30 Apr 2026, 11:25 UTC≈7,150 viewsread 15 August 2026
https://168x.club/writings/benson-sun-coinkarma-ftx-1011-liquidation 上週很開心接受了 168X 的採訪。 這次聊了 1011、聊了 FTX、聊了 CoinKarma、也聊了我對 2026 的看法。算是把這幾年的事一次講完。 推薦給還在市場裡的朋友。
Channel
Benson's Trading Desk
@BensonTradingDesk
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
17,113subscribers
-51 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001149455236 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @BensonTradingDesk |
| Description | founder of coinkarma.co |
| Created | Between 1 May 2017 and 31 August 2020— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 14 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 8 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 14 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/BensonTradingDesk |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 14 Aug 2026, 09:26 | 17,113 | -8 |
| 12 Aug 2026, 23:06 | 17,121 | -5 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 21:53 | 17,126 | -7 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 20:44 | 17,133 | -5 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 19:41 | 17,138 | -15 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 18:35 | 17,153 | -4 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 19:26 | 17,157 | -7 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 21:30 | 17,164 | first reading |
Engagement
19 posts held, back to 14 February 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 21 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 19 posts for this entry, the most recent from 30 April 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
What this channel posts
- Photos
- ≈1,190
- Videos
- ≈1
- Links
- ≈597
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 15 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Recent posts
12 Apr 2026, 05:56 UTC≈10,800 viewsread 15 August 2026
https://x.com/coinkarma_/status/2043188780346274135
21 Mar 2026, 12:10 UTC≈14,600 viewsread 15 August 2026
Photo
近期 Bitfinex whale BTC 現貨槓桿部位加/減倉 與 Overall LIQ 共振時，都是相對好的買/賣點 綠框：Bitfinex BTCUSD LONGS 加倉 + Overall LIQ 綠柱 紅框：Bitfinex BTCUSD LONGS 減倉 + Overall LIQ 負值 而且昨天美股跟黃金一起下殺的時候，BTC 沒有跟著破底，以前 BTC 通常是跟跌不跟漲，現在反過來了，代表買盤的性質可能在轉變，有獨立的資金在撐。 這波反彈應該還沒結束，熊市都連跌五個月了，三月收個漂亮的綠K不過分吧。
17 Mar 2026, 06:44 UTC≈9,440 viewsread 15 August 2026
Photo
春江水暖鴨先知，這波幣市全面反彈是有徵兆的。 月初 CK 團隊就觀察到同樣價格帶的流動性數據正在變好，然後這幾天就直接爆發了。 我們家分析師 Eric 在大漲前明牌看好 SOL/ETH/SUI，歡迎追蹤他的推特： https://x.com/ericlu_86
13 Mar 2026, 09:50 UTC≈7,950 viewsread 15 August 2026
大餅難得比美股強很多，三月行情應該不會太差
13 Mar 2026, 01:30 UTC≈7,760 viewsread 15 August 2026
