Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for BazZ reviews

Channel

BazZ reviews

@BazZReviews

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

31subscribers

-1 since we began measuring on 11 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002410486592
TypeChannel
Username@BazZReviews
CreatedBetween 1 September 2024 and 31 March 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded11 August 2026
Last confirmed live24 August 2026
Measurements held3
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 24 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/BazZReviews

Growth

313231.511 August 2026 — 32 subscribers11 August 2026 — 32 subscribers24 August 2026 — 31 subscribers11 August 202624 August 2026
3 measurements spanning 14 days, net -1. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 31–32 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
24 Aug 2026, 21:5431-1
11 Aug 2026, 02:3032no change
11 Aug 2026, 02:1732first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 17 June 2025the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 11 January 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Recent posts

11 Jan 2026, 18:58 UTC32 viewsread 11 August 2026

@BazZgg сделал всё чётко, лучший тип в тг которого знаю

11 Jan 2026, 18:58 UTC32 viewsread 11 August 2026

@BazZgg купил тгк все прошло отлично спасибо ему и @Lok1_x нету никакого скама

3 Oct 2025, 15:47 UTC81 viewsread 11 August 2026

@BazZgg очень хорошо справился с задачей Гаранта на нашей сделке, без скама, всё быстро и чётко провёл. Респект

22 Aug 2025, 18:50 UTC215 viewsread 11 August 2026

@BazZgg отдал вывод с рся все быстро и с кайфом

2 Aug 2025, 12:49 UTC222 viewsread 11 August 2026

@BazZgg сделал пиар на 200 человек не скам покупайте

30 Jul 2025, 11:35 UTC219 viewsread 11 August 2026

@BazZgg, спасибо что купил скин, не скам👍🏼

27 Jul 2025, 12:51 UTC219 viewsread 11 August 2026

@BazZgg Леф,без наебалова дал канал,+РЕП

22 Jul 2025, 11:41 UTC218 viewsread 11 August 2026

Все четко @BazZgg все выдал как надо было , спасибо огромное тебе 🍉

22 Jul 2025, 09:49 UTC195 viewsread 11 August 2026

@BazZgg сделал 215 прихода, всё с кайфом советую

21 Jul 2025, 22:28 UTC172 viewsread 11 August 2026

@BazZgg сделал 200+ прихода, не скам советую

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @BazZReviews. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 759,596 of 1,628,927entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 24 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“BazZ reviews” (@BazZReviews), 31 subscribers as measured 24 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/BazZReviews.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.