Crypto & trading — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 94% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
Growth
62 measurements spanning 93 days, net -1,398. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 10,545–12,363 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 62
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
9 Nov 2026, 06:55
10,755
-9
7 Nov 2026, 22:39
10,764
-22
6 Nov 2026, 17:29
10,786
-14
5 Nov 2026, 15:27
10,800
-12
4 Nov 2026, 14:41
10,812
-16
3 Nov 2026, 15:27
10,828
-8
2 Nov 2026, 16:11
10,836
-5
1 Nov 2026, 16:58
10,841
-15
31 Oct 2026, 16:06
10,856
-7
30 Oct 2026, 18:58
10,863
-9
29 Oct 2026, 20:30
10,872
-12
28 Oct 2026, 18:09
10,884
-13
27 Oct 2026, 15:56
10,897
-12
26 Oct 2026, 15:56
10,909
-7
25 Oct 2026, 14:47
10,916
-21
24 Oct 2026, 17:06
10,937
-15
23 Oct 2026, 19:10
10,952
-13
22 Oct 2026, 19:51
10,965
-17
21 Oct 2026, 14:08
10,982
-16
20 Oct 2026, 07:58
10,998
first reading
Engagement
33 posts held, back to 29 April 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 58 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
15.7%
avg views ÷ 10,755 subscribers
Avg views / post
1,690
4 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.08%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
4
of 33 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 3 of 4 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 4 November 2026
Posts held
33 (29 April 2026 – 4 November 2026)
Views total
6,750
Reactions total
4
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
9 Nov 2026, 09:14 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
82
Links
78
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 9 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Reaction mix
165 reactions across 30 posts, in 3 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 62.4% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
103
62.4%
👍
40
24.2%
🔥
22
13.3%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 30 of the 33 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 165 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 33 most recent posts we hold, published 29 April 2026 to 4 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 0 of 4 posts held from the last 30 days (0%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).
The displayed DRR has been increased across all four supported assets.
stBTC: 0.18% DRR / 65.70% APR (prev. 0.16% / 58.40%)
stETH: 0.20% DRR / 73.00% APR (prev. 0.18% / 65.70%)
stSOL: 0.20% DRR / 73.00% APR (prev. 0.18% / 65.70%)
stPAXG: 0.22% DRR / 80.30% APR (prev. 0.20% / 73.00%)
Why: BTC funding stayed green all week (21 of 21 epochs, SOL 20 of 21) and all three majors pinned at the +0.01% cap into Nov 4, while…
📈 This week's DRR update rates stepped up +0.02% across all four stAssets:
stBTC 0.16% | stETH 0.18% | stSOL 0.18% | stPAXG 0.20%
Why: positive funding all week, 7 straight days of Greed, and wider SOL spreads after HK's second spot SOL ETF.
DRR is variable. When the market pays more, the rate moves up.
https://basis.pro
A second Solana ETF just started trading on HKEX, and the headlines are all about fees 0.6% vs 0.99%.
Both products leave out the same thing: SOL's native staking yield.
The real question isn't the fee. It's the yield.
Read the analysis: https://insights.basis.pro/hong-kong-solana-etf-fee-war-yield-question
The 2026 ETF Ledger Just Turned Positive
US spot crypto ETFs closed their strongest week of 2026 into the September 25 print:
▪️ Bitcoin ETFs: $2.39B net inflows, best week of 2026, strongest since October 2025
▪️ Ether ETFs: roughly $690M, quiet strength with no record attached
▪️ Solana ETFs: record $188M, every single fund positive
▪️ Combined: about $3.27B in five sessions
▪️ Year-to-date bitcoin ETF flows flip…
BASIS 🤝 Numbers Protocol
We’re teaming up with Numbers Protocol to explore new opportunities at the intersection of on-chain finance, AI, RWA and DePIN.
BASIS brings market-neutral yield through crypto arbitrage and staking, while Numbers provides infrastructure for verifiable digital and physical asset provenance.
Two different pieces of infrastructure, one ecosystem.
Excited to see what we can build together.
September Was Supposed to Break Bitcoin. ETFs Pulled $3.8B in Three Weeks.
▪️ Week ending Sept 5: $986.9M net inflows, cross-confirmed by two flow trackers
▪️ Sept 3 alone: $730.8M, the largest single-day haul since January
▪️ Three weeks: $3.8B, the strongest stretch of 2026. August was the strongest month since Sept 2025
▪️ Complex assets rebuilt to $101.3B from the $77.46B July trough
▪️ The counterweight: 2026 f…
Auto Earn is now live
Your staking rewards now compound themselves.
• Unclaimed rewards restake automatically every Monday at 00:00 UTC
• No term reset. Maturity date and booster schedule continue unchanged
• On by default. Adjustable anytime in account settings, applies from the next weekly sweep
• Minimum staking amounts recalibrated: stBTC 0.00001 / stETH 0.0003 / stSOL 0.006 / stPAXG 0.0001
• No minimum deposit…
BASIS × XDCNetwork
Two infrastructures. One vision for the future of on-chain finance.
BASIS institutional-grade crypto arbitrage & staking
XDC Network EVM-compatible Layer-1 for payments, trade finance & RWA
What this partnership unlocks:
→ Crypto yield
→ Real-world assets
→ Digital finance
The journey starts here. More to come.
BASIS × Zypher DAO
Partnership announced.
Zypher DAO is building an AI and Zero-Knowledge (ZK) powered Web4 ecosystem next-generation AI-native blockchain infrastructure and intelligent digital economies.
Together, we're exploring the intersection of:
• Institutional-grade crypto yield
• AI-powered infrastructure
• The evolving on-chain economy
Another step toward a smarter, more efficient on-chain future.
Excit…
🚀 Bitcoin just ripped +8.5% in 24 hours
BTC broke from $71,800 to $78,000 with a wick into $79,500.
$66.8B in volume. The market is alive again.
But here is the truth most traders learn too late:
riding the wave is not a strategy.
The winners in every cycle put capital into structures that pay regardless of direction.
BASIS was built for exactly that.
A yield engine designed to perform whether BTC pumps, dumps, o…
🏛 The Fed Could Not Cut. So the Treasury Blinked.
On Aug 19, hours after the 30-year Treasury yield hit 5.337%, its highest since 2007, Washington moved. Not the Fed. The Treasury, doubling long-end debt buybacks from $2B to $4B per operation.
The market answered instantly:
▪️ Bitcoin touched $70,000, first time since June
▪️ ETH +17.65% to $2,251, first break of $2,000 this summer
▪️ $1.3B in shorts liquidated as…
👍4❤3
Showing the 12 most recent of 33 posts we hold for @Base58Labs. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 9 November 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Base58Labs & BASIS.pro” (@Base58Labs), 10,755 subscribers as measured 9 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Base58Labs.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.