Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

Behind The Scanner Chinese

@BehindTheScannerChinese

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

1,357subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001124257640
TypeChannel
Username@BehindTheScannerChinese
DescriptionIngress - BTSC 团队(中文)
CreatedBetween 1 June 2017 and 31 July 2020— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live12 August 2026
Measurements held2
On Telegramt.me/BehindTheScannerChinese

Growth

1,3576 Aug 2026, 08:57 — 1,357 subscribers6 Aug 2026, 09:04 — 1,357 subscribers6 Aug 2026, 08:576 Aug 2026, 09:04
2 measurements taken within a single day. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 1,356–1,358 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
6 Aug 2026, 09:041,357no change
6 Aug 2026, 08:571,357first reading

Engagement

19 posts held, back to 23 March 2024the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 19 posts for this entry, the most recent from 6 April 2024. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Recent posts

6 Apr 2024, 04:54 UTC≈5,100 views1 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Forwarded from @IngressChinese

#BuriedMemories 詳情及規則請見: https://ingress.com/news/2024-buriedmem

5 Apr 2024, 18:23 UTC≈5,270 viewsread 6 August 2026
Photo

2024年04月 IngressFS 中文區活動場次-地面,2024年04月06日 https://cluelessness.net/ifs/events/

5 Apr 2024, 05:33 UTC≈4,790 viewsread 6 August 2026

為令參與 IngressFS 的玩家們能順利報名,我們提供以下網頁作為暫時使用。 https://cluelessness.net/ifs/events/ 不便之處,敬請原諒 IFS-UN

5 Apr 2024, 04:53 UTC≈3,900 views1 reactionsread 6 August 2026

收到一些反映關於目前 IngressFS 相關網頁打不開,據我們對於目前的了解,Fevgames 的網站包括 IngressFS 在2個星期前開始進行整修工程,目前遇到一些問題正在處理當中。 IFS-UN

4 Apr 2024, 04:23 UTC≈3,450 views7 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Forwarded from @IngressChinesePhoto

從現在起,APEX可以回收成XM或合成為第8級共振器。 #Ingress #APEXRedefine

3 Apr 2024, 01:03 UTC≈3,190 views16 reactionsread 6 August 2026

注意安全⚠️ 台灣·花蓮 7.2級地震 受地震影響,在台灣 Agent 出行時請注意安全,出行享受 Ingress 時也請注意周圍環境可能會因地震而造成了危險,安全玩樂最重要🙏。 • 台灣·金門發出海嘯警報 • 日本·沖縄及宮古島・八重山發出海嘯警告 • 菲律賓發出海嘯警報

2 Apr 2024, 17:05 UTC≈2,520 views38 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Forwarded from @NianticOfficial

wu578mx56apea

1 Apr 2024, 03:16 UTC≈2,880 views75 reactionsread 6 August 2026

由於您長時間未打開 Ingress,已被移出此頻道! You have been removed from this channel due to a long period of time without open Ingress! 今天有效,only valid for today 點擊🤡解除限制 Click 🤡 to remove restrictions 祝您愚人節快樂! Happy April Fool's Day!

1 Apr 2024, 03:10 UTC≈2,300 viewsread 6 August 2026
Forwarded from @NianticOfficialPhoto

Photo, posted without a caption

Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @BehindTheScannerChinese. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 701,246 of 1,350,102entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 6 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Behind The Scanner Chinese” (@BehindTheScannerChinese), 1,357 subscribers as measured 6 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/BehindTheScannerChinese.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.