Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for در گذرِ كتاب

Channel

در گذرِ كتاب

@Beheshteketab

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

8,641subscribers

+39 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001079292145
TypeChannel
Username@Beheshteketab
CreatedBetween 1 September 2016 and 30 September 2017 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded24 August 2026
Last confirmed live3 September 2026
Measurements held12
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 3 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/Beheshteketab

Growth

8,6028,6468,6246 August 2026 — 8,602 subscribers7 August 2026 — 8,606 subscribers10 August 2026 — 8,608 subscribers13 August 2026 — 8,612 subscribers16 August 2026 — 8,616 subscribers19 August 2026 — 8,615 subscribers22 August 2026 — 8,619 subscribers24 August 2026 — 8,619 subscribers25 August 2026 — 8,625 subscribers28 August 2026 — 8,646 subscribers31 August 2026 — 8,640 subscribers3 September 2026 — 8,641 subscribers8,6416 August 20263 September 2026
12 measurements spanning 29 days, net +39. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 8,595–8,653 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
3 Sept 2026, 19:418,641+1
31 Aug 2026, 15:058,640-6
28 Aug 2026, 15:538,646+21
25 Aug 2026, 13:238,625+6
24 Aug 2026, 20:418,619no change
22 Aug 2026, 17:088,619+4
19 Aug 2026, 03:458,615-1
16 Aug 2026, 07:228,616+4
13 Aug 2026, 00:338,612+4
10 Aug 2026, 00:418,608+2
7 Aug 2026, 01:428,606+4
6 Aug 2026, 06:468,602first reading

Engagement

31 posts held, back to 20 August 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 6 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
7.00%
avg views ÷ 8,641 subscribers
Avg views / post
605
31 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.864%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
31
of 31 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 28 of 31 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 28 August 2026
Posts held31 (20 August 202628 August 2026)
Views total18,755
Reactions total147
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken28 Aug 2026, 16:46 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

147 reactions across 28 posts, in 2 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 95.2% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👍14095.2%
👎74.76%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 28 of the 31 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 147 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 31 most recent posts we hold, published 20 August 2026 to 28 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

28 Aug 2026, 15:08 UTC105 views2 reactionsread 28 August 2026

یک فرد فقط به درجه‌ای که می‌فهمد، آزاد است، و “فهم”، مستلزم درکِ ضرورتِ چیزها است. و ضرورت چیزها را نمی‌توانیم با کمک “کلیّات” بفهمیم؛ بلکه، ضرورتِ چیزها را فقط از طریق خاص بودن‌شان می‌فهمیم. آزادی راستین، برنت ادکینز @Beheshteketab

👍2

27 Aug 2026, 13:41 UTC387 views5 reactionsread 28 August 2026

اگر دوست داشتید برای شادی روح شادروان مارگارت هفرنان کتابِ کوری خودخواسته را با صدای بلند مطالعه کنید.

👍5

27 Aug 2026, 12:03 UTC445 views5 reactionsread 28 August 2026

اگر امروز تصمیم نگیریم که ببینیم، فردا تاریخ ما را نه تماشاگر، بلکه شریکِ خاموش سرکوب و جنایت خواهد نوشت.

👍5

27 Aug 2026, 12:02 UTC447 views2 reactionsread 28 August 2026

کوری در این رمان حکایت از غفلت، نادانی و بی‌خبری از خود واقعی و ضمیر آگاه آدمیان و جامعه است که در اینجا می توان به مفهوم دلزدگیی و بی اعتنایی مدنی نیز در پیوند با آن اشاره کرد، این مفهوم به این معناست که آدمیان علی رغم زندگی در کنار یکدیگر نسبت به هم و همچنین نسبت به جامعه‌ی خود غافل و بی‌اعتنا هستند و به جای زندگی اجتماعی صرفاً زیست جمعی در کنار یکدیگر را تجربه می‌کنند که این مفهوم در این رمان به شکل سمبلیک و به صو

👍2

27 Aug 2026, 11:51 UTC382 views2 reactionsread 28 August 2026

زندگی تمام کسانی که گرفتار به ظلم خودخواهانه می شوند، اما همچنان سکوت می‌کنند و ادامه می دهند.

👍2

27 Aug 2026, 11:33 UTC460 views4 reactionsread 28 August 2026

کوری خودخواسته؛ شریک خاموش جنایت مارگارت هفرنان در کتاب کوری خودخواسته(Willful Blindness) توضیح می‌دهد که بسیاری از فجایع نه از نادانی، بلکه از انتخاب آگاهانه‌ی ندیدن پدید می‌آیند. انسان‌ها برای حفظ آرامش، امنیت یا منافع خود، چشم بر حقیقت می‌بندند. اما همین چشم بستن، همان سکوتی است که جنایت را ممکن می‌سازد. ما ایرانیان این حقیقت تلخ را بارها تجربه کرده‌ایم؛ از دهه‌ی ۶۰ تا آبان ۹۸، و به‌ویژه در سال ۱۴۰۱و ١۴٠۴. زمانی

👍4

27 Aug 2026, 11:25 UTC332 views2 reactionsread 28 August 2026

«کوری خودخواسته: چرا ما از روی اختیار خود را در تاریکی نگاه می‌داریم؟» کتابی بسیار خواندنی است که در ۲۰۱۴ جزو فینالیست‌های جایزه بهترین کتاب اقتصادی دنیا قرار گرفت و روزنامه «فایننشیال تایمز» در همان سال آن را بهترین کتاب انگیزشی سال معرفی کرد. هفرنان در بخشی از کتاب می‌نویسد: «چه به صورت فردی، چه به صورت جمعی، کوری خودخواسته تنها یک محرک ندارد، بلکه محرک های بسیار در کارند. این پدیده، پدیده‌ای انسانی است که ما همه

