https://www.anthropic.com/research/glasswing-initial-update
💯1

Channel
@BabyCornInverseIndicator
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Cite this entry
419subscribers
-7 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001682730664 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @BabyCornInverseIndicator |
| Created | Between 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 11 October 2026 |
| Measurements held | 6 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 2 times, most recently 11 October 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/BabyCornInverseIndicator |
Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 21 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 30 Sept 2026, 20:57 | 419 | -4 |
| 9 Sept 2026, 05:19 | 423 | -1 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 07:16 | 424 | -1 |
| 14 Aug 2026, 21:16 | 425 | -1 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 05:20 | 426 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 09:02 | 426 | first reading |
18 posts held, back to 5 February 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 18 posts for this entry, the most recent from 23 May 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
82 reactions across 16 posts, in 13 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 42.7% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 😭 | 35 | 42.7% | |
| 🌭 | 12 | 14.6% | |
| ❤ | 10 | 12.2% | |
| 🔥 | 6 | 7.32% | |
| 😢 | 5 | 6.10% | |
| 😱 | 5 | 6.10% | |
| 🥰 | 3 | 3.66% | |
| 👍 | 1 | 1.22% | |
| 💔 | 1 | 1.22% | |
| 💯 | 1 | 1.22% | |
| 😁 | 1 | 1.22% | |
| 🤡 | 1 | 1.22% | |
| 🤪 | 1 | 1.22% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 17 of the 18 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 82 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 18 most recent posts we hold, published 5 February 2026 to 23 May 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
https://www.anthropic.com/research/glasswing-initial-update
💯1
Just want to share my pizza 🍕
🔥6❤1💔1
TL;DR - A real Litecoin $LTC chain reorganization happened on 2026-04-25, spanning at least 5 block heights (3095939 → 3095943). - The attacker made 4 $LTC bridge deposits to Aurora's $NEAR omni-bridge, totalling 36,124 $LTC ≈ $2.0M USD. - After the reorg, the 4 underlying $LTC deposit transactions no longer exist on the canonical chain (they were orphaned). The attacker now holds both the original LTC (still unspent…
$BTC is about to rebound to 80K.😭 The forced sale of my $BTC felt like a precision snipe.😭
😢1
2026 so far
❤1
https://x.com/i/status/2044139089289720275 I hope this isn’t about me, Boss Since I’ve never actually been to the office.😂
🤪1
Signed Moo Moo Bull | Assistant in G₿C venture
I was just chatting with a friend about "How do you make Claude smarter?" I think how "smart" it appears depends on the methods you use and what problems you're trying to solve. For example, if you use the logic for "handling everyday emails" to do "data organization and report generation," the agent will seem pretty dumb. That's why we need to customize Claude's setup for our own specific situation. But this can …
❤3😢1
Time to be monke folks
😱5
an agent runs for more than 1d 5hrs ... interesting
🥰3👍1
Sticker, posted without a caption
https://x.com/GiantBabyCorn/status/2040600792877686845 -- Introducing to "Lazy Prompt". https://lazy-prompt.giantbabycorn.finance You can generate your prompts in just a few clicks and bridge them instantly to your favorite AI providers.
❤4
It seem like you can get some free Claude token right now. But ironically, I got the "failed to grant credit" thing😭 https://support.claude.com/en/articles/14246053-extra-usage-credit-for-pro-max-and-team-plans
🌭2🤡1
Showing the 12 most recent of 18 posts we hold for @BabyCornInverseIndicator. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 30 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“玉米損🌽反一資訊” (@BabyCornInverseIndicator), 419 subscribers as measured 30 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/BabyCornInverseIndicator.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.