — alongside 69 others — read 4 October 2026
Chemistry Phobia।Exam Mate @ConfusingQuestions4 · 24,890 Telegram ranks this channel #15 of 66 here — alongside 65 others — read 16 September 2026
This channel appears in 6 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 17 October 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Biology BEE by SABAS” (@BiologyBEE), 19,334 subscribers as measured 17 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/BiologyBEE.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.