👍2

27 Aug 2026, 11:23 UTC335 views5 reactionsread 28 August 2026

قانون اهمیتی نمی‌دهد که چرا شما ناآگاه باقی ماندید، اما من به این موضوع علاقه‌مندم که چرا ما از روی انتخاب، خود را در تاریکی نگاه می‌داریم؟ چرا بعد از هر شکست یا فاجعه‌ای، صداهایی بلند می‌شود که می‌گویند خطر را دیده‌ بودند و درباره‌ی آن هشدار داده بودند. کوری خودخواسته @Beheshteketab

👍5

27 Aug 2026, 11:21 UTC406 views4 reactionsread 28 August 2026
Photo

"کوری خودخواسته" نوشته‌ی مارگارت هفرنان نویسنده‌ی کتاب موشکافانه به بررسی پدیده‌ی انکار پرداخته و نقش این پدیده را در گرفتاری‌های بزرگ تاریخ معاصر نشان داده است. خانم هفرنان ابتدا گستردگی پدیده‌ی انکار را در زندگی‌های شخصی ما نشان داده و سپس نقش آن را در حوادثی همچون فاجعه‌ی نیروگاه اتمی چرنوبیل, بحران وال استریت و فجایع زندان‌هایی همچون ابوغریب اثبات می‌نماید. @Beheshteketab

👍4

27 Aug 2026, 06:11 UTC390 views1 reactionsread 28 August 2026
File

داستان اینجه ممد نوشته: یاشار کمال (نویسنده کُرد اهل ترکیه) ترجمه: ثمین باغچه‌بان قسمت بیست و هفتم صدا و اجرای: حسین لی @Beheshteketab

👍1

26 Aug 2026, 15:07 UTC536 views12 reactionsread 28 August 2026

‏در مجموع می‌توان گفت که ملت ایران شبیه به آن بوته‌های صحرائی چون قیچ و گز بوده‌ است که زندگی در شدائد را می‌آموزند و ریشه‌ی خود را محکم می‌کنند و با کم‌آبی و سموم و داغی و سردی خو می‌گیرند و چون بادهای تند بوزد و یا شن‌های انبوه روی آورد سر خود را خٓم می‌کنند و از نو پس از رفع خطر، برمی‌افرازند و عادت کرده‌اند که ذخیره‌ی حیاتی در خود داشته باشند که در خشکسالی و عسرت آن را به کار گیرند. دکتراسلامی نُدوشن @Beheshteke

👍12

25 Aug 2026, 23:55 UTC562 views2 reactionsread 28 August 2026
File

صوتی سم زدایی دوپامین راهکاری برای حفظ تمرکز در دنیای وسوسه‌انگیز مدرن. تیبو موریس در کتاب سم زدایی دوپامین به شما کمک می‌کند حواس‌پرتی‌ها را به حداقل برسانید و با قدرت بر اهدافتان متمرکز بمانید. این اثر می‌تواند نقطه‌ای سرنوشت‌ساز در زندگی‌تان باشد. سم زدایی دوپامین تیبو موریس @Beheshteketab

👍2

Showing the 12 most recent of 31 posts we hold for @Beheshteketab. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Mentions

Named by 6 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

برترین کتابها
@bartarinbookk · 32,485
Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 5 September 2026
روشنفکران
@Roshanfkrane · 57,686
Telegram ranks this channel #30 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 24 August 2026
کتابخانه
@bookhapdf · 75,585
Telegram ranks this channel #32 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 19 August 2026
📚 کتابخانه نایاب عرفانی نور 📚
@book_noor · 43,784
Telegram ranks this channel #40 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 28 August 2026
| فروغ_ شاملو |
@foroogh_shamloo · 51,961
Telegram ranks this channel #42 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 24 August 2026
📖📚 شیفتگان کتــــــاب 📚📖
@shifteganketab · 83,841
Telegram ranks this channel #48 of 70 here — alongside 69 others — read 18 August 2026
مهاجرت با فرناز فیاض بخش
@FarnazFayazbakhsh · 44,674
Telegram ranks this channel #52 of 60 here — alongside 59 others — read 28 August 2026
کتابهای ممنوعه
@ketab_mamnouee · 78,394
Telegram ranks this channel #64 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 19 August 2026
دانلود کتاب 📚
@dl_ketab · 60,127
Telegram ranks this channel #67 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 22 August 2026
مصطفی ملکیان
@mostafamalekian · 65,707
Telegram ranks this channel #69 of 99 here — alongside 98 others — read 21 August 2026
کتابخانه تلگرامی
@mylibraries · 74,447
Telegram ranks this channel #77 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 19 August 2026
عرفان و خودشناسی
@Khodshenasivo · 42,555
Telegram ranks this channel #86 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 29 August 2026
دلنوشته ها - رحیم قمیشی
@ghomeishi3 · 33,935
Telegram ranks this channel #87 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 3 September 2026
تحلیل و رصد
@tahlilvarasad · 70,533
Telegram ranks this channel #93 of 99 here — alongside 98 others — read 20 August 2026

This channel appears in 14 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 3 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“در گذرِ كتاب” (@Beheshteketab), 8,641 subscribers as measured 3 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Beheshteketab.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.