🛑 توضیحات درمان نابینایی توسط ایلان ماسک 🔻 به کانال #تلگرامی اخبار بهزیستی معلولین #بپیوندید 🟠 @BehzistiMalolinNews
❤26👍8👌2💔2🙏2💯1

Channel
@BehzistiMalolinNews
On this record: Topic · Observations · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
25,033subscribers
+91 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.
| Telegram ID | -1001314816370 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @BehzistiMalolinNews |
| Description | ✅ درج اخبار به روز و #موثق بهزیستی،مستمری،بسته معیشتی، سبد کالا، سهام عدالت، اشتغال، وام ،جشن ، همایش ، مناسب سازی، زنان سرپرست خانوار، مسکن و... 🔻 ارسال سوژه ها و کلیپ ها از معلولان @CILVERMAN_2018 🟠 #سایت سازمان بهزیستی کشور http://Behzisti.ir |
| Created | Between 1 March 2018 and 31 July 2021— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 18 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 13 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 18 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/BehzistiMalolinNews |
Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 42% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.
19,300 average views per post against 25,028 subscribers — an engagement rate of 77.1%. Across the 8,067 registered channels in the same cohort — 10,000–31,621 subscribers, posting mainly in Persian — the middle half sit between 3.68% and 17.3%, with a median of 8.65%.
| Window | 30 days (19 July 2026 – 18 August 2026) |
|---|---|
| Posts measured | 10 of 10 published in the window (0 exact, 10 rounded by Telegram) |
| Views totalled | 192,850 |
| Mature posts only | 84.7% over 9 posts read at least 24h after publication |
| Subscribers | 25,028 measured 17 August 2026 |
| Cohort | b10000:fas · 8,067 channels · p10 1.56% · p25 3.68% · p50 8.65% · p75 17.3% · p90 29.5% |
| Position in cohort | 99.008th percentile · 8.9× the cohort median |
| Uncertainty | ±0.123% of the figure, from Telegram’s rounding |
| Post language | Persian · 100.0%of the window’s posts |
When this is recorded. A channel is listed here only when its engagement rate sits at or above the 99th percentile of its cohort and is at least 3× away from that cohort’s median — above it — on both the all-readings figure and the mature-only figure. The percentile alone would be circular: a percentile cut puts the same share of every cohort in the tail whatever the data looks like. The distance from the median is what makes it a statement about this channel.
This is not a verdict, and the direction is not a quality signal.A low rate has many innocent causes — audiences that read in the Telegram app without opening the channel, a subscriber base built long before the current output, an audience in a different timezone from our reading. A high rate has innocent causes too: a post that travelled far beyond the channel’s own subscribers will do it. We publish the measurement and the distribution it sits in. The full cohort baselines are downloadable, so this comparison can be reproduced rather than trusted.
Recorded under the key err_high, last confirmed 18 August 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 18 Aug 2026, 17:52 | 25,033 | +5 |
| 17 Aug 2026, 15:55 | 25,028 | -4 |
| 16 Aug 2026, 07:54 | 25,032 | +12 |
