Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for BabyFood

Channel

BabyFood

@Babies_Food

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

2,480subscribers

-8 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001119960269
TypeChannel
Username@Babies_Food
CreatedBetween 1 May 2017 and 31 August 2020— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live16 August 2026
Measurements held6
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 16 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/Babies_Food

Growth

2,4802,4882,4846 August 2026 — 2,488 subscribers6 August 2026 — 2,488 subscribers6 August 2026 — 2,487 subscribers9 August 2026 — 2,485 subscribers12 August 2026 — 2,484 subscribers16 August 2026 — 2,480 subscribers6 August 202616 August 2026
6 measurements spanning 10 days, net -8. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 2,479–2,489 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
16 Aug 2026, 06:382,480-4
12 Aug 2026, 13:052,484-1
9 Aug 2026, 11:512,485-2
6 Aug 2026, 16:402,487-1
6 Aug 2026, 05:342,488no change
6 Aug 2026, 02:352,488first reading

Engagement

22 posts held, back to 27 January 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 2 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
9.58%
avg views ÷ 2,480 subscribers
Avg views / post
238
5 posts measured
Reaction rate
4.31%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
5
of 22 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 3 of 5 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 6 August 2026
Posts held22 (27 January 20266 August 2026)
Views total1,188
Reactions total33
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken7 Aug 2026, 16:27 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

116 reactions across 10 posts, in 3 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 62.9% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
🔥7362.9%
👍4034.5%
👏32.59%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 18 of the 22 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 359reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 22 most recent posts we hold, published 27 January 2026 to 6 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

6 Aug 2026, 09:07 UTC123 views5 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @nczd_ruPhoto

🤱🏼Здоровье мамы и малыша: всё о пользе грудного вскармливания 📆С 3 по 9 августа проходит Неделя популяризации грудного вскармливания в России — она приурочена к Международной неделе грудного вскармливания. 📎Грудное вскармливание — не сложная задача, а естественная биологическая норма, проверенная эволюцией. Оно помогает сохранять здоровье и матери, и малыша. 💬В наших карточках о пользе грудного вскармливания для м

👍2🔥2👏1

6 Aug 2026, 09:05 UTC118 viewsread 7 August 2026
Photo

А какова роль отца в грудном вскармливании?

4 Aug 2026, 19:06 UTC280 views6 reactionsread 7 August 2026

🤱ИДЕТ ВСЕМИРНАЯ НЕДЕЛЯ ГРУДНОГО ВСКАРМЛИВАНИЯ (А вы знали?) В первую неделю августа ежегодно во всем Мире проходят мероприятия посвященные поддержке грудного вскармливания. Грудное молоко - это не идеальное питание, это НОРМА И нам важнее говорить не столько о преимуществах грудного вскармливания, сколько о рисках его отсутствия. Известно, что отсутствие грудного вскармливания повышает риски развития, как у матер

🔥6

31 Jul 2026, 07:18 UTC305 viewsread 7 August 2026

Продолжаю👆👇 Ученые из 15 стран провели анализ более 700 различных детских смесей по наличию и достоверности утверждений и заявлений, сделанных на упаковке этих продуктов Что было выявлено в этом исследовании? 📌 Наиболее распространенными типами утверждений на банках со смесями были - «помогает/поддерживает работу мозга и/или глаз и/или нервной системы» - «укрепляет/поддерживает здоровую иммунную систему» - «подд

28 Jul 2026, 06:42 UTC362 views22 reactionsread 7 August 2026

ИЛЛЮЗИЯ ПРЕИМУЩЕСТВА искусственного вскармливания перед естественным (немного поворчу) Передо мной несколько банок детской смеси На них написано: Улучшает интеллект, развивает мозг, облегчает пищеварение, устраняет колики, улучшает сон, устраняет запор, профилактика аллергии, для здорового роста, для крепкого иммунитета, для развития мозга… И тому подобное можно увидеть на десятках банок в сотне магазинов. А где

🔥18👍4

9 Jul 2026, 17:05 UTC590 views9 reactionsread 7 August 2026

РЕБЕНКУ ИСПОЛНИЛСЯ ГОД! ✔️ КАКОЙ МОЖЕТ БЫТЬ РАЗОВЫЙ ОБЪЕМ ПИТАНИЯ ? За один раз ребенок может уже съедать 250-300 мл еды ✔️ КАКОЙ ДОЛЖЕН БЫТЬ ОБЩИЙ ОБЪЕМ ПИТАНИЯ ? (Без учета жидкостей для питья) С года до 1,5 лет - до 1200-1500 мл/сут с 1,5 лет до 3-х лет до 1500-1800 мл/сут ✔️ СКОЛЬКО РАЗ КОРМИТЬ? • в день должно быть 3 основных приема пищи: завтрак, обед, ужин + 2 дополнительных: второй завтрак (или полдник) и

🔥5👍4

30 Jun 2026, 06:12 UTC686 views16 reactionsread 7 August 2026

А МОЖНО СМЕШИВАТЬ? Как вы считаете, можно ли смешать: ❓кисломолочную смесь с обычной смесью? ❓смесь от срыгиваний и запоров с обычной смесью? ❓гидролизат с обычной смесью? ❓смесь на основе козьего молока или сои с обычной смесью? Да, можно. ‼️Смеси можно смешивать друг с другом в ОДНОЙ БУТЫЛОЧКЕ, не боясь их какой то там несовместимости. Нет таких смесей, которые нельзя было бы смешивать друг с другом. Серьезно!

👍15🔥1

1 Jun 2026, 06:26 UTC986 views20 reactionsread 7 August 2026

ЕДА КУСОЧКАМИ: Готовность мамы и ребенка. Ежедневно сталкиваюсь в своей практике с тем, что мама боится давать ребенку еду кусочками: и вот малышу уже 8 мес, 10 мес, 12 мес и более, а она все боится, что он не готов, так как: - маленький - подавится - начнет отказываться от еды - меньше съест - не прожует, так как нет зубов и т.д и т.п. И я вот, что поняла: не готов не ребенок, а сама мама не готова давать еду кусо

🔥16👍3👏1

20 May 2026, 08:19 UTC861 views4 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Уважаемые коллеги! Приглашаем Вас 21 мая на нашу традиционную ежегодную конференцию, посвященную международному дню донорства грудного молока! Несмотря на то, что вопросы применения донорского молока в нашей стране пока не отрегулированы, мы стараемся закрепить саму идею «банка грудного молока», а в наших реалиях - это пока технология «индивидуального банка», т.е хранения материнского молока в стационаре для кормле

🔥4

13 May 2026, 18:09 UTC969 views10 reactionsread 7 August 2026

УКУС КЛЕЩА И ГРУДНОЕ ВСКАРМЛИВАНИЕ Для начала вспомним, чем в принципе опасен укус клеща? Клещ может быть «переносчиком» двух наиболее часто встречаемых опасных для человека заболеваний 🔥клещевого энцефалита (вызывается вирусом клещевого энцефалита) 🔥клещевого боррелиоза (или болезни Лайма, вызывается бактерией рода Borrelia) Передается ли этот вирус или бактерия ребенку через грудное молоко матери, которую укусил

🔥10

22 Apr 2026, 12:30 UTC999 views15 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Так наши мамы хранят свое замороженное грудное молоко в стационаре.

🔥10👍4👏1

Showing the 12 most recent of 22 posts we hold for @Babies_Food. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 1,258,834 of 1,481,243entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 16 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“BabyFood” (@Babies_Food), 2,480 subscribers as measured 16 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Babies_Food.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.