Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

Basic Fucking Kindness

@BasicFukingKindness

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

1,930subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001753972310
TypeChannel
Username@BasicFukingKindness
Created4 May 2022measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live12 August 2026
Measurements held4
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 12 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/BasicFukingKindness

Growth

1,9281,9301,9296 August 2026 — 1,930 subscribers6 August 2026 — 1,930 subscribers10 August 2026 — 1,928 subscribers12 August 2026 — 1,930 subscribers6 August 202612 August 2026
4 measurements spanning 6 days. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 1,928–1,930 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
12 Aug 2026, 20:031,930+2
10 Aug 2026, 05:501,928-2
6 Aug 2026, 11:311,930no change
6 Aug 2026, 10:041,930first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 25 December 2025the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 2 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 29 April 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

2,033 reactions across 20 posts, in 17 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 39.0% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
79239.0%
💯65932.4%
💔1969.64%
👏934.57%
🔥783.84%
😢572.80%
😱422.07%
🥰291.43%
❤‍🔥281.38%
👍271.33%
🤯120.59%
👎80.394%
😡40.197%
🎉30.148%
🤔30.148%
🎃10.049%
😁10.049%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 2,033reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 25 December 2025 to 29 April 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

29 Apr 2026, 15:54 UTC≈2,300 views310 reactionsread 7 August 2026

unscheduled message because of reasons, this channel will no longer be active. a replacement might or might not sprout later down the line, if and when admin finds a digital space that feels more like a tool than a liability and a chore (platform issue, not user issue), but all about that remains to be seen. also, given that the chat has three different antispambot filters at the same time, as well as some custom

💔18876😢39🎉3🤔2👏1😁1

29 Mar 2026, 10:44 UTC≈4,960 views68 reactionsread 7 August 2026

"{1} "the ceramics teacher announced on opening day that he was dividing the class into two groups. all those on the left side of the studio, he said, would be graded solely on the quntity of work they produced, all those on the right solely on its quality. his procedure was simple: on the final day of class he would bring in his bathroom scales and weigh the work of the "quantity" group: 50 pounds of pots rated an

50🔥12❤‍🔥4👍1🤔1

29 Mar 2026, 10:43 UTC≈3,820 views52 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

art, perfectionism, impostor syndrome, activism [transcription in separate message]

37❤‍🔥11🔥2👍1👏1

27 Mar 2026, 11:32 UTC≈3,190 views113 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

society, humor, invisible problems "satire is meant to ridicule power. if you are laughing at people who are hurting, its not satire, its bullying" {terry pratchett}

💯7926🔥7😡1

25 Mar 2026, 11:30 UTC≈2,490 views99 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

mental health "btw that rule about not trusting how you feel after 4pm in the winter or 9pm in the summer (really we should just say after the sun goes down but whatever) is only about negative feelings. if you are chilling with your best friend drinking hot chocolate and have never felt more loved and safe, that is 100% true and you can and should trust."

56🥰26💯16🤯1

23 Mar 2026, 11:25 UTC≈2,810 views83 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

language, labels, socialization, abuse "hey i've seen this making rounds a bit but the phrase "trauma bonding" isnt about people bonding over their traumas. its a specific psychology term where an abuser purposefully hurts you and then strategically comforts you after hurting you as a way to make you bond with them"

😱42💯24🤯64👍4😡3

21 Mar 2026, 11:28 UTC≈4,010 views98 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

society, parenting, invisible problems "so many people seem completely unaware of what a genuine apology is. and thats because children are forced to say sorry on command. before they ever had a chance to process what they did, why they did it, what effect it had on others, or what they should have done instead, they're expected to say that they're sorry. and they're expected to "say it like you mean it" with no i

💯5334😢8🔥3

19 Mar 2026, 11:23 UTC≈2,810 views83 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

disability, invisible problems, mental health, chronic illness "i dont know who needs to hear this but i sure did: you can and absolutely should modify the chore/self care task if it makes life easier. sit on the floor while doing laundry. clean dishes while in a chair. sit in the shower. save your spoons. accommodate your fatigue rather than fighting it."

💯4926👍7👏1

17 Mar 2026, 11:21 UTC≈2,310 views114 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

self compassion, healing, growth "if being hard on yourself worked it would have worked by now"

64💯37💔8👏4🤯1

15 Mar 2026, 11:21 UTC≈4,030 views91 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

activism, feminism "your sister is loading the dishwashes while you tweet about communism from your bedroom. mutual aid begins at home, losers sure he's well versed in leftist theory but does he do the dishes this is such a succinct critique of male leftists who think of it as theory only & wont even get off their ass to clear the table"

💯6721👍2👎1

13 Mar 2026, 11:17 UTC≈1,820 views78 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

society, socialization "i think people have forgotten that education is supposed to be a tool to help you on your way to greatness, not the definition of how great you are"

53🔥22❤‍🔥2😢1

11 Mar 2026, 11:16 UTC≈2,620 views99 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

self compassion "hate to break this to you but if you call yourself self aware but you are only aware of your faults and never acknowledge your strengths you are not self aware. you have repackaged your self hatred.

💯6132😢6

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @BasicFukingKindness. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 872,041 of 1,160,990entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Basic Fucking Kindness” (@BasicFukingKindness), 1,930 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/BasicFukingKindness.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.