Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

Benefactor's Channel

@Benefactor0101

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Polls · Citations · Domains linked from posts · Cite this entry

1,531,244subscribers

-14,979 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among the largest entries.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002334583240
TypeChannel
Username@Benefactor0101
DescriptionCEO of Gala
CreatedBetween 1 September 2024 and 31 March 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live12 August 2026
Measurements held6
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 12 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/Benefactor0101

Topic

Crypto & trading — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 8 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 91% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

1,531,2441,546,2231,538,733.57 August 2026 — 1,546,223 subscribers7 August 2026 — 1,544,570 subscribers9 August 2026 — 1,541,486 subscribers10 August 2026 — 1,537,513 subscribers11 August 2026 — 1,534,559 subscribers12 August 2026 — 1,531,244 subscribers7 August 202612 August 2026
6 measurements spanning 5 days, net -14,979. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 1,528,997–1,548,470 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
12 Aug 2026, 00:411,531,244-3,315
11 Aug 2026, 00:141,534,559-2,954
10 Aug 2026, 03:311,537,513-3,973
9 Aug 2026, 00:541,541,486-3,084
7 Aug 2026, 22:571,544,570-1,653
7 Aug 2026, 12:011,546,223first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 1 June 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 16 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 8 July 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Photos
25
Videos
3
Links
123

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 12 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Reaction mix

145 reactions across 19 posts, in 8 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 42.8% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
6242.8%
🔥4732.4%
🙊2315.9%
🍌64.14%
😁32.07%
😨21.38%
👍10.69%
👏10.69%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 145reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 1 June 2026 to 8 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
2
across the posts below
Posts paid on
1
of 20 we hold a reading for · 5%
Most on one post
2
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @Benefactor0101. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 20 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 1 June 2026 to 8 July 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

8 Jul 2026, 18:27 UTC≈4,670 views19 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Here is a revised version edited for maximum readability, flow, and structural clarity—perfect for an X long-form post while keeping that sharp, analytical edge. --- 🔬 Capacity Deep-Dive #1: SOL/BTC (With Live Proof) SOL is one of the most heavily traded assets on Earth, racking up $2.4 Billion in global volume over the last 24 hours. Because the SOL↔️BTC pair moves constantly across dozens of global venues, it re

14🔥2🙊2🍌1

7 Jul 2026, 15:14 UTC≈4,040 views8 reactionsread 13 August 2026
Photo

🚀 Gala Swap isn't just another DEX. It’s a powerful engine built to capture value directly from market inefficiencies, and it’s fueling a serious opportunity for liquidity providers. Here’s the breakdown on why this is a potential game-changer, especially for new pools: The Arbitrage Engine Is Already Running Let's talk about that brand-new pool you just saw launch. How does it earn anything on day one? The answer

3🔥3🍌1🙊1

4 Jul 2026, 19:29 UTC≈3,640 views10 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

🗺 The Massive, Untapped Frontier on GalaSwap Most people are completely missing the scale of the opportunity currently sitting on GalaSwap. Let’s break it down: Think of GalaSwap as a vast, newly opened map with 2,000 prime plots of digital real estate. How do we get that number? Take the top ~500 most traded tokens and pair them against the four market heavyweights: BTC, ETH, USDT, and USDC. Every single combinat

🔥52🙊2😁1

2 Jul 2026, 15:50 UTC≈3,890 views3 reactionsread 13 August 2026

🥪 "Solana has no mempool, so no MEV." It's the most-repeated myth in crypto — and it's quietly costing traders. Here's what they leave out. Yes, Solana removed the *public* mempool. But it didn't remove MEV — it just changed the door. 1️⃣ Enter Jito. Instead of a public waiting room, Solana runs an off-chain auction (Jito's block engine) where searchers submit "bundles" and tip validators to land them in a favorabl

2🙊1

1 Jul 2026, 18:43 UTC≈3,480 views7 reactionsread 13 August 2026

🤖 How an MEV bot quietly robs you on an EVM DEX — and why it can't on GalaSwap Every time you swap on Uniswap, PancakeSwap, or any EVM DEX, you're not just trading against the pool. You're trading in front of an audience of predatory bots. Here's exactly how they skim your trade, step by step: 1️⃣ You broadcast your swap. It doesn't execute instantly — it lands in the public mempool, a glass waiting room where ever

