Fed rate hike odds in September dropped to 44%. Yesterday, it was at 56%. Rate hikes are not coming.
⚡2

Channel
@BeingInvested
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry
2,770subscribers
-10 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
| Telegram ID | -1001464384096 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @BeingInvested |
| Created | 11 February 2020 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 13 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 4 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 13 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/BeingInvested |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 13 Aug 2026, 15:48 | 2,770 | -2 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 16:31 | 2,772 | -9 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 10:28 | 2,781 | +1 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 15:01 | 2,780 | first reading |
28 posts held, back to 4 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 2 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 20 of 28 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 7 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 28 (4 August 2026 – 7 August 2026) |
| Views total | 2,987 |
| Reactions total | 47 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 7 Aug 2026, 16:10 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
47 reactions across 20 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 61.7% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 29 | 61.7% | |
| ⚡ | 7 | 14.9% | |
| 👀 | 4 | 8.51% | |
| 😐 | 3 | 6.38% | |
| 👍 | 2 | 4.26% | |
| 💔 | 2 | 4.26% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 28 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 47reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 28 most recent posts we hold, published 4 August 2026 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Fed rate hike odds in September dropped to 44%. Yesterday, it was at 56%. Rate hikes are not coming.
⚡2
BREAKING: 🇺🇸US economy loses 23,000 jobs in July, lower than expectations. US unemployment rate falls to 4.1%, lower than expectations.
❤1
The liquidity picture is becoming very clear. The largest immediate cluster sits around $65K-$65.5K above. Below us, the main liquidity sits around $63.4K-$64K. With Bitcoin currently holding above $64.2K, Favours the upper cluster being swept first. Lose $64.2K and that view changes.
❤4
A whale just bought $27,960,000 worth of $BTC on Binance
⚡1❤1
🚀 New campaign is live on TxFlow: Trader Royale 2.0 How it works: - Up to $3,000 per person in Fee Credits - Ranked by cumulative futures taker volume from when you join - Positions held 1 min+, manual trading only - Pool unlocks at $20M combined volume ($1,000 base), +$200 per extra $5M - Rewards paid in Fee Credits (offset trading fees, valid 14 days) https://app.txflow.com/campaign/trader-royale-2/?referral_code…
Photo, posted without a caption
Senate delays Crypto Clarity Act vote until after summer (mid sep) recess.
💔2
I came across a trading tool that somehow still hasn’t caught much attention: @Boole_AI. Been testing it myself and there’s a LOT you can do with AI agents here. 🔗 https://trade.boole.markets/?ref=711Y70G3 » Market-making strategies » Delta-neutral setups » Grid trading » Cross-pair / arbitrage strategies » Build + backtest custom strategies » Automate execution & position management » Trade across Hyperliquid, Ph…
$BTC has bottomed ? The pattern aligns with the 2022 bottom: - Deep negative net capital flows (Glassnode realized-cap style) at the price low, then recovery. - Current outflows during the drawdown from $126k create a similar divergence. - Multiple on-chain metrics sit in prior-cycle bottom zones, so the signal is coherent, though the single historical instance and ETF-driven market structure limit certainty. BTC …
Ansem: Signs of Bottom Being In > Price stops going down on bad news (saylor selling millions into 58-60k & $BTC printing higher lows) > Crypto native mobile apps starting to pickup real traction (pumpfun revenue up 20% week-over-week) > Institutional interest coming back (robinhood chain, PTJ publicly bullish BTC) > Interest across social media trending again Source: https://x.com/blknoiz06/status/2084873954095…
minted 5 fuego nfts today 🕯️ after digging deeper, i think a lot of people are still missing what fuego actually is. it’s not just an nft. → seasonal trading competitions on lighter → delegate your nft to traders if you don’t trade yourself → nft vaults designed to accumulate rewards → ecosystem rewards as lighter and lighterevm continue to grow → only 5,555 supply if you’re planning to mint, use only the officia…
❤2
Do You Think Crypto Act Will Be Passed?
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Showing the 12 most recent of 28 posts we hold for @BeingInvested. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
The 2 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Do You Think Crypto Act Will Be Passed?
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
WHAT IS $BTC NEXT MOVE?
Shares as published, totalling 99%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 28 most recent posts we hold, published 4 August 2026 to 7 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Citation-graph rank — 407,928 of 1,350,102entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“ivish | ₿eing Invested” (@BeingInvested), 2,770 subscribers as measured 13 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/BeingInvested.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.