Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

Bid & Offer

@BidAndOffer

On this record: Previous handles · Growth · Engagement · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

1,841subscribers

-2 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001370249854
TypeChannel
Username@BidAndOffer
Created30 July 2018measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live12 August 2026
Measurements held3
Confirmed unchanged2 times, most recently 12 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/BidAndOffer

Previous handles

Recorded in 2019 as “Bid&Offer — the title held for this same channel (matched by Telegram id, not by handle) in the Pushshift Telegram Dataset, a third-party archive captured in 2019-2020, years before this register made its own first observation. CC BY 4.0, Baumgartner, Zannettou, Squire & Blackburn (2020), Zenodo. A third party’s dated snapshot, not a measurement this register made itself.

Growth

1,8411,8431,8426 August 2026 — 1,843 subscribers6 August 2026 — 1,843 subscribers9 August 2026 — 1,841 subscribers6 August 20269 August 2026
3 measurements spanning 4 days, net -2. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 1,841–1,843 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
9 Aug 2026, 23:371,841-2
6 Aug 2026, 13:261,843no change
6 Aug 2026, 06:491,843first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 5 September 2025the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 2 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
19.9%
avg views ÷ 1,841 subscribers
Avg views / post
367
1 post measured
Reaction rate
this channel exposes no reaction counts
Posts in window
1
of 20 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 30 July 2026
Posts held20 (5 September 202530 July 2026)
Views total367
Reactions total
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken7 Aug 2026, 17:26 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Recent posts

30 Jul 2026, 17:38 UTC367 viewsread 7 August 2026
Photo

И что это сегодня было в валюте? Конкретно в Si: в обед вылили 50 тыс контрактов, а вечером устроили сквиз на 1%.

15 Jul 2026, 15:49 UTC729 viewsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Для истории. Индекс - двойное дно. Маржинколы по 2 эшелону.

6 Jul 2026, 13:29 UTC≈1,050 viewsread 7 August 2026

Как то буднично, 26238 сходил +-2%, Алроса ушла ниже 20 руб. за акцию, в ВТБ маржинколл ниже цены допэмиссии...

3 Jul 2026, 15:20 UTC≈1,030 viewsread 7 August 2026

С начала этой недели, а по факту квартала и полугодия, мы увидели достаточно резвый слив валюты. Еще тогда показалось, что затащили на неликвидных торгах повыше на закрытии месяца, квартала и полугодия и теперь сливают. Всю неделю сливали валюту, в один из дней прошли крупные продажи на минимумах дня. Держали и сегодня… до вечера. А в моменте неделю на фьючерсах закрывают близко к нулю. И опять на неликвиде. Кажется,

29 Jun 2026, 06:37 UTC≈1,170 viewsread 7 August 2026

Как Вам волатильность фьючерсов на валюту с утра? +0,5%, -1%, +1%... Не говоря уж о том, как слили валюту под вечер пятницы. Волатильность только нарастает. Падает уже все: акции, ОФЗ, рубль. Теперь кажется надо следить за корпоративными облигациями. Условный РЖД дает меньше доходность чем ОФЗ... Еще одна гипотеза: смотреть на большие прошедшие объемы в ОФЗ и смотреть на реакцию в валюте.

22 Jun 2026, 12:51 UTC≈1,250 viewsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Очередной разгромный день в акциях и ОФЗ. И только рубль крепок.

19 Jun 2026, 10:13 UTC≈1,310 viewsread 7 August 2026

Ну что, заседание ЦБ!? Кажется, волатильность может быть высокой на решении, т.к. впервые за долгое время большой разброс по ожиданиям: от сохранения ставки до снижения на 1 п.п. А все потому, что факторы максимально разнонаправленные: инфляция и ожидания, волатильность нефтянки на внешнем и внутреннем рынке, дефицит бюджета, да и сам рынок низко. На что будет опираться ЦБ в этот раз?

29 Apr 2026, 14:29 UTC≈1,600 viewsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Разгром на рынке акций. На рынке именно акций, потому что облигации и рубль - в плюсе. И что это ? расстройство от ставки и прогноза или что то другое?

9 Mar 2026, 15:32 UTC≈1,750 viewsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Продолжаем болеть за наш бюджет через рублевую цену бочки нефти. Сегодня было почти +30%, но по дню (а Brent менее суток продержался в трехзначном значении пока) почти без изменений. После такого, что рост, что падение нефти дальше будет приводить к падению рубля?

6 Mar 2026, 09:16 UTC≈1,620 viewsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Что у нас к концу недели? +50% рублевая бочка со дна в середине декабря и +20% за неделю. Комбо нефти и ослабления рубля.

2 Mar 2026, 11:29 UTC≈1,570 viewsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Рублевая цена бочки сегодня +11% на такой динамике нефти и рубля(!). На объем продажи валюты в марте это уже не повлияет, а на апрель (при прочих равных_ влияние уже значимое может быть. Плюсом сюда будет возможное изменение бюджетного правила примерно к этому моменту (20 числа марта?).

18 Feb 2026, 12:51 UTC≈1,410 viewsread 7 August 2026

Не думаете, что конвертация префов ВТБ не может происходить по текущей рыночной цене в обычке. Как бы не считали при оценке, цена может быть ниже. И тогда цена АО припадет...

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @BidAndOffer. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 1,266,226 of 1,480,688entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 9 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Bid & Offer” (@BidAndOffer), 1,841 subscribers as measured 9 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/BidAndOffer.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.