24 measurements spanning 24 days, net +291. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 20,448–21,827 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 24
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
31 Aug 2026, 14:53
21,447
-99
30 Aug 2026, 14:25
21,546
-13
29 Aug 2026, 14:27
21,559
-65
28 Aug 2026, 16:23
21,624
-44
27 Aug 2026, 14:12
21,668
+107
26 Aug 2026, 16:22
21,561
-10
25 Aug 2026, 15:53
21,571
+23
24 Aug 2026, 13:08
21,548
+138
22 Aug 2026, 19:08
21,410
+204
21 Aug 2026, 09:14
21,206
+458
20 Aug 2026, 08:27
20,748
+141
19 Aug 2026, 11:15
20,607
-58
18 Aug 2026, 12:33
20,665
-50
17 Aug 2026, 14:34
20,715
-122
16 Aug 2026, 04:59
20,837
-58
14 Aug 2026, 14:26
20,895
-58
13 Aug 2026, 07:24
20,953
-29
12 Aug 2026, 08:44
20,982
-30
11 Aug 2026, 07:59
21,012
-41
10 Aug 2026, 10:11
21,053
first reading
Engagement
177 posts held, back to 7 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 52 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
8.17%
avg views ÷ 21,447 subscribers
Avg views / post
1,750
159 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.333%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
159
of 177 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 151 of 159 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 31 August 2026
Posts held
177 (7 July 2026 – 31 August 2026)
Views total
278,444
Reactions total
884
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
31 Aug 2026, 23:12 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
196
Videos
48
Links
831
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 31 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Video runtime
9s
Average length
9s
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
2,328 reactions across 168 posts, in 27 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 31.6% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
736
31.6%
👍
456
19.6%
🤣
373
16.0%
💔
302
13.0%
🔥
165
7.09%
👎
117
5.03%
🤷
52
2.23%
😡
29
1.25%
🎉
15
0.644%
🗿
15
0.644%
❤🔥
13
0.558%
🙉
8
0.344%
😨
7
0.301%
🤪
7
0.301%
💅
6
0.258%
💘
5
0.215%
🎅
4
0.172%
🤷♀
4
0.172%
🆒
2
0.086%
🌚
2
0.086%
7 further kinds
10
0.43%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 169 of the 177 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 2,328 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 177 most recent posts we hold, published 7 July 2026 to 31 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
📰 خلاصه اخبار مهم
🔴 تنشهای نظامی آمریکا و ایران
به گفته مقامهای آمریکایی، سنتکام نگران تلاش ایران برای بازسازی رادارها، پدافند هوایی و موشکهای ضدکشتی در اطراف تنگه هرمز است. یکی از موارد نگرانکننده، شلیک یک موشک ضدهوایی ایران به سمت یک جنگنده F-35 آمریکایی بوده است.
ترامپ درباره ایران: آنها یک کشور شکستخورده هستند. نرخ تورم آنها به ۳۵۰ درصد رسیده است. آنها هیچ ارز معتبری ندارند. به سربازان خود حقوق نمیدهند. بیش…
📰 خلاصه اخبار مهم
🔴 تحرکات نظامی و اظهارات فرماندهان سپاه
• العربیه به نقل از منابع یمنی گزارش داد ایران در ماههای ژوئن و ژوئیه حدود ۷۵ کارشناس نظامی از جمله اعضای سپاه به مناطق تحت کنترل حوثیها در یمن اعزام کرده است. این افراد برای تقویت توان دریایی، موشکی و پهپادی حوثیها و بهبود سامانههای فرماندهی و مقابله با نظارت در دریای سرخ و تنگه بابالمندب اعزام شدهاند. آخرین گروه ۲۵ نفره در ۱۳ ژوئیه با پرواز ماهان وارد …
📰 خلاصه اخبار مهم
🔴 اظهارات ترامپ درباره ایران
• ترامپ در شبکه تروث ایران را «کشور شکستخورده» خواند و گفت ایران نیروی دریایی، نیروی هوایی، پول و ارز ندارد، حقوق سربازان و پلیس خود را پرداخت نمیکند و تورم به ۳۰۰ درصد رسیده است. او رهبری ایران را «دچار آشفتگی و سردرگمی» توصیف کرد و مدعی شد بیش از ۱۰۰ هزار نفر کشته شدهاند و باید به دلیل جنایات جنگی محاکمه شوند.
• طبق اعلام ترامپ، حمله آمریکا به خط ساحلی جنوب ایران بر…
📰 خلاصه اخبار مهم
🔴 اظهارنظرهای مقامات درباره جنگ ایران و آمریکا
• عراقچی، وزیر خارجه، مدعی شد نتانیاهو در صحبتهای عبریزبانش با افتخار میگوید موفق شده دولت آمریکا را متقاعد کند به جای اسرائیل، علیه ایران وارد جنگ شود. به گفته عراقچی، نتانیاهو با خنده از تأثیر بیش از ۱۰۰۰ ساعت حضور رسانهای در شبکههای تلویزیونی آمریکا بر افکار و سیاست آن کشور صحبت کرده، اما در صحبتهای انگلیسیزبانش از رهبری ترامپ تمجید میکند.
• …
📰 خلاصه اخبار مهم
🔴 تنگه هرمز
• سپاه پاسداران اعلام کرد یک نفتکش غولپیکر ناسازگار که قصد عبور غیرقانونی از مسیر جنوبی تنگه هرمز را داشت، با دو مین دریایی برخورد کرده و پس از آتشسوزی گسترده متوقف شد. سپاه هشدار داد شناورهای دیگری که قواعد امنیتی آن را نقض کنند با همین سرنوشت مواجه خواهند شد.
• سنتکام اعلام کرد نیروهای آمریکایی اقدامات محدود و دقیقی علیه نیروهای سپاه پاسداران که در حال نصب مین در تنگه هرمز بودند و ته…
📰 خلاصه اخبار مهم
🔴 حمله متقابل ایران به پایگاههای هوایی اردن
• سپاه پاسداران اعلام کرد با موشکهای بالستیک و پهپاد، تأسیسات فنی و محل استقرار جنگندهها در پایگاههای هوایی «ملک حسین» و «الازرق» اردن را هدف قرار داده و خسارت سنگینی به این پایگاهها وارد کرده است. این حمله در پاسخ به حمله آمریکا به جزیره لارک ایران انجام شده و سپاه هشدار داده در صورت ادامه حملات، پاسخهای شدیدتری در راه خواهد بود.
🔴 تحرکات نظامی در …
📰 خلاصه اخبار مهم
🔴 حمله موشکی و رهگیری
• سامانه پدافندی پاتریوت سه موشک بالستیک سپاه پاسداران را برفراز اردن رهگیری و منهدم کرد. یک مقام ارشد آمریکایی در گفتوگو با فاکس نیوز تأیید کرد که تمام موشکهای شلیکشده رهگیری شدهاند.
🔴 اخبار نظامی
• دقایقی پیش صدای انفجاری در کرمانشاه شنیده شد که احتمالاً مربوط به پرتاب موشک بوده است.
• دو موشک بالستیک سپاه پاسداران توسط سامانه پدافندی پاتریوت برفراز اردن رهگیری و منهدم ش…
🔥5🎅2❤1
Showing the 12 most recent of 177 posts we hold for @BeOfoq. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Posts edited after publishing
@BeOfoq edited 7 posts after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
First edit seen
21 August 2026
Most recent edit
30 August 2026
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 386,601 of 1,629,518 entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 31 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“BeOfoq | به افق” (@BeOfoq), 21,447 subscribers as measured 31 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/BeOfoq.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.