| 14 Aug 2026, 17:48 | 25,020 | -3 |
| 13 Aug 2026, 07:35 | 25,023 | +13 |
| 12 Aug 2026, 04:54 | 25,010 | +44 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 03:53 | 24,966 | +7 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 02:32 | 24,959 | +11 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 00:54 | 24,948 | -4 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 21:25 | 24,952 | +6 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 22:35 | 24,946 | +4 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 17:15 | 24,942 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 17:04 | 24,942 | first reading |
24 posts held, back to 12 June 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 28 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 18 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 24 (12 June 2026 – 18 August 2026) |
| Views total | 201,200 |
| Reactions total | 1,968 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 19 Aug 2026, 03:43 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 19 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Measured directly from 4 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
4,825 reactions across 24 posts, in 19 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 32.9% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 1,587 | 32.9% | |
| 🤬 | 1,070 | 22.2% | |
| 👍 | 913 | 18.9% | |
| 👎 | 492 | 10.2% | |
| 🙏 | 324 | 6.72% | |
| 👏 | 160 | 3.32% | |
| 😭 | 94 | 1.95% | |
| 😢 | 46 | 0.953% | |
| 🤔 | 26 | 0.539% | |
| 💔 | 24 | 0.497% | |
| 🥰 | 18 | 0.373% | |
| 💯 | 14 | 0.29% | |
| 😱 | 12 | 0.249% | |
| 🔥 | 10 | 0.207% | |
| 😐 | 10 | 0.207% | |
| 🤩 | 10 | 0.207% | |
| 👌 | 9 | 0.187% | |
| 🤨 | 4 | 0.083% | |
| 🏆 | 2 | 0.041% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 24 of the 24 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 4,825reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 24 most recent posts we hold, published 12 June 2026 to 18 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
🛑 توضیحات درمان نابینایی توسط ایلان ماسک 🔻 به کانال #تلگرامی اخبار بهزیستی معلولین #بپیوندید 🟠 @BehzistiMalolinNews
❤26👍8👌2💔2🙏2💯1
🛑 شرکت Neuralink ایلان ماسک قابلیت جدیدی رو به چیپ مغزیش اضافه کرده که به افراد دارای معلولیت حرکتی اجازه میده فقط با استفاده از سیگنال های مغزشون، ویلچر برقی رو کنترل و هدایت کنن. 🔻 این یعنی بدون استفاده از دست یا هر وسیله کنترلی، فقط با فکر کردن میشه ویلچر رو به حرکت درآورد؛ قدمی مهم برای افزایش استقلال افراد دارای محدودیت حرکتی. 🔻 به کانال #تلگرامی اخبار بهزیستی معلولین #بپیوندید 🟠 @BehzistiMalolinNews
❤78👏41🙏8👍6👌5👎4💯2
🔴 ۱۵۲۰۰۰ معلول پشت نوبتِ دریافت حقپرستاری 🔸 معاون توانبخشی سازمان بهزیستی در گفتوگو با ایسنا: ۱۵۲ هزار و ۷۲۳ نفر درخواست خود را برای دریافت حق پرستاری ثبت کردهاند که پشت نوبت هستند. 🔻 در صورت تامین و تخصیص بودجه در اسرع وقت افراد پشت نوبت از حق پرستاری بهرهمند خواهند شد. 🔻 علت پشت نوبت بودن افراد واجد شرایط کمبود اعتبار است. 🔻 به کانال #تلگرامی اخبار بهزیستی معلولین #بپیوندید 🟠 @BehzistiMalolinNews
🤬143😢30❤17👍14👏7👎5😐5🤩3
✅ #مستمری مرداد ماه 1405 #مددجویان تحت پوشش #سازمان_بهزیستی به #حساب_کارت بانک رفاه این عزیزان #واریز گردید 💵 1نفره: 2/100/000 تومان 💵 2نفره: 2/985/000 تومان 💵 3نفره: 4/200/000 تومان 💵 4نفره: 5/370/000 تومان 💵 5نفره: 6/570/000 تومان #سازمان_بهزیستی_کشور 🔻 به کانال #تلگرامی اخبار بهزیستی معلولین #بپیوندید 🟠 @BehzistiMalolinNews
