5 measurements spanning 8 days, net +34. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 1,182–1,226 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
15 Aug 2026, 18:47
1,221
+25
11 Aug 2026, 23:07
1,196
+8
8 Aug 2026, 16:54
1,188
+1
7 Aug 2026, 23:18
1,187
no change
7 Aug 2026, 17:47
1,187
first reading
Engagement
20 posts held, back to 26 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
43.0%
avg views ÷ 1,221 subscribers
Avg views / post
526
20 posts measured
Reaction rate
6.80%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
20
of 20 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 7 August 2026
Posts held
20 (26 July 2026 – 7 August 2026)
Views total
10,512
Reactions total
715
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
7 Aug 2026, 23:18 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Reaction mix
715 reactions across 20 posts, in 14 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 87.1% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
623
87.1%
🙏
38
5.31%
❤🔥
15
2.10%
👍
11
1.54%
⚡
7
0.979%
💯
5
0.699%
👏
4
0.559%
🔥
3
0.42%
🆒
2
0.28%
🗿
2
0.28%
🥰
2
0.28%
🎉
1
0.14%
😇
1
0.14%
😍
1
0.14%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 715reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 26 July 2026 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
🌟 ۸.۵ سنت ژرمن دربارهٔ فناوری زیرزمینی
«سقف بلندترین ساختمانها در برخی نقاط، کاملاً ۱۲۵ فوت زیر سطح قرار دارد…»
این جملهٔ کوتاه از کتاب The Magic Presence نقل شده است، و در ادامهٔ آن سنت ژرمن تصویری از شکوه فناوریهای زیرزمینی ارائه میدهد—فناوریهایی که در سکوت و دور از دید سطح، به کمال رسیدهاند.
در بازآفرینیِ کامل این بخش:
سنت ژرمن توضیح میدهد که در شهرهای زیرزمینی، سامانههای تهویهٔ طبیعی بهگونهای طراحی شده…
🌟 ۸.۴ پرسش: چه نوع فناوریای دارید؟
بدانید که تلوس چندان از شما دور نیست. ما تنها یک مایل یا اندکی بیشتر زیر سطح زمین قرار داریم. زمین رسانایی عظیم است، و اندیشههای تلهپاتیک شما بهراحتی از لایههای زمین عبور میکند و هر زمان که بخواهید با ما ارتباط برقرار کنید، به ما میرسد.
به الگوهای نامنظم آبوهوا بر سطح توجه کنید—اینکه یک روز آفتابی و روشن است و روز بعد سرد، طوفانی و پر باد. این تغییرات نامنظم بهدلیل انتقال…
🌟 ۸.۳ پرسش: منبع آب شما از کجاست؟
اقیانوس بزرگ اطلس، نیروی حیات را از اقیانوسهای درونی به سواحل شما میآورد. هنگامی که شما نیروی آن را استنشاق میکنید، انرژی را به بدن خود و به زمین منتقل میکنید. این همان نیروی عظیم زندگی است؛ نیرویی که موجهایش پیوسته سواحل شما را مینوازد.
در تلوس، ما از همین انرژیِ اقیانوسهای درونی استفاده میکنیم—آبی که در سراسر زمین جریان دارد و به رودها، دریاچهها و غارهای زیرزمینی ما میر…
🌿 تکنیک سهصحنۀ سیلوا
▪️ فایل پیدیاف موبایلی
▪️ فایل پیدیاف
در این فایلهای پیدیاف 👆 ترجمۀ صحبتهای «اِد برند جونیور» را میخوانید.
او دربارۀ تکنیک سهصحنۀ سیلوا و نیز بسیاری چیزهای دیگر سخن میگوید.
پس از آنکه با تکنیک سهصحنۀ سیلوا آشنا شدید، میتوانید با گوش سپردن به این فایل صوتی، آن را به کار بگیرید.
با تکنیک سهصحنه به سطوح عمیقتری از ذهنتان وارد میشوید. هر بار که در این سطوح ذهنی کار میکنید، تا…
🌟 ۸.۲ ما از کریستالها برای پیمایش درون کرهٔ زمین استفاده میکنیم
ما چیزی داریم که شما شاید آن را «سپر شفاف» بنامید. جوّ ما بهوسیلهٔ نور اندیشههایمان محافظت میشود—اندیشههایی که همیشه با خدا و زمین در هماهنگیاند. افکار ما لایهای محافظ پیرامون ما ایجاد میکنند که عناصر را متعادل میسازد و کمال اقلیم ما را پدید میآورد. ما از کریستالها برای پیمایش درون کرهٔ زمین استفاده میکنیم. ما کریستالها را...
🌱 ادامۀ ای…
🌟 ۸. ساختمانها و فناوری
۸.۱ خانههای ما گردند
«ما برادران و خواهران شما هستیم که مستقیماً از تلوس—شهر زیرزمینی زیر کوه شَستا در کالیفرنیا—با شما ارتباط برقرار میکنیم. اکنون دیگر همهٔ شما از مکان ما آگاهید، و ما اندیشههای خود را بهسوی شما بر سطح زمین میفرستیم. ما هر روز عشق خود را بهسوی شما میتابانیم، در حالی که شما درگیر کارهای روزمرهٔ خود هستید و برای بقا تلاش میکنید. ما نیز کارهای روزانهٔ خود را انجام مید…
🌟 ۷.۳ ما از مالیات بر درآمد آزادیم
«ما حاکمیت شما و خواستتان برای رهایی از مالیات بر درآمد را به رسمیت میشناسیم. در تلوس، ما هیچ مالیاتی نمیپردازیم، و اساساً چنین چیزی حتی در ذهنمان هم مطرح نمیشود.
ما مردمانی آزادیم—هر یک از ما—و همگی بهطور برابر مسئول اقتصاد جامعهٔ خود هستیم. هرآنچه نیاز داریم یا استفاده میکنیم، از طریق نظام مبادله میان ما جریان مییابد. این نظام همچون یک «تبادل برابر» عمل میکند، بهگونهای…
پیا و کالن:
می توانید دربارهی حلقههای کشتزار برایمان توضیح دهید؟ آیا هدف از ایجاد حلقههای کشتزار، گسترش درک ما یا کمک به انسان هاست؟
لارکما:
انسان ها تصور می کنند که درک، از طریق ذهن، یادگیری و پرسشگری به دست می آید.
اما حلقههای کشتزار نیز گونه ای دیگر از آموزش هستند.
وقتی انسان ها در حضور حلقههای کشتزار قرار می گیرند، الگوهای متفاوتی از اطلاعات را از طریق بینایی وارد وجود خود می کنند، گویی در حال خواندن خط بریل…
بخشش کلید حرکت به جلو در جهان شماست؛ مهمترین شخصی هم که باید ببخشیدش خودتان هستید.
آدروندا
#adironnda #marilynharper #doubledigitology #numerology #selfforgiveness
❤45💯3😇1
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @Ba_Kryon. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 319,171 of 1,548,671entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 15 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“با کرایون” (@Ba_Kryon), 1,221 subscribers as measured 15 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Ba_Kryon.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.