Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for 𝗙𝗥𝗘𝗘 𝗙𝗜𝗥𝗘 𝗧𝗨𝗡𝗔𝗠𝗘𝗡𝗧 𝗕𝗗 🔰♻️

Channel

𝗙𝗥𝗘𝗘 𝗙𝗜𝗥𝗘 𝗧𝗨𝗡𝗔𝗠𝗘𝗡𝗧 𝗕𝗗 🔰♻️

@Banglades1212

On this record: Topic · Observations · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Posts recorded as deleted · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry

16,255subscribers

-1,004 since we began measuring on 20 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002921940403
TypeChannel
Username@Banglades1212
Descriptionমনে রেখো, তুমি গেম খেলো! গেম যেন তোমাকে না খেলে👨‍⚖️ ✅🇧🇩
CreatedBetween 1 August 2025 and 31 October 2025 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded20 August 2026
Last confirmed live5 November 2026
Measurements held48
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 5 November 2026
On Telegramt.me/Banglades1212

Topic

Gambling & betting — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 99% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.

Observations

These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.

Views per post sit far below this size band

12.6 average views per post against 16,255 subscribers — an engagement rate of 0.077%. Across the 330 registered channels in the same cohort — 10,001–31,511 subscribers, posting mainly in Bengali — the middle half sit between 2.67% and 10.2%, with a median of 5.71%.

What this was computed from
Window30 days (6 October 2026 – 5 November 2026)
Posts measured41 of 41 published in the window (41 exact, 0 rounded by Telegram)
Views totalled515
Mature posts only0.081% over 35 posts read at least 24h after publication
Subscribers16,255 measured 5 November 2026
Cohortb10000:ben · 330 channels · p10 1.01% · p25 2.67% · p50 5.71% · p75 10.2% · p90 20.6%
Position in cohort0.304th percentile · 1/71 the cohort median
Uncertainty±0.178% of the figure, from Telegram’s rounding
Post languageBengali · 100.0% of the window’s posts

When this is recorded. A channel is listed here only when its engagement rate sits at or below the 1st percentile of its cohort and is at least 3× away from that cohort’s median — below it — on both the all-readings figure and the mature-only figure. The percentile alone would be circular: a percentile cut puts the same share of every cohort in the tail whatever the data looks like. The distance from the median is what makes it a statement about this channel.

This is not a verdict, and the direction is not a quality signal. A low rate has many innocent causes — audiences that read in the Telegram app without opening the channel, a subscriber base built long before the current output, an audience in a different timezone from our reading. A high rate has innocent causes too: a post that travelled far beyond the channel’s own subscribers will do it. We publish the measurement and the distribution it sits in. The full cohort baselines are downloadable, so this comparison can be reproduced rather than trusted.

Recorded under the key err_low, last confirmed 5 November 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.

Growth

16,25517,27516,76520 August 2026 — 17,259 subscribers21 August 2026 — 17,262 subscribers22 August 2026 — 17,271 subscribers24 August 2026 — 17,275 subscribers25 August 2026 — 17,266 subscribers26 August 2026 — 17,251 subscribers27 August 2026 — 17,242 subscribers28 August 2026 — 17,233 subscribers29 August 2026 — 17,211 subscribers30 August 2026 — 17,193 subscribers31 August 2026 — 17,179 subscribers1 September 2026 — 17,168 subscribers2 September 2026 — 17,149 subscribers3 September 2026 — 17,129 subscribers4 September 2026 — 17,108 subscribers8 September 2026 — 17,077 subscribers11 September 2026 — 17,045 subscribers12 September 2026 — 17,018 subscribers14 September 2026 — 16,980 subscribers16 September 2026 — 16,949 subscribers18 September 2026 — 16,915 subscribers25 September 2026 — 16,788 subscribers4 October 2026 — 16,679 subscribers8 October 2026 — 16,630 subscribers13 October 2026 — 16,537 subscribers14 October 2026 — 16,508 subscribers15 October 2026 — 16,500 subscribers16 October 2026 — 16,489 subscribers17 October 2026 — 16,463 subscribers18 October 2026 — 16,448 subscribers19 October 2026 — 16,439 subscribers20 October 2026 — 16,433 subscribers21 October 2026 — 16,414 subscribers22 October 2026 — 16,397 subscribers23 October 2026 — 16,379 subscribers24 October 2026 — 16,371 subscribers25 October 2026 — 16,361 subscribers26 October 2026 — 16,355 subscribers27 October 2026 — 16,342 subscribers28 October 2026 — 16,337 subscribers29 October 2026 — 16,334 subscribers30 October 2026 — 16,325 subscribers31 October 2026 — 16,314 subscribers1 November 2026 — 16,300 subscribers2 November 2026 — 16,289 subscribers3 November 2026 — 16,275 subscribers4 November 2026 — 16,267 subscribers5 November 2026 — 16,255 subscribers20 August 20265 November 2026
48 measurements spanning 77 days, net -1,004. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 16,102–17,428 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 48
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
5 Nov 2026, 10:0116,255-12
4 Nov 2026, 06:5716,267-8
3 Nov 2026, 09:2016,275-14
2 Nov 2026, 12:0616,289-11
1 Nov 2026, 09:5516,300-14
31 Oct 2026, 12:5616,314-11
30 Oct 2026, 09:4916,325-9
29 Oct 2026, 10:2116,334-3
28 Oct 2026, 08:5916,337-5
27 Oct 2026, 09:4616,342-13
26 Oct 2026, 06:2716,355-6
25 Oct 2026, 09:4116,361-10
24 Oct 2026, 12:3016,371-8
23 Oct 2026, 13:2616,379-18
22 Oct 2026, 12:4616,397-17
21 Oct 2026, 06:3016,414-19
20 Oct 2026, 06:5816,433-6
19 Oct 2026, 07:4816,439-9
18 Oct 2026, 05:2016,448-15
17 Oct 2026, 07:3516,463first reading

