Education โ a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channelโs own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 94% confidence. This is a modelโs judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured โ it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
Growth
58 measurements spanning 91 days, net +2,761. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between โ snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean โno change observedโ, never โinterpolatedโ. The vertical axis spans 17,243โ21,809 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log โ every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 58
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
6 Nov 2026, 17:17
21,244
-10
5 Nov 2026, 15:29
21,254
-28
4 Nov 2026, 13:18
21,282
+311
3 Nov 2026, 14:35
20,971
-19
2 Nov 2026, 16:46
20,990
+50
1 Nov 2026, 13:38
20,940
+374
31 Oct 2026, 11:47
20,566
-20
30 Oct 2026, 08:55
20,586
+6
29 Oct 2026, 09:11
20,580
+12
27 Oct 2026, 10:29
20,568
+304
26 Oct 2026, 09:57
20,264
+34
25 Oct 2026, 10:11
20,230
+38
24 Oct 2026, 12:39
20,192
+370
23 Oct 2026, 10:25
19,822
-38
22 Oct 2026, 08:37
19,860
-25
21 Oct 2026, 04:59
19,885
+387
20 Oct 2026, 01:47
19,498
-23
19 Oct 2026, 04:57
19,521
-34
18 Oct 2026, 02:58
19,555
-17
17 Oct 2026, 00:28
19,572
first reading
Engagement
276 posts held, back to 4 August 2026 โ the reader has not yet reached the start of this channelโs public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 65 pages of Telegramโs post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR ยท 30 days
2.41%
avg views รท 21,244 subscribers
Avg views / post
511
26 posts measured
Reaction rate
3.40%
reactions รท views ยท ER floor
Posts in window
26
of 276 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) รท views โ note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegramโs public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days ยท latest post in window 6 November 2026
Posts held
276 (4 August 2026 โ 6 November 2026)
Views total
13,297
Reactions total
452
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface โ not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
7 Nov 2026, 05:09 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than โcorrectingโ the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form โ 8.12K, 3.7M โ so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded โ read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
โ15,700
Videos
โ869
Links
โ3,710
Lifetime counters from Telegramโs own channel header, read 7 November 2026 โ not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked โ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it โ t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so โ142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Video runtime
7m 11s
Average length
25s
Measured directly from 17 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel โ not this channelโs whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegramโs own rounded chrome, so it carries no โ mark.
Reaction mix
2,103 reactions across 262 posts, in 18 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 40.4% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
โค
849
40.4%
๐คฃ
339
16.1%
๐ญ
243
11.6%
โคโ๐ฅ
188
8.94%
๐
119
5.66%
๐ฅฐ
108
5.14%
๐
69
3.28%
๐ข
46
2.19%
๐ฏ
29
1.38%
๐
28
1.33%
๐
27
1.28%
๐
27
1.28%
โก
11
0.523%
๐
9
0.428%
๐
4
0.19%
๐
4
0.19%
๐ซก
2
0.095%
๐ค
1
0.048%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities โ ๐ is thanks in one channel and mourning in another โ so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one โ 4.34K, 1.2M โ so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 262 of the 276 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegramโs own count on each post โ not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above โ those same posts carry 2,103 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by โa reaction total printed elsewhere on the pageโ.
Measured over the 276 most recent posts we hold, published 4 August 2026 to 6 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
Telegramโs own โeditedโ marker: 11 of 26 posts held from the last 30 days (42.3%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before โ this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).
Showing the 12 most recent of 276 posts we hold for @Bac_bissan_DZ. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked โ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it โ t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so โ1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Posts edited after publishing
@Bac_bissan_DZ edited 1 post after it first published โ the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too โ this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
First edit seen
8 August 2026
Most recent edit
8 August 2026
Posts recorded as deleted after publishing
We recorded 2 posts on @Bac_bissan_DZ as deleted โ posts this register held that were missing from the channelโs public page on two separate reads, taken from different network addresses at least an hour apart.
A deletion is not wrongdoing. This register can see that a post it held is no longer on the channelโs public page, and when โ not why. Expired ad placements, reposts, rotating links and corrections all look the same. This is a count of recorded detections, not an exact total: it misses deletions we could not see, because only a post we held and later re-read inside the page can be seen to go, and it may include a small number of wrong records. How this is measured.
First seen missing
4 November 2026
Most recent seen missing
6 November 2026
Median time before seen missing
16 hours
Seen missing in the last 30 days
2
Polls
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A pollโs figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only โ there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each optionโs share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each optionโs own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 276 most recent posts we hold, published 4 August 2026 to 6 November 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind โ an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results โ and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 1 registered channel โ every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched โ that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting todayโs namer to yesterdayโs owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason โ naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides โ the โNamed by N registered channelsโ figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Handles this channel named that no longer answer
Dead references
1
handles named in this channelโs posts, vacant today
Evidenced gone
1
we ourselves saw one of these resolve, at some point
Never seen alive
0
vacant every time we have ever looked
@Bac_bissan_DZ named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handleโs history โ see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all. A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today โ not that anything โdiedโ. How this is measured.
