Channel
@BasedInstituto
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
1,152subscribers
-4 since we began measuring on 8 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
| Telegram ID | -1001560550604 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @BasedInstituto |
| Created | 18 December 2021 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 15 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 4 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 15 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/BasedInstituto |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 15 Aug 2026, 05:14 | 1,152 | -2 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 21:27 | 1,154 | -2 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 19:03 | 1,156 | no change |
| 8 Aug 2026, 11:05 | 1,156 | first reading |
10 posts held, back to 18 December 2024 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 10 posts for this entry, the most recent from 14 January 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
260 reactions across 10 posts, in 19 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 22.7% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👍 | 59 | 22.7% | |
| ❤ | 45 | 17.3% | |
| 🔥 | 34 | 13.1% | |
| 🎅 | 27 | 10.4% | |
| 😁 | 20 | 7.69% | |
| 🤡 | 16 | 6.15% | |
| 🙏 | 14 | 5.38% | |
| 🗿 | 10 | 3.85% | |
| 🤣 | 7 | 2.69% | |
| 🫡 | 7 | 2.69% | |
| 👎 | 5 | 1.92% | |
| 🤯 | 5 | 1.92% | |
| 👏 | 4 | 1.54% | |
| 🤔 | 2 | 0.769% | |
| ❤🔥 | 1 | 0.385% | |
| 👀 | 1 | 0.385% | |
| 👌 | 1 | 0.385% | |
| 💩 | 1 | 0.385% | |
| 🤮 | 1 | 0.385% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 10 of the 10 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 260reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 10 most recent posts we hold, published 18 December 2024 to 14 January 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Monero rompeu o ATH mesmo estando banido nas maiores exchanges centralizadas. É mais difícil vender monero agora e não tem mais vendas de XMR de papel com as CEXs manipulando o preço como antes. Corretoras como a binance tem "XMR de papel". Como a blockchain é privada, não conseguimos ver se os XMR da binance são verdadeiros. Você precisa confiar que a quantidade de XMR que a binance possui é o que eles dizem ter. R…
🙏9🗿4🤣3❤🔥1🔥1
Você confiou no adm e botou tudo em monero, né anão?
😁15👍5🙏5👎3
Um Feliz e Santo Natal a todos os membros de todos os canais! Cristo Nasceu! Alegrai-vos!
🎅27❤19🤮1😁1
SERIAL EXPERIMENTS LAIN Abertura Completa em Português - Duvet (PT-BR) Adaptação em Português: Nato Vieira Vocais, Backings - Bianca Fernandes Guitarras, Arranjos - Daniel Miura Guitarras, Arranjos - Tiago Rocha Baixo, Teclados - Leon PS Bateria - Raphael Bruxo https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=W57KhKzWzbw @BasedInstituto
❤19🔥5👏4
Sobre o eventual fracasso do Bitcoin: Será útil até um certo tempo e continuará subindo de preço, mas depois se tornará caríssimo de se manter com taxas de transferências caras para pagar os mineradores (quando o halving chegar no limite), e transações sendo monitoradas por inúmeras corporações. Tudo isso se torna insustentável para o bitcoin ser chamado de "moeda": Não tem a privacidade de um cartão de crédito mas t…
👍9🗿6🤡2❤1👀1
Como descobrir da pior forma que criptomoedas como Bitcoin e Ethereum estão destinados ao fracasso porque não tem privacidade "Segundo as informações do site, o BC concluiu que o sistema baseado em blockchain não atendeu os requisitos de segurança para as operações financeiras após quatro anos de testes. Esse tipo de rede, inaugurada com o bitcoin, registra transações em público. Há tempos o BC alertava que essa car…
🤡14👍6🤣4❤2👎2😁1
Serial Experiments Lain: Cyberia Mix 1998 Serial Experiments Lain: Cyberia Mix (also stylized as serial experiments lain sound track Cyberia Mix) is the second soundtrack for the Serial Experiments Lain anime. It acts a soundtrack for the fictional nightclub Cyberia, which is depicted in the show. Cyberia Mix was created by Chikada Wasei (JJ) and Akira Takemoto. It also features the TV edit and a remix of the openin…
🔥28👍4💩1
File, posted without a caption
👍3🤔2
File, posted without a caption
❤4😁1
30 de Dezembro de 2021. Parabens pra quem monerizou ou bitconizou todo o seu patrimonio. Quem fez isso, nem precisa ficar desesperado com a alta do dolar. Que venha o dolar a 10 reais. FAZ O L.
👍32🫡7🤯5😁2👌1
Showing the 10 most recent of 10 posts we hold for @BasedInstituto. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 318,905 of 1,478,351entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 15 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“BIT - Based Instituto de Tecnologia” (@BasedInstituto), 1,152 subscribers as measured 15 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/BasedInstituto.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.