Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for BabyPoochain news

Channel

BabyPoochain news

@BabyPoochain_ann

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry

2subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001548045470
TypeChannel
Username@BabyPoochain_ann
CreatedBetween 1 August 2021 and 24 July 2022 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded13 August 2026
Last confirmed live30 October 2026
Measurements held2
On Telegramt.me/BabyPoochain_ann

Growth

27 August 2026 — 2 subscribers13 August 2026 — 2 subscribers7 August 202613 August 2026
2 measurements spanning 7 days. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 1–3 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
13 Aug 2026, 20:502no change
7 Aug 2026, 06:572first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 24 July 2022 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 26 July 2022. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Photos
5
Links
13

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 13 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Reaction mix

36 reactions across 8 posts, in 4 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 58.3% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
🔥2158.3%
👍1336.1%
👏12.78%
🥰12.78%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 8 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 36 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 24 July 2022 to 26 July 2022, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

26 Jul 2022, 05:03 UTC173 views4 reactionsread 13 August 2026

💴 Poo Cash 📌CHECK ALL PINS BEFORE PANIC! ⚠️BEFORE ENTRY, DM THE DEVELOPER INSTEAD OF BRINGING PRIOR CONCERNS TO REDUCE ANY PANIC OF NEW HOLDER PLEASE @binadev 🦺WE ARE SAFU https://t.me/PooChainCash

🔥4

26 Jul 2022, 02:48 UTC149 viewsread 13 August 2026

Our UI to staking I will have up soon guys. Not sure it will be functioning in the next hour, but the Interface will be present.

25 Jul 2022, 12:11 UTC203 viewsread 13 August 2026

everyone DM @DannyLovespizza SEND HIM THIS ⛓ 💩Baby Poo Chain ⛓ 💩 THE ONLY REAL BABY POO CHAIN 1️⃣FIRST BABY OF THE TREND. 🦺 SAFE TEAM 🎁 REWARDS 🔗 UTILITY 💩 POOCHAIN 🆙 GOING TO PUMP 📉 SMART MARKETING 🔐 Locked 122 years 🟢 SAFE CA Website - https://Babypoochain.com Telegram - @babypoochain

25 Jul 2022, 11:32 UTC146 viewsread 13 August 2026

https://twitter.com/babypoochain/status/1551530627438182400 Everyone seeing this Retweet, comment, and Follow if you are not yet!

25 Jul 2022, 09:53 UTC36 views8 reactionsread 13 August 2026
Photo

Groups 🌍 Global - @Babypoochain 🇨🇳 China - @babypoochain_china 🇹🇷 Turkey @BabyPooChain_turkey ⛓ 💩Baby Poo Chain ⛓ 💩 THE ONLY REAL BABY POO CHAIN 1️⃣FIRST BABY OF THE TREND. 🦺 SAFE TEAM 🎁 REWARDS 🔗 UTILITY 💩 POOCHAIN 🆙 GOING TO PUMP 📉 SMART MARKETING 🔐 Locked 122 years 🟢 SAFE CA Website - https://Babypoochain.com Telegram - @babypoochain Now 10 k mcap

👍8

25 Jul 2022, 07:01 UTC112 viewsread 13 August 2026

Raid this ;) Made us one , Because we are gonna explode today, tomorrow whenever, But join guys, Safe posts Only, and well it's ours! https://t.me/Babypoochain_calls/3

25 Jul 2022, 06:20 UTC121 views4 reactionsread 13 August 2026
Photo

Funny story guys... So a guy named crypto x joins today, and I immediately ban assuming he is the infamous one who spams projects.. he dm'd me saying that he only wants to help, I was much in disbelief, I came to the conclusion he is the REAL ONE, The spammer one fakes him, HE KNOWS THE DEV OF POOCHAIN

🔥3👏1

25 Jul 2022, 06:09 UTC101 viewsread 13 August 2026

Raid this ;) Made us one , Because we are gonna explode today, tomorrow whenever, But join guys, Safe posts Only, and well it's ours! https://t.me/Babypoochain_calls/3

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @BabyPoochain_ann. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

24 Jul 2022, 22:40 UTCAnonymous Poll50 voters

Baby PooChain NFT's ?

  1. Bullish66%
  2. Let's Do it.12%
  3. 50/5022%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 24 July 2022 to 26 July 2022. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Mentions

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“BabyPoochain news” (@BabyPoochain_ann), 2 subscribers as measured 13 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/BabyPoochain_ann.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.