Стрим в ~18:30 где-то подрублю. Будем проходить ваши арбитражи и смотреть аккаунты.
custom 540890951567439399414custom 54472551984414519945custom 54089172852702328933custom 54093697858446717051
Signed Dfg123

Channel
@BelialRus
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Posts recorded as deleted · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry
7,799subscribers
+230 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002471659081 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @BelialRus |
| Description | Контент-мейкер по HSR, полностью поехавший на аналитике Попросить обзор аккаунта или пройти эндгейм: @SgtKrabco Ссылка на тг чат: https://t.me/+DdqYhZUk9RtlMTky https://donatty.com/sgtkrabco https://boosty.to/belhsr/donate |
| Created | Between 1 September 2024 and 31 March 2025 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 11 November 2026 |
| Measurements held | 27 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 11 November 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/BelialRus |
Gaming — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 12 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 11 Nov 2026, 08:41 | 7,799 | +14 |
| 8 Nov 2026, 00:04 | 7,785 | +7 |
| 4 Nov 2026, 16:29 | 7,778 | +6 |
| 1 Nov 2026, 11:24 | 7,772 | -2 |
| 29 Oct 2026, 17:16 | 7,774 | +5 |
| 26 Oct 2026, 16:37 | 7,769 | +7 |
| 24 Oct 2026, 00:29 | 7,762 | -9 |
| 20 Oct 2026, 20:27 | 7,771 | +6 |
| 17 Oct 2026, 11:48 | 7,765 | +1 |
| 14 Oct 2026, 07:54 | 7,764 | -7 |
| 10 Oct 2026, 20:56 | 7,771 | +17 |
| 5 Oct 2026, 03:20 | 7,754 | +50 |
| 26 Sept 2026, 04:01 | 7,704 | +144 |
| 17 Sept 2026, 07:15 | 7,560 | +2 |
| 13 Sept 2026, 13:59 | 7,558 | +3 |
| 9 Sept 2026, 10:21 | 7,555 | -1 |
| 4 Sept 2026, 03:58 | 7,556 | -10 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 21:28 | 7,566 | -15 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 14:37 | 7,581 | +25 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 21:24 | 7,556 | first reading |
188 posts held, back to 1 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 40 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 13 November 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 188 (1 August 2026 – 13 November 2026) |
| Views total | 381,890 |
| Reactions total | 10,319 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 13 Nov 2026, 15:07 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 13 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Measured directly from 12 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
26,463 reactions across 187 posts, in 9 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 23.7% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| custom 5408930792942378729 | 6,280 | 23.7% | |
| custom 5409369785844671705 | 6,072 | 22.9% | |
| custom 5409237797204697186 | 4,702 | 17.8% | |
| custom 5408917285270232893 | 4,439 | 16.8% | |
| custom 5408909515674393994 | 2,514 | 9.50% | |
| custom 5409060071457989299 | 1,134 | 4.29% | |
| custom 5408997648403308701 | 480 | 1.81% | |
| custom 5447255198441451994 | 435 | 1.64% | |
| custom 5409125904716703580 | 407 | 1.54% |
Custom emoji. Every row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 188 of the 188 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 26,463 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 188 most recent posts we hold, published 1 August 2026 to 13 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 11 of 69 posts held from the last 30 days (15.9%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).
Стрим в ~18:30 где-то подрублю. Будем проходить ваши арбитражи и смотреть аккаунты.
custom 540890951567439399414custom 54472551984414519945custom 54089172852702328933custom 54093697858446717051
Signed Dfg123
Пробники в игре, конечно, прямиком из гайдов Хойолаба
custom 5409237797204697186230custom 540893079294237872936custom 540936978584467170513
Signed Dfg123
Ну что, как у вас впечатления от нового патча? Как мы обсуждали на стриме, разрабу, конечно, чем делать стабильно высококачественный контент, куда выгоднее устраивать нам эмоциональное путешествие из увынска в прайм и обратно, банально потому, что, чтобы сделать человека счастливым, достаточно у него сначала что-то отобрать, а потом вернуть. Так и сейчас, после нескольких патчей полного тухляка нам выкатили по совок…
custom 5408917285270232893142custom 544725519844145199421custom 54092377972046971865
Signed Dfg123
На первой версии беты, Эллен с Астрой показывают весьма потужные результаты, равные е7 Даниле. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_uNPEadG-iM Будут баффать.
