Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Бинариум

Channel

Бинариум

@Binarium_Official_io

On this record: Topic · Observations · Also posting the same content · Growth · Engagement · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

10,836subscribers

-1,309 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001258277924
TypeChannel
Username@Binarium_Official_io
Created3 December 2019measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live18 September 2026
Measurements held32
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 18 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/Binarium_Official_io

Topic

Crypto & trading — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 88% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Observations

These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.

Content that also appears on other registered channels

Posts published here appear word for word on 2 other registered channels. The matching is on the text itself, not on Telegram’s forward marker, so it finds a copy whether or not it was labelled as one.

Matching posts — open both and compare (6 of the pairs behind the counts below)
Posted firstThenOverlapGap
@Binarium_Official_io/3287 · this entry14 Jul 2026, 13:05 UTC@binariumsignaIs/185014 Jul 2026, 13:05 UTC1.00under a minute
@Binarium_Official_io/3288 · this entry15 Jul 2026, 13:33 UTC@binariumsignaIs/185115 Jul 2026, 13:33 UTC1.00under a minute
@Binarium_Official_io/3291 · this entry21 Jul 2026, 13:06 UTC@binariumsignaIs/185421 Jul 2026, 13:06 UTC1.00under a minute
@Binarium_Official_io/3295 · this entry29 Jul 2026, 13:12 UTC@binariumsignaIs/185729 Jul 2026, 13:12 UTC1.00under a minute
@Binarium_Official_io/3296 · this entry31 Jul 2026, 12:22 UTC@binariumsignaIs/185831 Jul 2026, 12:22 UTC1.00under a minute
@Binarium_Official_io/3304 · this entry6 Aug 2026, 15:34 UTC@binariumsignaIs/18616 Aug 2026, 15:34 UTC1.00under a minute
Every channel this entry shares post bodies with
ChannelMatching postsText overlapTypical gapPublished first
@binariumsignaIs6 (6/6 hand-verifiable sample passed)1.00under a minute@binariumsignaIs (42)
@PocketOption_Official_io6 (6/6 hand-verifiable sample passed)1.00under a minute@PocketOption_Official_io (42)

Text overlap is the Jaccard coefficient over the set of distinct three-word phrases in the two bodies: 1.00 is identical wording, and the threshold for counting a pair at all is 0.70. Candidates are generated by simhash LSH (4 x 16-bit bands, exact Hamming <= 3) verified against the bodies with Jaccard over the SET of distinct 3-word shingles. Published first counts which side of each matching pair carries the earlier timestamp — in this corpus, which is the limitation directly below.

What this cannot establish

MEASURED, DOMINANT ERROR SOURCE: a post ingested before 2026-08-06 may have carried a forward header that was not recorded. A 45-pair hand-check against live t.me pages found 14 (31%) where the live page shows a forward header naming the other channel and the database has none, plus 4 more (9%) naming a third party. The text match itself was wrong 0 times out of 45. Read attribution_capture.items_in_trusted_window before treating the unattributed count as a claim.

Telegram lets a channel forward a post with a header naming the source, and we only began reliably recording that header on 2026-08-06. 2 of the 8 matches recorded here fall after that date and carried no header when we read them. The rest predate reliable capture and are not evidence either way.

“Published first” means first in this corpus. We hold 7 comparable posts for this entry, running 14 July 2026 to 6 August 2026. A channel we have read one page deep will look younger than a neighbour we have read in full, and the order would flip with no change in the underlying facts.

The detector’s own notes on this observation, as it recorded them. Names in this_style are fields of the underlying evidence record, which the plain-English paragraphs above read out for this entry.

