hello guy’s! aku jualan ipv beberapa catalogue setup ba ku yaa buat yang minat bisa check ke https://t.me/gobee12/27 (start dari sini,love♥️) bisa langsung chat aku ya di @kucinjg
❤1

Channel
@BarbieRowys
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
219subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001797845762 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @BarbieRowys |
| Description | 𔔀 · 🎀 status: in flight ₍ᵔ·༝·ᵔ₎ぅ ^ contact order ~ @Rowysbot ^ 💬 provë : @ProofBRs 🥣 results Customize : @BarowSult 👩🏻🍳 archive : @ios191 • mutual? @gqemay ♡. don't pass up the opportunity 일부를 구입하기 위해 adorable tiny items 🥨 |
| Created | Between 1 December 2021 and 28 September 2022— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 7 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/BarbieRowys |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 7 Aug 2026, 05:47 | 219 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 05:05 | 219 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 28 September 2022 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 24 April 2023. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 7 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
48 reactions across 8 posts, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 33.3% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 16 | 33.3% | |
| 😁 | 15 | 31.3% | |
| 🏆 | 9 | 18.8% | |
| 👍 | 3 | 6.25% | |
| 😍 | 2 | 4.17% | |
| 🤡 | 2 | 4.17% | |
| 🤬 | 1 | 2.08% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 11 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 48reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 28 September 2022 to 24 April 2023, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
hello guy’s! aku jualan ipv beberapa catalogue setup ba ku yaa buat yang minat bisa check ke https://t.me/gobee12/27 (start dari sini,love♥️) bisa langsung chat aku ya di @kucinjg
❤1
https://t.me/gobee12/26 promo nich
jajan ipv https://t.me/gobee12/23
yuk sisa 2 nih https://t.me/gobee12/14 https://t.me/gobee12/12
hello guys! aku jual ipv catalogue lama ku yaa #hadid bisa check https://t.me/gobee12/9 terimakasih dan semoga tertarik ♥️
👍1
»✿ sugary whisper of lullabies that sounded has began to by the entire tele-lings and brought a sheet of this transcript so that it could be spreads. additionally, thank you for your help! 📥 ♥️ a strawberries notification pop up¡! ♡◝꒰ > < ⑅ ꒱◟; a message of elation euphoria for the teeny–kitty of this <extraordinary> platform. Luscious bananas icon pinpoint a furor tidings apropos “@Whetday held a new cat…
check @spideymolk lagi ada diskon 🫶🏻 masa gak mau wm lucu lucu enih 😉
siapa yang setuju BR open lagi?
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
hi, guys! I'm open for moodboards commision with special discount. go check this out, thank you. ♥︎
OKAY! karena ada yang minat aku bakal adain giveaway kecil kecilan yap ♥️ hadiahnya adalah: 1) untuk pemenang pertama- dapet 2k saldo dana, 1 nomor telegram, 1 moodboard, 1 watermark. 2) untuk pemenang kedua- dapet 1 nomor telegram, 1 moodboard, 1 watermark. 3) untuk pemenang ketiga dapet 1 moodboard, 1 watermark, 1 wording bio non prem. syarat dan ketentuan mengikuti giveaway adalah: a) wajib subscribe @whetday …
haloo guys!! long time no see.. masih ingat sama Hadid gak yaa? aku mau numpang promosiin ba aku sekarang. Akhir bulan duit pas pas an buat jajan?? tenang aja teeenang 🙏 mampir aja ke @boominnie di jamin MUUUURAAHH... sekali lagi, MUUUURAAHH 🫶🏻😍 kisah cinta bunda corla untuk kalian 💗 terimakasih *tepuk tangan yang meriah* buat yang mau beli katalog lama ku coba tanyain ajaa🫶🏻🫶🏻🫶🏻
👍2
maaf telat dikit, terimakasih ya! aku bakal sering bagi disitu, bye bye. karena ch ini bakal segera redebut ok ok ditunggu :D 🤍
❤6
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @BarbieRowys. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
siapa yang setuju BR open lagi?
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 28 September 2022 to 24 April 2023. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Citation-graph rank — 843,338 of 1,189,255entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
@BarbieRowys named 3 handles that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 7 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“🎀 ꒰Barbie Rowy'S 🛒. . .” (@BarbieRowys), 219 subscribers as measured 7 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/BarbieRowys.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.