custom 540893079294237872950custom 54089095156743939948custom 54089172852702328934
Signed Dfg123
Как вы яхту назовёте, так она и поплывет. С учётом того, что мы вчера на стриме прошли Асата в полнейшем пиве в 11 кост саппорт рейл пачке (е2с0 Блейд, е2с1 Гиацина, е1с0 Сися, е1с0 трибби) влетев два раза птицами на 5 лямов в 1%, то экс-эйдолоны действительно экс. Баффы старичков, итоги.
custom 5408930792942378729130custom 540890951567439399410custom 54092377972046971864custom 54093697858446717053
Signed Dfg123
После сокрушительного разгрома от Говорящего Кота Тома, хитрый Да Вей решил сорвать хотя бы приз зрительских симпатий на Золотом Джойстике, но не тут-то было. Несмотря на играбельного Эона и Царицу, легенды были попущены плодом инцеста между покером и солитером. Это какой-то позор! Ждём эндгейм с косынкой.
custom 5408909515674393994141custom 540893079294237872961custom 544725519844145199410custom 54092377972046971864
Signed Dfg123
Меня спрашивают: а что Астра для Аглаи? Выглядит хорошо для Аглаи. Но есть много нюансов. Самое главное - доп урон Астры. Он прокает в одну цель(скорее всего) или во все? Как Астра вообще взаимодействует с мемоспрайтами и работают ли её баффы нормально. Прокают ли атаки мемоспрайта доп.урон итд. Если всё работает, то уровень усиления урона Астры для Аглаи примерно равен баффам Кирены. Это очень сильно. С Е2 Киреной…
custom 544725519844145199492custom 540891728527023289318custom 54092377972046971863custom 54093697858446717053
Signed Dfg123
Астра Яо по механике очень похожа на старую Зарянку. - Навык и Ульта у неё дают баффы на 3 и 4 хода которые в начале её хода отсчитываются. Навык она автоматом юзает в начале боя, это и бафф сразу же и энергия для быстрой первой Ульты. - За каждую тычку союзников она проводит доп.тычки от своих стат. - У неё Ульт дамажит немного и также у неё есть усиленные базики, но Ульт дорогой, а каждый 4-й ход вы жмёте навык, ч…
custom 540891728527023289395custom 54089095156743939948
Signed Dfg123
Не знаю, как у вас, а у меня проблема с восприятием скиллсетов Хойо. Поэтому попробую перевести их на человеческий язык. Если это норм, то могу хоть каждый раз делать такое или в видосы оформлять. Пишите норм или потуга. Эллен: Дамагер от базиков, который копит стаки “Акульих Кусей” и чем больше накопила, тем больше урон. Имеет саммона “Акулбу”. Имеет именную синергию с Астрой Яо(типа Арчер-Рин итд). Основная механ…
custom 5408930792942378729166custom 540891728527023289369custom 544725519844145199415custom 54089095156743939943
Signed Dfg123
Интересно, Глину за такую ересь тоже по шапке от целевой прилетит?
custom 5408930792942378729129custom 54093697858446717058custom 54089172852702328937
Signed Dfg123
Пока остальные смотрят на Астру и Эллен я смотрю на зеркало 4.8 по сравнению с текущим. Когда думал, что баффнутый Цзинь Юань ещё поиграет хотя бы в Зеркале 😐
custom 5409237797204697186216custom 54093697858446717057custom 54089095156743939944
Signed Dfg123
Кас доделал наконец-то свой потугагайд, могу рекомендовать к просмотру. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1ChW3sG8BHs Также очень советую гайды ХоС-а
custom 540891728527023289370custom 54093697858446717058custom 54472551984414519947
Signed Dfg123
Showing the 12 most recent of 188 posts we hold for @BelialRus. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
We recorded 3 posts on @BelialRus as deleted — posts this register held that were missing from the channel’s public page on two separate reads, taken from different network addresses at least an hour apart.
A deletion is not wrongdoing. This register can see that a post it held is no longer on the channel’s public page, and when — not why. Expired ad placements, reposts, rotating links and corrections all look the same. This is a count of recorded detections, not an exact total: it misses deletions we could not see, because only a post we held and later re-read inside the page can be seen to go, and it may include a small number of wrong records. How this is measured.
The 4 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Скилл в ХСРе -
Shares as published, totalling 99%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Кого бы вы забрали?
Shares as published, totalling 99%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Насколько вам важны комментарии (обсуждение под постами) в этом паблике?
The shares total 109%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Зачем вы играете сюжет?
Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 188 most recent posts we hold, published 1 August 2026 to 13 November 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“BelialHSR” (@BelialRus), 7,799 subscribers as measured 11 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/BelialRus.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.