Channel
@Bakhmut2022
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
2subscribers
-9,026 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001759779124 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @Bakhmut2022 |
| Created | 13 July 2022 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 19 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 14 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 19 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/Bakhmut2022 |
National news — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 68% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 19 Sept 2026, 01:01 | 2 | -8,946 |
| 14 Sept 2026, 18:19 | 8,948 | -13 |
| 11 Sept 2026, 08:20 | 8,961 | -16 |
| 6 Sept 2026, 04:39 | 8,977 | +2 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 23:46 | 8,975 | -8 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 23:27 | 8,983 | -13 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 17:47 | 8,996 | -13 |
| 23 Aug 2026, 08:34 | 9,009 | -2 |
| 19 Aug 2026, 09:29 | 9,011 | -4 |
| 16 Aug 2026, 18:48 | 9,015 | -11 |
| 13 Aug 2026, 01:05 | 9,026 | -4 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 10:31 | 9,030 | +2 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 08:30 | 9,028 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 08:26 | 9,028 | first reading |
446 posts held, back to 7 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 31 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 173 of 190 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 28 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 446 (7 August 2026 – 28 August 2026) |
| Views total | 203,301 |
| Reactions total | 2,536 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 28 Aug 2026, 15:40 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Measured directly from 124 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
5,515 reactions across 407 posts, in 39 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 21.5% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🤬 | 1,187 | 21.5% | |
| ❤ | 619 | 11.2% | |
| 💯 | 567 | 10.3% | |
| 😢 | 553 | 10.0% | |
| 🔥 | 318 | 5.77% | |
| 🙏 | 317 | 5.75% | |
| 🤪 | 256 | 4.64% | |
| 😭 | 249 | 4.51% | |
| 🤯 | 197 | 3.57% | |
| 😱 | 188 | 3.41% | |
| 🤝 | 170 | 3.08% | |
| 🙈 | 152 | 2.76% | |
| 🤔 | 107 | 1.94% | |
| 😡 | 105 | 1.90% | |
| 🐳 | 60 | 1.09% | |
| 👌 | 59 | 1.07% | |
| 👀 | 44 | 0.798% | |
| 🏆 | 43 | 0.78% | |
| 🙊 | 38 | 0.689% | |
| ⚡ | 36 | 0.653% | |
| 19 further kinds | 250 | 4.53% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 411 of the 446 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 5,515 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 446 most recent posts we hold, published 7 August 2026 to 28 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @Bakhmut2022. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 446 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 7 August 2026 to 28 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Наші потужні виконавці самі нічого вирішують, а сигналу «зверху не буде». Бо війна не в них, а десь там, дуже далеко. Та ще й дуже вигідна війна цим «зверху». Тож або народ скаже своє тверде «досить» та доведе, що майдан справжній, а не куплений, або усе в країні буде знищено. Третього не дано. По-іншому кінця цій війні не буде.
Video, posted without a caption
❗️Миру не буде: Зараз війну зупинити нереалістично — Україна продовжить воювати взимку, — Буданов 📍Справедливою мобілізацію можна назвати лише тоді, коли мобілізуються всі. 📍З насильницькою «бусифікацією» та незаконними діями ТЦК потрібно боротися. 📍Буданов заявив, що ніколи не вірив у вступ України до НАТО і зараз також не вірить. 📍Найближчим часом, за його словами, всі побачать переговори — йтиметься про технічну …
🤬2😨1
❗️На сайті Офісу президента з’явилася петиція із закликом до Володимира Зеленського провести відкриту пресконференцію за участю журналістів незалежних медіа. Її авторка раніше була однією з координаторок протестів проти звільнення Федорова з Міноборони. Журналіст Мокрик назвав появу петиції «неймовірною» подією, адже до цього щонайменше п’ять подібних звернень було заблоковано.
🤔3
Киівщина. Мат
😢6❤1
Біла Церква
😢7
Збираю «врожай» 🤪
🤯4🙏3
‼️ РФ вдарила по одному з будівельних магазинів в Павлограді, — ОВА
😱9
❗️В «АТБ» ввели ліміти на популярні продукти. В одному чеку можна купити не більше ніж 6 кг товарів. Крім того, обмежили продаж круп, макаронів, цукру, олії, консервів та інших продуктів. Обмеження діють як у магазинах, так і при онлайн-замовленнях.
😎6🤪2
Прикол в тому, що нас вигнали на вулицю і ми в цей момент просто усі стояли на майданчику перед супермаркетом. Присіли майже усі.
😡9😱5😢2
Виходжу, значить, я з «Сільпо» 😵💫…
😱7😢2
Рос.паблик
🤯12🤝2😐1
Showing the 12 most recent of 446 posts we hold for @Bakhmut2022. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 19 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Bakhmut2022” (@Bakhmut2022), 2 subscribers as measured 19 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Bakhmut2022.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.