МАГАЗИН Apple & Dyson №1.
Нас выбирают за премиум качество.
👨🏻💻Менеджер по всем вопросам - @bezpmanager
Обзоры - https://t.me/bezprovodov_overview
Отзывы - https://t.me/bezprovodov_review
📱IG (178k) https://instagram.com/bez.provodov174
Created
Between 1 April 2019 and 30 September 2021— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
19 measurements spanning 20 days, net -2,902. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 88,716–92,518 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
27 Aug 2026, 05:49
89,177
-31
26 Aug 2026, 09:08
89,208
+53
25 Aug 2026, 06:18
89,155
-57
24 Aug 2026, 09:32
89,212
-33
22 Aug 2026, 17:54
89,245
-94
21 Aug 2026, 08:05
89,339
-40
20 Aug 2026, 09:23
89,379
-35
19 Aug 2026, 09:24
89,414
-27
18 Aug 2026, 11:02
89,441
-51
17 Aug 2026, 12:15
89,492
-253
16 Aug 2026, 01:55
89,745
-1,922
14 Aug 2026, 08:37
91,667
-83
12 Aug 2026, 22:36
91,750
-100
11 Aug 2026, 20:16
91,850
-48
10 Aug 2026, 21:01
91,898
-66
9 Aug 2026, 19:31
91,964
-48
8 Aug 2026, 20:52
92,012
-52
7 Aug 2026, 19:11
92,064
-15
7 Aug 2026, 12:45
92,079
first reading
Engagement
85 posts held, back to 3 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 45 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
2.26%
avg views ÷ 89,177 subscribers
Avg views / post
2,020
85 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.325%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
85
of 85 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 79 of 85 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 27 August 2026
Posts held
85 (3 August 2026 – 27 August 2026)
Views total
171,597
Reactions total
532
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
27 Aug 2026, 12:57 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
≈3,540
Videos
≈1,590
Links
≈1,300
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 27 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Video runtime
11m 07s
Average length
29s
Measured directly from 23 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
532 reactions across 79 posts, in 9 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 78.4% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
🔥
417
78.4%
custom 5449800250032143374
27
5.08%
custom 5449468596952507859
24
4.51%
custom 5230993398835455804
17
3.20%
custom 5427115319401408320
14
2.63%
custom 5323478037721784625
12
2.26%
custom 5456140674028019486
11
2.07%
custom 5404476009913288096
7
1.32%
custom 5426844556073129583
3
0.564%
Custom emoji. 8 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 79 of the 85 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 532reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 85 most recent posts we hold, published 3 August 2026 to 27 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
1
across the posts below
Posts paid on
1
of 85 we hold a reading for · 1%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @Bezprovodov174. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 85 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 3 August 2026 to 27 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
БОЛЕЕ 100+ ПОСЫЛОК ОТПРАВЛЯЕМ СЕГОДНЯ!
На видео — больше 100 собранных посылок. И, судя по курсу доллара, ребята оформили заказы очень вовремя.
Доллар снова пошёл вверх, новые закупки уже обходятся дороже. Как только закончатся остатки, купленные по старому курсу, цены придётся поднимать.
Поэтому если давно откладывали покупку — лучше написать нам сейчас. Проверим наличие и зафиксируем сегодняшнюю цену 💜
Оформить…
Что?
Да-да, вот так вот смело мы роняем цены на новые товары
Умные очки с камерой → 8,990₽(цена до пятницы), вместо 11500₽.
Совет для тех, кто откладывает покупку - доллар дико набирает обороты с каждым днем, означает только одно, повышение цен в скором времени.
Успеть по ценам 2021 года, напиши:
@bezpmanager
Бухгалтер сегодня попросила показать промежуточный отчёт по распродаже.
Показали.
Судя по её лицу, фраза «С такими ценами бизнесу п***ец» была не просто красивым заголовком 😂
Но назад дороги уже нет: распродажа в самом разгаре, условия не меняем и работаем до 28 августа включительно.
Пока бухгалтер приходит в себя, мы продолжаем принимать заказы.
ЦЕНЫ ТУТ.
Оформить заказ:
@bezpmanager
ЭТО САМЫЕ НИЗКИЕ ЦЕНЫ, КОТОРЫЕ МЫ СТАВИЛИ В 2026 ГОДУ.
Мы снизил цены ниже плинтуса НА ВЕСЬ ПРАЙС.
Друзья, кто планировал покупку, не советую откладывать, потому что в скором времени, цены будут выше обычных, курс доллара не радует от слова совсем!
26–28 августа — только 3 дня. После этого прайс закрываем и возвращаем обычные цены.
Если давно хотели что-то купить — дешевле в этом году цены будут вряд ли...
*Доп …
ВСЕ...
Уже завтра, в 12:00 мы начинаем нашу масштабную
Ловите небольшой спойлер, чтобы примерно понимать какие завтра будут цены👍
Полный прайс откроем завтра ровно в 12:00. Не забыли поставить напоминалку?)
И да — ниже этих цен в этом году у нас ещё не было.
Прайс на завтра готов.
Показали бухгалтеру — дальше всё видно по лицу 😅
Завтра в 12:00 откроем все цены.
Поставили напоминание?
Я Вам гарантирую, это будут САМЫЕ НИЗКИЕ ЦЕНЫ В ЭТОМ ГОДУ!
custom 52309933988354558045
Showing the 12 most recent of 85 posts we hold for @Bezprovodov174. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Polls
The 3 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
The shares total 108%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Пока мы не раскрыли наборы, давайте честно.
Какой подарок к покупке вы бы действительно оценили, а не убрали в дальний ящик?
Наушники50%
Смарт часы55%
Magsafe или адаптер12%
Battery pack17%
The shares total 134%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
The shares total 109%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 85 most recent posts we hold, published 3 August 2026 to 27 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 54,429 of 1,621,120entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 4 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 27 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“BEZ.PROVODOV174 | КОПИИ APPLE & DYSON” (@Bezprovodov174), 89,177 subscribers as measured 27 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Bezprovodov174.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.