  • Verbatim republication has three causes and the text separates only two: a clone/mirror, unattributed copy-paste, or BOTH channels copying a common third source that neither attributes. The spread filter (content held by at most 8 channels) reduces the third and does not remove it.
  • 'Earliest' means earliest IN THIS CORPUS. A channel ingested one page deep will look younger than a neighbour ingested in full; corpus_coverage above is there to be checked before the direction is believed.
  • shared_verified_est extrapolates the sampled pass rate over the full narrow match count; sampled/passed are the numbers actually measured.
  • Absence of a forward header is not proof of intent: Telegram lets a channel disable forward attribution, and a credit written in the body is not parsed as attribution here (mention_edge_either_way above is the closest available signal).

Across the whole group of 3, the earliest publisher we hold is @PocketOption_Official_io. That is a statement about our reading window, not a claim of authorship.

Recorded under the key clone_copy, last confirmed 7 August 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.

Also posting the same content

This channel’s posts match, word for word or near enough, posts on 2 other registered channels, found by comparing text fingerprints across every channel on the register. That matching has been checked by hand against the live Telegram pages and found reliable — 0 wrong of 45 pairs re-read.

Which channel, if either, published first is deliberately not shown. The same hand-check found that reading wrong 18 of 45 times — 60%, no better than a coin flip — because it depends on how deep our own crawl happened to reach into each channel’s history, not on when the content was actually first posted. This list is ordered by subscriber count, the same as every other listing on this site, never by which channel we think came first. Word-for-word matching has several ordinary explanations besides copying — a channel mirroring itself, an unattributed repost, or two channels independently repeating the same wire story — and this measurement cannot tell those apart. How this is measured.

Growth

10,83612,14511,490.57 August 2026 — 12,145 subscribers7 August 2026 — 12,145 subscribers9 August 2026 — 12,072 subscribers10 August 2026 — 12,008 subscribers11 August 2026 — 11,957 subscribers12 August 2026 — 11,899 subscribers13 August 2026 — 11,835 subscribers14 August 2026 — 11,751 subscribers16 August 2026 — 11,665 subscribers17 August 2026 — 11,583 subscribers18 August 2026 — 11,540 subscribers19 August 2026 — 11,499 subscribers20 August 2026 — 11,439 subscribers21 August 2026 — 11,401 subscribers22 August 2026 — 11,306 subscribers24 August 2026 — 11,240 subscribers25 August 2026 — 11,186 subscribers26 August 2026 — 11,164 subscribers27 August 2026 — 11,141 subscribers28 August 2026 — 11,115 subscribers29 August 2026 — 11,104 subscribers30 August 2026 — 11,096 subscribers1 September 2026 — 11,084 subscribers2 September 2026 — 11,073 subscribers3 September 2026 — 11,047 subscribers5 September 2026 — 11,025 subscribers8 September 2026 — 10,966 subscribers11 September 2026 — 10,933 subscribers13 September 2026 — 10,899 subscribers14 September 2026 — 10,871 subscribers16 September 2026 — 10,851 subscribers18 September 2026 — 10,836 subscribers7 August 202618 September 2026
32 measurements spanning 42 days, net -1,309. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 10,640–12,341 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 32
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
18 Sept 2026, 18:0110,836-15
16 Sept 2026, 12:3810,851-20
14 Sept 2026, 18:4110,871-28
13 Sept 2026, 02:2010,899-34
11 Sept 2026, 05:0010,933-33
8 Sept 2026, 11:1910,966-59
5 Sept 2026, 04:1611,025-22
3 Sept 2026, 09:5411,047-26
2 Sept 2026, 00:4711,073-11
1 Sept 2026, 00:5711,084-12
30 Aug 2026, 22:3411,096-8
29 Aug 2026, 23:0411,104-11
28 Aug 2026, 21:3511,115-26
27 Aug 2026, 18:5411,141-23
26 Aug 2026, 19:2711,164-22
25 Aug 2026, 16:0311,186-54
24 Aug 2026, 12:4711,240-66
22 Aug 2026, 19:5611,306-95
21 Aug 2026, 13:0411,401-38
20 Aug 2026, 14:4311,439first reading

Engagement

40 posts held, back to 10 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 41 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
5.40%
avg views ÷ 10,836 subscribers
Avg views / post
585
9 posts measured
Reaction rate
this channel exposes no reaction counts
Posts in window
9
of 40 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 1 September 2026
Posts held40 (10 July 20261 September 2026)
Views total5,264
Reactions total
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken3 Sept 2026, 02:06 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Recent posts

1 Sept 2026, 13:25 UTC57 viewsread 3 September 2026

Шикарная работа 15➕ и 1➖ круто отработали с хорошей прибавкой в 🏦 банк, идем отдыхать увидимся завтра.

