❤️专注秀人网红❤️ 更多秀人视频已更新至会员 真实运行5年 绝对有保障 始终提供优质秀人资源 进秀人会员请点击👉@cuicuihua2 (支持微信/支付宝 口令红包) ——————————————— 🔥限时特惠🔥 ❤️会员群🚪 只要98❤️ ——————————————— 本群已运行5年 绝对有保障 会员群视频已更新万+所有视频都是精选高清原版视频 进群即享受 每天更新 持续更新 付款后拉你进会员群 …
❤1

Channel
@BijeongA1
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
23,624subscribers
+2,309 since we began measuring on 14 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.
| Telegram ID | -1003705293386 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @BijeongA1 |
| Created | Between 1 February 2026 and 31 July 2026 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 14 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 17 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 26 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 17 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/BijeongA1 |
Adult — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 99% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 17 Sept 2026, 17:41 | 23,624 | +109 |
| 15 Sept 2026, 18:17 | 23,515 | +128 |
| 13 Sept 2026, 23:16 | 23,387 | +158 |
| 12 Sept 2026, 08:38 | 23,229 | +197 |
| 10 Sept 2026, 02:01 | 23,032 | +211 |
| 6 Sept 2026, 22:40 | 22,821 | +183 |
| 4 Sept 2026, 09:41 | 22,638 | +116 |
| 2 Sept 2026, 23:14 | 22,522 | +81 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 20:05 | 22,441 | +66 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 17:12 | 22,375 | +73 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 18:58 | 22,302 | +91 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 19:42 | 22,211 | +98 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 19:17 | 22,113 | +61 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 20:53 | 22,052 | +57 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 21:34 | 21,995 | +34 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 01:05 | 21,961 | +51 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 03:42 | 21,910 | +68 |
| 23 Aug 2026, 17:43 | 21,842 | +129 |
| 22 Aug 2026, 00:48 | 21,713 | +63 |
| 20 Aug 2026, 19:52 | 21,650 | first reading |
83 posts held, back to 8 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 54 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 23 of 43 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 2 September 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 83 (8 August 2026 – 2 September 2026) |
| Views total | 132,930 |
| Reactions total | 34 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 3 Sept 2026, 12:47 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Measured directly from 76 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
65 reactions across 35 posts, in 3 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 90.8% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 59 | 90.8% | |
| 👍 | 5 | 7.69% | |
| 🍌 | 1 | 1.54% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 44 of the 83 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 65 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 83 most recent posts we hold, published 8 August 2026 to 2 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
❤️专注秀人网红❤️ 更多秀人视频已更新至会员 真实运行5年 绝对有保障 始终提供优质秀人资源 进秀人会员请点击👉@cuicuihua2 (支持微信/支付宝 口令红包) ——————————————— 🔥限时特惠🔥 ❤️会员群🚪 只要98❤️ ——————————————— 本群已运行5年 绝对有保障 会员群视频已更新万+所有视频都是精选高清原版视频 进群即享受 每天更新 持续更新 付款后拉你进会员群 …
❤1
#网红 #秀人 #甜妮 透视蕾丝真空露点情趣睡裙 女上啪啪啪 进会员私聊👉@cuicuihua2
❤2
#网红 #秀人 #凌七七 黑色连体吊带背心 进会员私聊👉@cuicuihua2
#网红 #秀人 #孙梦瑶 [YouMi]尤蜜视频 梦中情人 孙梦瑶
Telegram必备的搜索引擎,极搜JISOU帮你精准找到,想要的群组、频道、视频、音乐 👉 t.me/jisou2?start=a_657274949
#网红 #秀人 #艾小青 [YouMi]尤蜜视频 梦幻迷情 艾小青
❤1
❤️专注秀人网红❤️ 更多秀人视频已更新至会员 真实运行5年 绝对有保障 始终提供优质秀人资源 进秀人会员请点击👉@cuicuihua2 (支持微信/支付宝 口令红包) ——————————————— 🔥限时特惠🔥 ❤️会员群🚪 只要98❤️ ——————————————— 本群已运行5年 绝对有保障 会员群视频已更新万+所有视频都是精选高清原版视频 进群即享受 每天更新 持续更新 付款后拉你进会员群 …
#网红 #秀人 #是小逗逗 性感黑色连体情趣 进会员私聊👉@cuicuihua2
❤2
#网红 #秀人 #杨晨晨 性感黑丝牛仔
❤3
#网红 #秀人 #阿依莎 性感蓝色抹胸长裙 进会员私聊👉@cuicuihua2
❤1
#网红 #秀人 #朱可儿 性感古风透视汉服 进会员私聊👉@cuicuihua2
❤1
#网红 #秀人 #糯美子 性感蓝色吊带内衣 进会员私聊👉@cuicuihua2
Showing the 12 most recent of 83 posts we hold for @BijeongA1. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 17 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“秀人抖音网红模特大全” (@BijeongA1), 23,624 subscribers as measured 17 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/BijeongA1.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.