Photo
有人問為什麼 Bitfinex 利率這麼高，為什麼巨鯨不去鏈上用更低的利率借錢呢？ 大額借方對利率是很敏感的，更何況 Bitfinex 巨鯨借 10-20 億美金，差 1% 一年就是1000萬美元了。 後來我發現， Bitfinex 的榜一大哥很可能就是 Tether 相關實體，因為這位大哥很常在推特吐槽 USDC... 所以我猜是這個 Tether 相關實體有足量保證金槓桿做多，但寧願在自家交易所借錢，而不是去其他地方借。這可能是出於安全考量，不敢放太多保證金在別的平台。 其中一個證據是 Bitfinex 市佔率只有幣安的5%不到，但比特幣儲備量達到幣安的 60%，除了 Tether 把自家比特幣存這裡，我想不到其他理由了，這年頭哪個大戶敢放這麼多錢在 Bitfinex 啊。 換個角度想，這對放貸方來說其實是好事，代表 Bitfinex 上有長期穩定的大額借貸需求，而且借方的信用跟資金實力都不是一般散戶能比的。 這…
11 Mar 2026, 14:02 UTC≈5,850 viewsread 15 August 2026
Photo
熊市想要穩定生息，Bitfinex 放貸是最好的選擇。 現在 Bifinex USD 的平均放貸利率是 17%左右（日利率0.047%），幣安活存只有 3%多（圖中的綠線跟黃線），其他主流交易所也差不多，差距很明顯。 如果現在放 10 萬美金在 Bitfinex 做放貸，每天大概可以領 35 美金左右的利息。一個月差不多 1000 美金，複利一年下來就是 12000 美金。 對比一下，現在美債殖利率大概是 4% 到 5%。同樣 10 萬美金，買美債一年大概只能拿 4000 - 5000 美金。差了快三倍。 這麼高的利率，會不會有風險呢？ 第一，Bitfinex 的 Margin Lending 機制跟其他交易所不一樣。借出去的錢只能在交易所內交易，沒辦法直接提領。這代表你的錢不會被借走然後人間蒸發。光這一點，就比很多其他平台的融資借貸產品更安全。 第二，Bitfinex 背後是 Tether。 Tether 很有錢大…
10 Mar 2026, 15:00 UTC≈5,590 viewsread 15 August 2026
很多人問 OpenClaw 到底可以拿來幹嘛。 有些人拿來賺錢，寫程式、做自動化、接案。 我自己的話主要是拿來改善經營公司的工作流程。 我在 Discord 上拆了不同頻道，每個頻道塞不同的 system prompt 跟 skill，對應不同的專案。寫文章的歸寫文章，寫 code 的歸寫 code，研究市場的歸研究市場。 比較複雜的專案會在 system prompt 注入專案資料夾的路徑跟專用meory庫，減少 tool use 浪費 token。 然後我把公司的 Slack、Linear、GitHub repo、還有會員群組的 Telegram group 全部串進去。 AI 會定期掃會員群組的聊天記錄，有人回報 bug 或提功能請求，它自動判斷嚴重程度，直接在 Linear 上開 ticket 派給對應的人。 還有用 Whisper 把每週的會議錄音轉成逐字稿，丟進去產生會議摘要跟 action items…
10 Mar 2026, 09:29 UTC≈5,710 viewsread 15 August 2026
Photo
相信數據的力量
6 Mar 2026, 15:51 UTC≈7,690 viewsread 15 August 2026
Photo
68K 的 LIQ 已經超過 4 了，之前 63-65K LIQ 大概也處於這個水平。 感覺摸到 74K 之後，讓整個震盪箱體往上位移了一個台階。 月線已經連五紅了，統計上來說三月收漲機率是比較高的，三月開盤是 67K 左右，離現價也沒有太遠，下好離手吧。
24 Feb 2026, 03:02 UTC≈10,600 viewsread 15 August 2026
最近 Citrini 有一篇文章在 X 上非常紅， 寫了一個 2028 年的假設情境：AI 太成功，失業率飆到 10%，S&P 跌 38%。 這篇文章能吐槽的點很多，其中一段是它把「大家能用 AI 自己寫 APP」跟「軟體公司不再被需要」直接畫上等號。 現在能用 AI 處理複雜任務、自己寫自動化、自己開發工具的人，是一個極小的圈子。從「技術上做得到」到「真的大規模擴散出去」，中間有一段非常長的路。就算哪天真的擴散了，有些軟體你也殺不掉。 GitHub 賣的不是軟體而是生態系。幾千萬開發者在上面協作、分享、維護開源專案。你用 AI 寫一個自己的版本控制系統出來，然後呢？自己一個人用嗎？ Vercel 也是一樣。它綁的是整個前端部署生態系，你自己 replicate 不了的。 類似的還有 Godaddy 跟 Stripe，例子太多了根本舉不完。真正 SaaS 的護城河是生態跟資料，而不是代碼，你沒有這些東西，寫 code …
24 Feb 2026, 02:17 UTC≈7,020 viewsread 15 August 2026
真有趣，BTC 明明就不是軟體股，可是走勢跟軟體股一個樣...
Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @BensonTradingDesk. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 620,323 of 1,478,351entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Benson's Trading Desk” (@BensonTradingDesk), 17,113 subscribers as measured 14 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/BensonTradingDesk.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.