Channel
@Bilan_pro
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry
5,038subscribers
-2 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001617557915 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @Bilan_pro |
| Description | Услуги: 💰 Консультации Покупка: новостройки, вторички Продажа Личка @LBilan |
| Created | Between 1 December 2021 and 31 March 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 11 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 11 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/Bilan_pro |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 11 Aug 2026, 12:49 | 5,038 | -2 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 15:03 | 5,040 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 17:48 | 5,040 | first reading |
15 posts held, back to 16 June 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 7 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 6 of 7 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 11 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 15 (16 June 2026 – 11 August 2026) |
| Views total | 942 |
| Reactions total | 43 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 12 Aug 2026, 04:54 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 12 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
77 reactions across 11 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 46.8% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🔥 | 36 | 46.8% | |
| 👍 | 23 | 29.9% | |
| ❤🔥 | 10 | 13.0% | |
| 👏 | 5 | 6.49% | |
| custom 5224607267797606837 | 3 | 3.90% |
Custom emoji. One row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The count beside it isTelegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 12 of the 15 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 77reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 15 most recent posts we hold, published 16 June 2026 to 11 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
На что вы обращаетесь внимание на просмотре квартиры, кроме самой квартиры? Большинство покупателей на просмотре смотрят: ремонт, окна, сантехнику, вид из окна, мебель, которую оставит продавец. Я смотрю ещё и на следы истории квартиры. Потому что иногда именно обстановка заставляет задать вопрос, которого не было бы ни в одном стандартном чек-листе. Одна очень показательная история при работе с покупателем. По …
👍2🔥1
Вопрос к покупателям. Интересно ваша мнение #покупателю@Bilan_pro #вторичка@Bilan_pro @Bilan_pro
🔥5
Я люблю писать тексты, высказывать все мнение и ничего практически не публикую из вариантов, т.к новостроек около 29 тысяч, только в Новосибирске. Работаю по заявке. А какой материал вы ожидаете в канале?
The shares total 151%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Подберите мне варианты. А работа уже началась или ещё нет? Как вы считаете? Вот мне действительно интересно. Человек пишет риэлтору: Нужна новостройка. Пришлите варианты. Хорошо. Но давайте сначала определимся. Прислать вам варианты — это уже работа или ещё нет? Если это не работа — тогда почему вы обращаетесь к незнакомому человеку, чтобы он потратил на вас своё время и поделился с вами своими профессиональн…
❤🔥5👍3
Моя ошибка. Эта ошибка стоила мне многих часов бесплатных консультаций. И что удивительно, ожесточенных споров, со стороны того, кто обратился. Людмила, посмотрите договор. Всё ли там нормально? Раньше я сразу начинала отвечать. И это была моя ошибка. Я открывала договор, начинала объяснять риски, задавать вопросы, рассказывать, что нужно проверить, пытаясь докопаться вглубь. Через 10 минут человек начинал со мн…
🔥8❤🔥3
Я ищу причины не покупать квартиру. Хотя я риэлтор. И да, это моя философия работы. Кстати, однажды я услышала фразу от клиента, Давай Людмиле пока не будем звонить. Она сейчас начнёт нас отговаривать. И да, он был прав. Если я вижу риск и негативные последствия для покупателя, я действительно буду отговаривать. Да, я могу потерять эту сделку. Ну что поделать. Клиент сам принимает решение. Я своё мнение сказала. …
👍4👏2
Продавец, который продаёт квартиру самостоятельно, ненавидит риэлтора всего в двух случаях. Первый — когда риэлтор, по мнению продавца, ничего не знает. Ты вообще риэлтор? Второй — когда риэлтор убедил своих покупателей отказаться от покупки этой квартиры, потому что, это дорога в суд, вымощеная словами и заверениями продавца. И самое прикольное: риэлтор — один и тот же человек. Просто мнение продавца резко изм…
🔥10
Покупатели квартир! Чего вы боитесь больше? Бабки, которая перевела деньги мошенникам? Или уже совершеннолетнего ребенка, который спустя годы вспомнил, что мать не выделила ему долю в квартире, купленной с использованием материнского капитала? Если вы покупаете квартиру самостоятельно, все собственники взрослые, несовершеннолетних детей нет. Кто тогда будет проверять то, чего вы даже не видите? И как будете пров…
👏3
Самая дорогая экскурсия в вашей жизни почему-то бесплатная. Хотя тут цена ошибки — ваши 5–30 млн руб. А почему обзорная экскурсия 2-5 часов в любом городе стоит 8–18 тысяч рублей, и это никого не удивляет? Гид тратит свое время, строит маршрут, организует логистику, показывает лучшие места города. При этом маршрут уже заранее подготовлен. А если экскурсия проводится индивидуально, под вас? Никому же не приходит …
🔥3👍1
Вы правда думаете, что видеофиксация сделки спасёт вас, если там бабка? Нет! Разве Долина говорила: Нет видео — значит, сделка недействительна. Ага. Она говорила о другом. Мошенничество — это повод, а ТАРАНОМ было совсем другое. Кто следил за делом и всё понял? Наивно бояться продавцов в возрасте. Вас запугали, а где бояться не сказали! Лично у меня в 1992 г. была продавец 28 лет. Сделка нотариальная. Иск подан …
👍7❤🔥2
Откуда вообще появилась эта странная практика? Я конечно знаю. Но мне интересно, что думаете вы. Ни один профессионал не работает бесплатно. Все продают своё время, опыт и профессиональные знания. Именно по этим критериям мы выбираем специалистов. Неважно каких: • парикмахеров; • автомехаников; • дизайнеров; • тренеров; • психологов; • юристов; • стилистов; • сантехников. И никто не гарантирует, что результат о…
🔥7👍6custom 52246072677976068373
Конец сказочным условиям по семейной ипотеке Осталась неделя и ещё можно успеть купить по старым условиям Пишите @LBilan #новостройки@Bilan_pro @Bilan_pro
Showing the 12 most recent of 15 posts we hold for @Bilan_pro. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
@Bilan_pro edited 1 post after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Я люблю писать тексты, высказывать все мнение и ничего практически не публикую из вариантов, т.к новостроек около 29 тысяч, только в Новосибирске. Работаю по заявке. А какой материал вы ожидаете в канале?
The shares total 151%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 15 most recent posts we hold, published 16 June 2026 to 11 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Citation-graph rank — 1,006,169 of 1,340,412entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Людмила Билан || Недвижимость Нск” (@Bilan_pro), 5,038 subscribers as measured 11 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Bilan_pro.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.