28 Aug 2026, 17:01 UTC312 viewsread 3 September 2026
Photo

Хочешь получать прогнозы жми Старт в боте.

28 Aug 2026, 13:03 UTC413 viewsread 3 September 2026

Итоговый показатель на сегодня составляет 15➕ и 0➖. Результативный день с положительным вкладом в бюджет. На сегодня работы окончены. Всем хорошего отдыха, встречаемся в понедельник.

27 Aug 2026, 13:52 UTC845 viewsread 3 September 2026

Итог сегодня 2➖ и 14➕ хорошая работа коллеги, идём отдыхать увидимся завтра, всем хорошего вечера.

26 Aug 2026, 13:14 UTC848 viewsread 3 September 2026

Работа на сегодня завершена. Итог: 2 отрицательные сделки и 12 положительных сделок. Работа выполнена. Желаю всем хорошего вечера. До встречи завтра.

26 Aug 2026, 09:23 UTC845 viewsread 3 September 2026
Photo

Сколько стратегий вы уже бросили за последний год? То идет серия минусов, то сигналов нет часами, то просто становится скучно и хочется «попробовать что-то новое» и кажется, что пора пересмотреть систему. В итоге трейдер бросает рабочие правила и снова отправляется на поиски идеальных индикаторов. Но проблема чаще всего не в стратегии, а в ошибках, из-за которых ей не дают раскрыться. ⚠️ В картинках мы разобрали 3

25 Aug 2026, 13:24 UTC807 viewsread 3 September 2026

Итог: 0 минусов и 11 плюс. Работа выполнена успешно, банк находится в плюсе. Увидимся завтра.

25 Aug 2026, 09:07 UTC575 viewsread 3 September 2026
Photo

Хочешь получать прогнозы жми Старт в боте.

24 Aug 2026, 12:59 UTC562 viewsread 3 September 2026

Отличная работа. Итог за сегодня: 10 плюсов и 0 минусов. Чистая прибыль зачислена на банковский счет. Переходим к отдыху, встречаемся завтра.

22 Aug 2026, 09:29 UTC175 viewsread 3 September 2026

Итог 0➖ и 11➕ хорошая работа выдалась, банк в плюсе. Увидимся в понедельник, всем хороших выходных.

21 Aug 2026, 05:00 UTC231 viewsread 3 September 2026
Photo

Тому ли человеку вы доверяете? Макс снова возвращается к уже знакомым событиям и замечает то, что раньше казалось неважным. Теперь многие выводы приходится поставить под сомнение. 📩 Новое SMS лишь усиливает ощущение, что разгадка гораздо ближе, чем кажется. Но сможет ли Макс увидеть то, что все это время было у него перед глазами?😳 Ответы и новые загадки ждут вас в 6-м эпизоде «Предатель»!

20 Aug 2026, 16:29 UTC183 viewsread 3 September 2026
Photo

📉Цена касается линий Боллинджера, RSI показывает разворот… но достаточно ли этого для открытия сделки? Каждый индикатор показывает свою часть рыночной картины. Когда их сигналы совпадают, вероятность ложного сигнала снижается, а точку входа становится проще определить. На картинках разбираем простую комбинацию RSI + линии Боллинджера, которая помогает находить потенциальные развороты и подтверждать направление сдел

Showing the 12 most recent of 40 posts we hold for @Binarium_Official_io. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 18 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Бинариум” (@Binarium_Official_io), 10,836 subscribers as measured 18 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Binarium_Official_io.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.