Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Believe me

Channel

Believe me

@Believe_me

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

9,662subscribers

+668 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001112432326
TypeChannel
Username@Believe_me
CreatedBetween 1 February 2017 and 31 March 2019— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live16 August 2026
Measurements held6
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 16 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/Believe_me

Growth

8,9919,6629,326.56 August 2026 — 8,994 subscribers6 August 2026 — 8,994 subscribers7 August 2026 — 8,991 subscribers9 August 2026 — 9,173 subscribers12 August 2026 — 9,441 subscribers16 August 2026 — 9,662 subscribers6 August 202616 August 2026
6 measurements spanning 11 days, net +668. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 8,890–9,763 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
16 Aug 2026, 14:179,662+221
12 Aug 2026, 21:289,441+268
9 Aug 2026, 19:519,173+182
7 Aug 2026, 01:488,991-3
6 Aug 2026, 02:528,994no change
6 Aug 2026, 01:498,994first reading

Engagement

32 posts held, back to 27 May 2025the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 17 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
11.8%
avg views ÷ 9,662 subscribers
Avg views / post
1,140
19 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.32%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
19
of 32 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 13 August 2026
Posts held32 (27 May 202513 August 2026)
Views total21,601
Reactions total286
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken15 Aug 2026, 09:46 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

309 reactions across 26 posts, in 3 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 76.4% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
23676.4%
👍4815.5%
🔥258.09%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 26 of the 32 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 309reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 32 most recent posts we hold, published 27 May 2025 to 13 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

13 Aug 2026, 14:48 UTC489 views11 reactionsread 15 August 2026
File

بوسه هایت را نمی خواهم ... ⚜ @Believe_me .

👍65

13 Aug 2026, 07:05 UTC598 views13 reactionsread 15 August 2026

. حرکتی از جنسِ طرد شدن، که همیشه با آن روبه‌رو می‌شدم، به این معنا نبود که: «دوستت ندارم.» بلکه معنایش این بود: «تو نمی‌توانی مرا دوست داشته باشی، هرقدر هم که بخواهی. تو عاشقِ عشقت به منی؛ اما عشق تو به من، عاشقِ تو نیست.» پس درست نیست بگویم کلماتِ «دوستت دارم» را تجربه کرده‌ام. آنچه من تجربه کرده‌ام، فقط سکوتِ منتظرانه‌ای بوده که قرار بود با «دوستت دارم» گفتنِ من شکسته شود. همین. تمام چیزی که تجربه کرده‌ام؛

10🔥3

12 Aug 2026, 18:30 UTC648 views19 reactionsread 15 August 2026

... خدا ساکت تر از آن بود که انتظارش را داشتم... بختیار علی آخَرینْ اَنارِ دُنیا ⚜ @Believe_me

11🔥8

12 Aug 2026, 16:20 UTC686 views25 reactionsread 15 August 2026

. │ Perhaps our eyes need to be washed by our tears once in a while, so that we can see life with a clearer view again. │ شاید چشم‌هایمان لازم باشد هر از گاهی با اشک‌هایمان شسته شوند، تا دوباره بتوانیم زندگی را با نگاهی روشن‌تر ببینیم... ⚜ @Believe_me

25

12 Aug 2026, 06:40 UTC772 views18 reactionsread 15 August 2026

....📎 #نقل_قول بیشتر زن‌ها از خودشون می‌پرسن: چرا بچه‌دار بشم؟ تا گرسنگی بکشه؟! از سرما بلرزه و از خیانت و حقارت عذاب ببینه؟! یا از مریضی، توی میدون‌های جنگ نفله بشه؟! این زن‌ها امید ندارن که بچه‌هاشون سیر بشن و جای گرمی واسه زندگی پیدا کنن؛ امید ندارن کسی به حقوق بچه‌هاشون احترام بذاره و اون‌ها بزرگ بشن و اون‌قدر زنده بمونن تا بتونن جنگ و مریضی رو از دنیا پاک کنن. شاید این مادرها حق داشته باشن، شاید هم نه! ولی بگ

13👍5

9 Aug 2026, 15:49 UTC≈1,040 views15 reactionsread 15 August 2026
Photo

... "به جاهایی فکر می کردم که باید با هم برویم جاهای کوچکِ گُمنام که فقط بگویم با تو به آنجا رفته ام با هم آنجا غذا خوردیم، یا رقصیدیم... " عکس: فیلم تعطیلاتِ رُمی #آدری_هپبورن #گریگوری_پک ⚜ @Believe_me

9🔥6

9 Aug 2026, 06:47 UTC≈1,070 views20 reactionsread 15 August 2026

‍ ‍ #نقل_قول یک روز، وقتی به گذشته می‌نگرید، با شگفتی به یاد خواهید آورد که سال‌های تقلا و مبارزه، بهترین دوران زندگی‌تان بوده است... — منسوب به زیگموند فروید ⚜️ @Believe_me

11👍9

8 Aug 2026, 18:32 UTC≈1,100 views20 reactionsread 15 August 2026

. Who says: 'Here reigns freedom' is lying, because freedom doesn't reign! آن که می‌گوید: "این‌جا آزادی حاکم است" خود دروغ‌گویی بیش نیست، زیرا آزادی حکم نمی‌راند! #اریش_فرید 📕#فرید_فرخ_زاد ⚜ @Believe_me

14👍6

8 Aug 2026, 15:50 UTC≈1,300 views23 reactionsread 15 August 2026

. بگو چکار کنم؟ با دردی که فصل را نمی‌شناسد، با خونی که بند نمی‌آید، بگو چکار کنم؟ وقتی شادی به دم بادبادکی بند است، و غم چون سنگی، مرا در سراشیبِ یک دره دنبال می‌کند.. دلم شاخه‌ی شاتوتی، که باد، خونش را به در و دیوار پاشیده است... #رضا_بروسان ⚜ @Believe_me

20👍3

Showing the 12 most recent of 32 posts we hold for @Believe_me. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 738,140 of 1,481,243entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 16 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Believe me” (@Believe_me), 9,662 subscribers as measured 16 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Believe_me.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.