4🔥2🙊1

30 Jun 2026, 13:02 UTC≈3,000 views3 reactionsread 13 August 2026

🏞 Most chains are crowded. GalaSwap is early. Its bridge supports 400+ tokens, yet only ~2 dozen have a meaningful BTC/ETH liquidity pool today. That gap is the story. In mature DeFi, the best yields are crowded out before you hear about them — on GalaSwap, those slots are still open. Over the next 30 days we'll break down exactly what that means: how MEV works (and why we don't have it), howmuch liquidity these poo

1🔥1🙊1

29 Jun 2026, 12:58 UTC≈3,190 views8 reactionsread 12 August 2026

🏞 The Open Frontier on GalaSwap GalaSwap's bridge supports 400+ tokens. Only ~2 dozen have a real BTC/ETH liquidity pool today. Sit with that: the vast majority of bridgeable, exchange-listed assets have NO pool here yet. In most of DeFi, the best yields are crowded out before you even arrive. GalaSwap is early enough that those slots are still open. And first-mover structure is simple: the first liquidity provide

6🔥1🙊1

28 Jun 2026, 14:11 UTC≈3,750 views9 reactions2 Starsread 13 August 2026

🐋 Your Alpha Has a Leak. It's Called the Block Explorer. If you trade real size, you already know the feeling: the second your wallet moves, you've got an audience. Copy-trade bots mirror your entries. "Whale alert" feeds blast every swap. Analysts reverse-engineer your thesis from your rotations. Counter-traders fade your size. Every public trade is free alpha — for everyone but you. That's alpha decay, and on mo

5😨2🔥1🙊1

27 Jun 2026, 23:18 UTC≈3,830 views7 reactionsread 13 August 2026

🛡 "No Mempool" Doesn't Mean Safe. Here's What Solana Won't Tell You. Solana DEXs love the line: "we have no mempool, so no MEV." Sounds safe. It isn't. Solana just swapped the public mempool for something equally exploitable — an ordering auction (Jito). Searchers pay validators a tip to land "bundles," and wrap a sandwich around YOUR trade: buy ahead of you, shove the price up, let you fill high, then dump right a

4🔥2🙊1

26 Jun 2026, 22:03 UTC≈4,390 views6 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

🔥5🙊1

26 Jun 2026, 14:36 UTC≈4,610 views8 reactionsread 13 August 2026

🛡 Why GalaSwap Hits Different: No MEV. No Sandwiches. No Hidden Tax. Every time you swap on an EVM DEX — Uniswap, PancakeSwap, take your pick — your trade lands in a public mempool first. Think of it as a glass waiting room where bots can SEE your pending swap before it executes… and pounce. 🥪 It's called a sandwich attack: 1️⃣ A bot spots your buy sitting in the mempool 2️⃣ It front-runs you — buying first to

4🔥4

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @Benefactor0101. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Polls

The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

9 Jun 2026, 14:50 UTCAnonymous Poll231 voters

Would you be interested in a crypto wallet that was private?

  1. Yes! I’d pay 1000 usdc23%
  2. Yes! I’d pay 100 usdc16%
  3. Yes! If it was free56%
  4. No18%

The shares total 113%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 1 June 2026 to 8 July 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 547,888 of 1,151,006entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Domains linked from posts

2 domainsthis channel’s own posts have linked to, measured by scanning the post bodies themselves — not the channel’s description, which is the separate Declared links section below when this entry has one. Appearing here is not a claim about who runs the linked site or why the channel linked to it; an advertisement, a news citation and a malicious link all leave the same kind of row.

swap.gala.comregistrable domain: gala.com19 posts · 23 June 2026 – 4 July 2026 · example post
crimsonmandate.com4 posts · 1 June 2026 – 1 June 2026 · example post

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Benefactor's Channel” (@Benefactor0101), 1,531,244 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Benefactor0101.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.