Evidenced gone
We ourselves saw each of these resolve to a real page at some point before it went vacant โ a genuine, evidenced change, not an inference from absence.
@italiano_con_marry named in 2 posts, 8 August 2026 โ 9 August 2026 ยท confirmed gone 14 October 2026 (two independent sightings โ see how we confirm a dead handle)evidenced
Appears in Telegramโs recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly โ each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone elseโs query is independent of having been queried itself.
ุฃุณุทูุฑุฉ ุงูุจุงู DZ ๐ฉ๐ฟ๐ @bac_bac_dz ยท 30,511 Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 63 here โ alongside 62 others โ read 13 September 2026
๐๐ข๐ซ๐โ๐ฌ ๐๐๐๐ฆ | ๐๐๐ ๐๐๐7 @BAC_WITH_EIRA ยท 20,921 Telegram ranks this channel #6 of 69 here โ alongside 68 others โ read 3 October 2026
AYA AYA 897 (BAC) @AYA_AYA_897_bac ยท 21,155 Telegram ranks this channel #17 of 73 here โ alongside 72 others โ read 20 September 2026
ุงูุฃุณุชุงุฐ ูุนุฌุงู ุดุงูุฑ - ุนููู ููุฒูุงุฆูุฉ @Prof_LaadjalChaher ยท 33,239 Telegram ranks this channel #21 of 82 here โ alongside 81 others โ read 7 September 2026
๐ฆ๐ง๐จ๐๐ฌ ๐๐๐ฅ๐ ๐ง @studyhard_dz ยท 25,470 Telegram ranks this channel #22 of 69 here โ alongside 68 others โ read 19 September 2026
ููุงุฉ ุงูุฃุณุชุงุฐ ุนุจุฏ ุงูุจุงุณุท @bassetprof ยท 81,489 Telegram ranks this channel #24 of 84 here โ alongside 83 others โ read 28 August 2026
ู ุงุณููุง ููุนููู Bac2027 @massika_bac2027 ยท 20,952 Telegram ranks this channel #26 of 65 here โ alongside 64 others โ read 26 September 2026
ุฃุณุชุงุฐุฉ ุงูุฃุฏุจ ุงูุนุฑุจู @profnourbac2025 ยท 26,338 Telegram ranks this channel #27 of 75 here โ alongside 74 others โ read 13 September 2026
๐๐๐๐ ๐๐๐ณ๐๐๐๐๐ณ๐ ๐ฌ๐ง๐ @bacwithselsabilez ยท 34,262 Telegram ranks this channel #28 of 75 here โ alongside 74 others โ read 10 September 2026
ANYA BAC 2027๐๐ @studywithanyaaa ยท 34,187 Telegram ranks this channel #30 of 80 here โ alongside 79 others โ read 5 September 2026
ููุงุฉ ุงูุฃุณุชุงุฐ ู ุญู ุฏ ุงูุฃู ูู ุฒุฏูู @amine_zeddoun ยท 94,589 Telegram ranks this channel #30 of 80 here โ alongside 79 others โ read 28 August 2026
๐ฆ๐๐๐ฑ๐ฒ๐ป๐๐ ๐๐ฎ๐ฐ ๐ฎ๐ฌ๐ฎ๐ณ @rraaaayhh ยท 27,679 Telegram ranks this channel #40 of 79 here โ alongside 78 others โ read 15 September 2026
ุจูุงููุฑูุง BAC DZ TOP @bac_dztop ยท 52,198 Telegram ranks this channel #43 of 76 here โ alongside 75 others โ read 28 August 2026
Bac 2027 @bac2021youcan ยท 37,825 Telegram ranks this channel #49 of 70 here โ alongside 69 others โ read 2 September 2026
infinity โพ๏ธ BAC @infinitybac20 ยท 76,018 Telegram ranks this channel #57 of 81 here โ alongside 80 others โ read 28 August 2026
Bac with ilyes 2027 @bac2029 ยท 50,873 Telegram ranks this channel #63 of 76 here โ alongside 75 others โ read 28 August 2026
BAC WITH NOUUR ๐ฉ๐ปโ๐ป! @NOURCHANNE ยท 20,769 Telegram ranks this channel #68 of 80 here โ alongside 79 others โ read 25 September 2026
This channel appears in 18 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total, of which the 17 where it ranks highest are shown above. Each is Telegramโs list for THAT channel, not this one โ see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 6 November 2026 โ this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
โBACโ27 | Education DZ ๐ฉ๐ฟ๐โ (@Bac_bissan_DZ), 21,244 subscribers as measured 6 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Bac_bissan_DZ.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV ยท JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.