Engagement

123 posts held, back to 21 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 35 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
0.084%
avg views ÷ 16,255 subscribers
Avg views / post
13.7
44 posts measured
Reaction rate
61.7%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
44
of 123 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 41 of 44 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 5 November 2026
Posts held123 (21 July 2026 – 5 November 2026)
Views total602
Reactions total356
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken5 Nov 2026, 16:38 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
335
Videos
51
Links
132

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 5 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Video runtime
21m 29s
Average length
1m 26s

Measured directly from 15 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Reaction mix

994 reactions across 104 posts, in 44 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 17.4% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
❤17317.4%
👍15615.7%
😘14614.7%
🥰13513.6%
🍓161.61%
😁161.61%
💔151.51%
🤓151.51%
❤‍🔥131.31%
🆒131.31%
🎃121.21%
💅121.21%
💯121.21%
🕊121.21%
🤷121.21%
👀111.11%
👌111.11%
👻111.11%
😡111.11%
😨111.11%
24 further kinds18118.2%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 104 of the 123 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 994 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 123 most recent posts we hold, published 21 July 2026 to 5 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 0 of 44 posts held from the last 30 days (0%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).

5 Nov 2026, 15:52 UTC5 views10 reactionsread 5 November 2026
Forwarded from @Binary_City_Zone_BdPhoto

🔥🎰 JILI SLOT FEVER AT DKWIN! 🎰🔥 💎 Fortune Gems – Discover sparkling treasures! 💰 Money Coming – Spin into golden excitement! 🃏 Super Ace – Feel the thrill of every spin! ⚡️ 3 Popular Games • Endless Entertainment! 🔴 DKWIN – PLAY MORE, WIN MORE! বাংলাদেশ অফিসিয়াল রেজিষ্ট্রেশন লিং ✅ https://dkwin9.com/#/register?invitationCode=55282100369

❤2👍2😈2😨2👾1🥰1

5 Nov 2026, 12:18 UTC13 views8 reactionsread 5 November 2026

https://t.me/+Bh8a_ivxLvBiN2Y0 https://t.me/+qE0N2OGzUddjMDFk

🥰2😘2❤1🎃1💔1🔥1

5 Nov 2026, 10:20 UTC16 views11 reactionsread 5 November 2026
Video

😀😀😀😃🐠😀 🏆 ALL WALLET 🏆 🎊🎊🎊🎊🎊🎊🎊🎊 ✅ PREDICTION ✅ 0️⃣0️⃣0️⃣🔤🔤🔣🔤🔤🔤🔤 ❤️🐭💯🚀👑🔥🔥🔥 সিগনাল চ্যানেল লিং ✅ https://t.me/SALAAM_BIG_COMMUNTIY 🪶 REGISTER LINK 🪶⬇️ একাউন্ট করুন https://dkwin9.com/#/register?invitationCode=55282100369

🥰4😘2❤1❤‍🔥1🔥1🤔1🙉1

5 Nov 2026, 03:16 UTC21 views9 reactionsread 5 November 2026
Video

❗️❗️❗️❗️❗️❗️❗️❗️❗️❗️ 🍀🍀🌟🌟🌟🍀🍀 🌟 DK win আজকের ভাগ্যবানদের তালিকা! 🌟 🎉 অবাক করা জয়‼️ আজকে ১ প্লেয়ার জিতেছেন ৫০,০০০ টাকা ক্যাশ প্রাইজ! 🎉 💰 আরও ১২ জন সৌভাগ্যবান জিতেছেন প্রতিজন ১,০০০ টাকা করে পুরস্কার! 📢 পুরস্কার ইতিমধ্যেই পাঠানো হয়েছে — পরের বিজয়ী হতে পারো তুমিও‼️ 🔥 এক্সক্লুসিভ ডেইলি এক্সচেঞ্জ কোড:⤵️⤵️ 📍 প্রতিদিন রাত ১২ টায় নতুন কোড রিলিজ 📍 সীমিত মাত্র ৫০০ টি — আগে এলে আগে পাবেন! 🏆 বড় পুরস্কারের জন্য প্রস্তু…