❤131👎68🤬29👍22🙏22😭4👏2💯2
🛑 درمان نابینایی توسط ایلان ماسک تا یک سال دیگر 🔻 به کانال #تلگرامی اخبار بهزیستی معلولین #بپیوندید 🟠 @BehzistiMalolinNews
❤145👏48😭12👎9🤔8🙏7👍5🥰4
🔴 تأیید ایمنی بلندمدت درمان ضایعات نخاعی با سلولهای بنیادی iPS در ژاپن 🔬 پژوهشگران دانشگاه کیو (Keio University) ژاپن اعلام کردند که نتایج پیگیری بلندمدت نخستین مطالعه بالینی جهان درباره پیوند سلولهای پیشساز عصبی مشتق از سلولهای بنیادی پرتوان القایی (iPS) نشان میدهد که این روش از نظر ایمنی، نتایج امیدوارکنندهای داشته است. 🧫 در این مطالعه، بین سالهای ۲۰۲۰ تا ۲۰۲۵، به چهار بیمار مبتلا به ضایعات نخاعی در مرحله…
❤107👏22👍12😭7🙏7💯3
✅ کمک معیشت تیر ماه 1405 بند (پ) تبصره (12) معلولان شدید و خیلی شدید تحت پوشش سازمان بهزیستی به حساب کارت بانک رفاه در حال واریز است 💵 مبلغ: 2/000/000 تومان #سازمان_بهزیستی_کشور 🔻 به کانال #تلگرامی اخبار بهزیستی معلولین #بپیوندید 🟠 @BehzistiMalolinNews
🤬117❤100👍19😭16🙏13👎10😱5🤔4
✅ حق پرستاری خانواده محور تیرماه 1405 معلولان جسمی حرکتی شدید و خیلی شدید و معلولان ذهنی تحت پوشش سازمان بهزیستی با اعمال افزایش به حساب کارت بانک رفاه واریز گردید 💵 مبلغ:7/560/000 تومان #سازمان_بهزیستی_کشور 🔻 به کانال #تلگرامی اخبار بهزیستی معلولین #بپیوندید 🟠 @BehzistiMalolinNews
❤91🤬65🙏21👍20👎15😭8👏3
✅ حق پرستاری تیر ماه 1405 معلولان ضایعه نخاعی تحت پوشش سازمان بهزیستی با اعمال افزایش به حساب کارت بانک رفاه واریز گردید 💵 مبلغ:8/000/000 تومان #سازمان_بهزیستی_کشور 🔻 به کانال #تلگرامی اخبار بهزیستی معلولین #بپیوندید 🟠 @BehzistiMalolinNews
👍79🤬53❤25🙏13👎6🥰4🔥2😭2
🛑 آزمون استخدامی ویژه معلولین در آبان ماه 1405 🔸 مدیرکل بهزیستی استان تهران از برگزاری آزمون استخدامی ویژه افراد دارای معلولیت در آبان ماه 1405 خبر داد و گفت: با تجمیع سهمیه سه درصدی استخدام دستگاههای اجرایی، سه هزار و 500 فرصت شغلی در 45 دستگاه دولتی برای جامعه هدف بهزیستی فراهم شده است. 🔻 به کانال #تلگرامی اخبار بهزیستی معلولین #بپیوندید 🟠 @BehzistiMalolinNews
👍61👎38❤37🤬16👏8🙏5💯4😭3
🔴 افزایش کمک هزینه بهداشتی معلولان براساس شدت معلولیت 🔸 معاون توانبخشی سازمان بهزیستی کشور از افزایش کمک هزینه بهداشتی معلولان براساس شدت معلولیت خبر داد و گفت: با هدف ارتقای عدالت در تخصیص منابع، این کمک هزینه از یک میلیون و ۵۰۰ هزار تومان با توجه به شدت معلولیت تا ۳ میلیون تومان افزایش یافته است. 👤 فاطمه عباسی روز چهارشنبه در گفت و گو با خبرنگار ایرنا افزود: سازمان بهزیستی کشور، اجرای نظام پرداخت مبتنی بر نیاز در…
👍132❤65🙏31🤬28👎16😭7😱3🔥1
✅ مابهالتفاوت حق پرستاری 3 ماهه فروردین، اردیبهشت و خرداد ماه 1405 معلولان خانواده محور تحت پوشش سازمان بهزیستی به حساب کارت بانک رفاه واریزدر حال واریز است مبلغ فروردین: 3/360/000 تومان مبلغ اردیبهشت: 3/360/000 تومان مبلغ خرداد: 3/360/000 تومان #سازمان_بهزیستی_کشور 🔻 به کانال #تلگرامی اخبار بهزیستی معلولین #بپیوندید 🟠 @BehzistiMalolinNews
❤112🤬41👎32🙏29👍20💔3😭3😱2
Showing the 12 most recent of 24 posts we hold for @BehzistiMalolinNews. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 460,530 of 1,550,220entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 18 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“اخبار بهزیستی معلولین” (@BehzistiMalolinNews), 25,033 subscribers as measured 18 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/BehzistiMalolinNews.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.