Channel
@BiladAshSham
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry
47subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001586131923 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @BiladAshSham |
| Description | Взгляд из России на события в Сирии |
| Created | 4 August 2021 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 10 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 10 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/BiladAshSham |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 10 Aug 2026, 13:46 | 47 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 19:47 | 47 | first reading |
16 posts held, back to 25 April 2022 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 16 posts for this entry, the most recent from 30 March 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 10 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
16 reactions across 6 posts, in 1 kind.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👍 | 16 | 100.0% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 6 of the 16 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 16reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 16 most recent posts we hold, published 25 April 2022 to 30 March 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Радикальный исламизм идеально приспособлен для того, чтобы его воспринял полудикий полумодернизированный человек 📌 Передача «Разговор с мудрецом» на радио «Звезда» от 17 марта 2025 года 📖 Читать полностью: https://rossaprimavera.ru/article/cc96ad1c @ia_rossa ✍️ #ИАКВ #ИАКВ_аналитика #Кургинян
👍2
🇸🇾Структура новой сирийской армии Дамаск не имеет никаких рычагов воздействия на многие независимые вооруженные группировки и не может предоставить им никаких стимулов для отказа от той власти, которой они обладают в настоящее время, и не может в значительной степени набирать людей напрямую в свои собственные новые подразделения (см пост выше) . Ни одна из этих фракций не достаточно сильна, чтобы бросить вызов ХТШ*…
Американская журналистка Линдси Снелл в комментарии ИА Красная Весна заявила, что считает визит Башара Асада в Оман символическим. По ее мнению, это означает фактическую победу сирийских властей в войне. 📌 Визит Башара Асада в Оман означает победу Дамаска в войне. Мнение https://rossaprimavera.ru/news/6116290f
👍2
⚡️ Российской группировкой во взаимодействии с подразделениями госбезопасности и вооруженных сил САР в населенном пункте ДЖАСИМ провинции ДЕРЪА на юге Сирийской Арабской Республики проведена специальная операция по ликвидации боевиков ИГИЛ, причастных к совершению 13 октября террористического акта - подрыва автобуса с военнослужащими 4 танковой дивизии ВС САР в населенном пункте САБУРА провинции ДАМАСК, в результате …
После недавних событий на фронте СВО, Вы подозреваете предательство в российских верхах?
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
#СИРИЯ #ИДЛИБ Моя новая большая аналитическая статья для Российского совета по международным делам (РСМД) о военно-политической ситуации в сирийском Идлибе, удерживаемом ХТШ*, который продолжает усиливаться; и районах Северного Алеппо, контролируемых Сирийской национальной армией (СНА), которая начала фрагментироваться, как и все ее предшественницы. В первой части работы затронул процессы идеологической трансформац…
👍3
Пентагон заявил, что военная операция Турции в Сирии может привести к бегству из курдских тюрем тысяч боевиков ИГИЛ (организация, деятельность которой запрещена в РФ). Если читать это заявление не так, как предлагается самими США (что мол они категорически против такого варианта развития события), а по факту (что Вашингтон опирается на исламистские силы в борьбе с Асадом), то можно сказать, что Пентагон косвенно одо…
👍1
Photo, posted without a caption
👍3
Вряд ли еще какой президент так свободно может в народ ходить 👍💪 (Асад впервые за долгое время посетил Алеппо)
Сирия заявила о готовности признать ДНР и ЛНР уже давно. Но почему медлят — не ясно https://t.me/bbbreaking/127200
#ТУРЦИЯ #СИРИЯ Проблема (для США) в том, что Эрдоган совсем не нуждается в американском согласии молчаливом или любом ином для проведения операции, допустим, в Тель-Рифаат. Точно также как Эрдоган не нуждался в американском согласии на проведения операции «Оливковая ветвь» в Африне. США там не присутствуют и никогда не присутствовали, не предоставляли этим регионам никакого «зонтика безопасности» и никак не могут…
Другое видео с учений в Сирии, только уже от нашего Минобороны: https://t.me/mod_russia/16753
Showing the 12 most recent of 16 posts we hold for @BiladAshSham. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
После недавних событий на фронте СВО, Вы подозреваете предательство в российских верхах?
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 16 most recent posts we hold, published 25 April 2022 to 30 March 2025. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Сирийский фактор” (@BiladAshSham), 47 subscribers as measured 10 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/BiladAshSham.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.