Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Німецько-український Біблійний канал

Channel

Німецько-український Біблійний канал

@Bibelstudium_Deutsch

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry

2,476subscribers

+7 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001462786427
TypeChannel
Username@Bibelstudium_Deutsch
Created2 October 2020measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded5 September 2026
Last confirmed live15 September 2026
Measurements held12
Confirmed unchanged2 times, most recently 15 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/Bibelstudium_Deutsch

Topic

Religion — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 15 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

2,4692,4812,4756 August 2026 — 2,469 subscribers10 August 2026 — 2,471 subscribers13 August 2026 — 2,473 subscribers16 August 2026 — 2,477 subscribers19 August 2026 — 2,481 subscribers22 August 2026 — 2,480 subscribers25 August 2026 — 2,473 subscribers31 August 2026 — 2,477 subscribers3 September 2026 — 2,473 subscribers5 September 2026 — 2,473 subscribers8 September 2026 — 2,474 subscribers12 September 2026 — 2,476 subscribers2,4766 August 202612 September 2026
12 measurements spanning 37 days, net +7. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 2,467–2,483 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
12 Sept 2026, 09:552,476+2
8 Sept 2026, 12:172,474+1
5 Sept 2026, 13:222,473no change
3 Sept 2026, 09:362,473-4
31 Aug 2026, 03:422,477+4
25 Aug 2026, 16:522,473-7
22 Aug 2026, 18:552,480-1
19 Aug 2026, 12:452,481+4
16 Aug 2026, 21:542,477+4
13 Aug 2026, 18:172,473+2
10 Aug 2026, 06:442,471+2
6 Aug 2026, 13:212,469first reading

Engagement

19 posts held, back to 22 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
7.71%
avg views ÷ 2,476 subscribers
Avg views / post
191
2 posts measured
Reaction rate
5.50%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
2
of 19 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 30 August 2026
Posts held19 (22 July 202630 August 2026)
Views total382
Reactions total21
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken5 Sept 2026, 13:22 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

119 reactions across 16 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 73.1% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
8773.1%
🔥1916.0%
😁75.88%
🥰43.36%
🤩21.68%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 16 of the 19 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 119 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 22 July 2026 to 30 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

30 Aug 2026, 12:50 UTC132 views12 reactionsread 5 September 2026
Photo

Перш ніж здаватися, згадай, заради чого ти все починав.

🔥84

25 Aug 2026, 04:22 UTC250 views9 reactionsread 5 September 2026
Photo

Die Himmel erzählen die Herrlichkeit Gottes, und die Ausdehnung verkündigt das Werk seiner Hände. Psalmen 19:2 Небо звіщає про Божую славу, а про чин Його рук розказує небозвід. Псалми 19:2 ♦ Der Himmel - небо; ♦ erzählen - розповідати, звіщати; ♦ die Herrlichkeit - слава; ♦ die Ausdehnung - небозвід; ♦ verkündig - проголошувати; розповідати; ♦ das Werk - твір, витвір; ♦ die Hand - рука.

9

16 Aug 2026, 17:40 UTC≈1,770 views11 reactionsread 5 September 2026
Photo

Найпоширеніша, після німецької, національність у землях Німеччини Джерело t.me/Bibelstudium_Deutsch

11

16 Aug 2026, 11:12 UTC295 viewsread 5 September 2026
Poll

Das ist...

  1. Der Roggen14%
  2. Der Weizen77%
  3. Die Gerste9%
  4. Die Hirse0%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

10 Aug 2026, 12:22 UTC390 views15 reactionsread 5 September 2026

Трішки гумору вам в стрічку☺️: 🔷 Отруйні змії Treffen sich zwei Schlangen. Fragt die Eine: - Du! Bin ich eigentlich giftig? - Keine Ahnung. Warum? - Ich habe mir gerade auf die Zunge gebissen! 🔶 Переклад: Зустрічаються дві змії. Одна запитує: - Слухай, а я взагалі отруйна? - Гадки не маю. А навіщо питаєш? - Та я тільки що язика прикусила! 🔷 Хитрий садівник Ein Gespräch zwischen Gärtnern: - Wenn man nett mit den Pf

😁7🔥5🤩21

6 Aug 2026, 15:29 UTC342 views9 reactionsread 5 September 2026
Photo

Трохи літа в стрічку)

7🔥2

30 Jul 2026, 11:07 UTC474 views18 reactionsread 5 September 2026
Photo

Божа благодать не пов'язана з нашими здібностями, заслугами чи зусиллями. Це дар, який Він постійно дарує нам у ті моменти, коли наші людські зусилля досягають своїх меж. © Андреас Кайпер

17🔥1

27 Jul 2026, 07:16 UTC422 views5 reactionsread 5 September 2026
Poll

Що принесли 12 розвідників із обіцяного краю?

  1. Weintraube, Feigen, Apfel16%
  2. Feigen, Erdbeere, Birne0%
  3. Weintraube, Granatäpfel, Feigen71%
  4. Weintraube, Feigen, Erdbeere12%

Shares as published, totalling 99%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

5

Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @Bibelstudium_Deutsch. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The 4 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

16 Aug 2026, 11:12 UTCAnonymous Quiz64 voters

Das ist...

  1. Der Roggen14%
  2. Der Weizen77%
  3. Die Gerste9%
  4. Die Hirse0%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

27 Jul 2026, 07:16 UTCAnonymous Quiz83 voters

Das ist ...

  1. Die Himbeere4%
  2. Die Erdbeere2%
  3. Die Traube87%
  4. Die Brombeere7%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

27 Jul 2026, 07:16 UTCAnonymous Quiz73 voters

Що принесли 12 розвідників із обіцяного краю?

  1. Weintraube, Feigen, Apfel16%
  2. Feigen, Erdbeere, Birne0%
  3. Weintraube, Granatäpfel, Feigen71%
  4. Weintraube, Feigen, Erdbeere12%

Shares as published, totalling 99%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

22 Jul 2026, 09:56 UTCAnonymous Quiz52 voters

Wie reagierten die Leute, als Jesus über die Tochter des Jairus sagte, dass sie nur schliefe?

  1. Sie stimmten ihm zu8%
  2. Sie lachten ihn aus73%
  3. Sie schickten ihn raus15%
  4. Sie gingen4%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 22 July 2026 to 30 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Німецько-український Біблійний канал” (@Bibelstudium_Deutsch), 2,476 subscribers as measured 12 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Bibelstudium_Deutsch.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.