❤3👍1💯1🗿1🤔1🤷‍♀1🆒1

4 Nov 2026, 22:26 UTC12 views8 reactionsread 5 November 2026
Forwarded from @SALAAM_BIG_COMMUNTIY

🔠🔠🔠🔠🔠 আজকের অফার ⬅️ ২০ জন নিতে পারবেন 💥⬅️ ১০০ দিলে ২০০ ডিপোজিট ২০০ দিলে ৩২০ ডিপোজিট যারা নিবেন ইনবক্সে নক দিন 🎁 @BDTsalambss07 🎁 ❗️❗️❗️❗️ করার লিং 🔥 https://dkwin9.com/#/register?invitationCode=55282100369

👍2❤1💊1🤪1🥰1😐1😘1

4 Nov 2026, 22:26 UTC13 views9 reactionsread 5 November 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

❤2🥰2🎃1🎄1👍1💔1🦄1

3 Nov 2026, 16:37 UTC20 views8 reactionsread 5 November 2026

EXTRA REWARD NOV 02 UID : 100369 63B644F782AF2CDCD64EAE9B09CE2BA2

👍4🤓1😇1😘1😢1

3 Nov 2026, 16:37 UTC19 views9 reactionsread 5 November 2026

NOV 02 AGENT DAILY SALARY UID : 100369 368DC879C5639359E3043FE450A7D1AC

😘3❤2👍1🤗1🤷1😡1

3 Nov 2026, 14:59 UTC21 views11 reactionsread 5 November 2026
Photo

ধন্যবাদ সালাল ভাই বোনাস দেওয়ার জন্য 🖤

❤3🥰3👍1💅1🤔1🫡1😎1

3 Nov 2026, 14:59 UTC16 views9 reactionsread 5 November 2026
Photo

Kop vai

👍2🥰2🍓1💔1🤨1🤷‍♂1😘1

3 Nov 2026, 14:59 UTC18 views9 reactionsread 5 November 2026
Photo

ধন্যবাদ সালাম ভাই গিফট কোড দেওয়ার জন্য তবে ১০০+ শেয়ার করছি ডিপোজিট পাইনি বস 🥹🫶

👍2🤷‍♂2😘2😢2😨1

3 Nov 2026, 14:59 UTC12 views9 reactionsread 5 November 2026
Photo

Thanks for gift code💓💓

👍3❤1🍓1👀1💘1😘1😨1

Showing the 12 most recent of 123 posts we hold for @Banglades1212. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Posts recorded as deleted after publishing

We recorded 5 posts on @Banglades1212 as deleted — posts this register held that were missing from the channel’s public page on two separate reads, taken from different network addresses at least an hour apart.

A deletion is not wrongdoing. This register can see that a post it held is no longer on the channel’s public page, and when — not why. Expired ad placements, reposts, rotating links and corrections all look the same. This is a count of recorded detections, not an exact total: it misses deletions we could not see, because only a post we held and later re-read inside the page can be seen to go, and it may include a small number of wrong records. How this is measured.

First seen missing
29 August 2026
Most recent seen missing
2 September 2026
Median time before seen missing
29 hours
Seen missing in the last 30 days
0

Polls

The 2 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

22 Aug 2026, 02:34 UTCAnonymous Poll43 voters

আজকে 3000 টাকার টুনামেনট খেলা হবে আপনি কি খেলাথে অংশ নিবেন

  1. হা ভাই আমি খেলাতে তাকবো😘98%
  2. না ভাই আমার সময় নাই 😢12%

The shares total 110%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

20 Aug 2026, 16:37 UTCAnonymous Poll31 voters

𝗙𝗥𝗘𝗘 𝗙𝗜𝗥𝗘 𝗧𝗨𝗡𝗔𝗠𝗘𝗡𝗧 𝗕𝗗 🔰♻️ খেলবেন বিস্তারিত জানাবেন

  1. হা ভাই খেলবো87%
  2. না ভাই খেলবো না16%

The shares total 103%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 123 most recent posts we hold, published 21 July 2026 to 5 November 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 3 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 5 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“𝗙𝗥𝗘𝗘 𝗙𝗜𝗥𝗘 𝗧𝗨𝗡𝗔𝗠𝗘𝗡𝗧 𝗕𝗗 🔰♻️” (@Banglades1212), 16,255 subscribers as measured 5 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Banglades1212.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.