冰心地铁账号通知: 目前扫码系统已关闭维护 我们正在适配4.7新赛季 在地铁上架前会正式更新 请敬请期待 谢谢您的理解
👍44
Signed 颜如玉

Channel
@BYBXYYDS
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Posts recorded as deleted · Citations · Cite this entry
36,571subscribers
-1,734 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002017123956 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @BYBXYYDS |
| Description | 主营PUBGM地铁账号 以及框架免费更新 合作联系 @STARTS688 |
| Created | 16 January 2024 — measured — dated from the channel’s first post |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 11 November 2026 |
| Measurements held | 64 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 11 November 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/BYBXYYDS |
Gaming — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 9 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 86% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 11 Nov 2026, 02:18 | 36,571 | +15 |
| 9 Nov 2026, 07:47 | 36,556 | +12 |
| 7 Nov 2026, 20:46 | 36,544 | -14 |
| 6 Nov 2026, 21:35 | 36,558 | -17 |
| 5 Nov 2026, 19:49 | 36,575 | -11 |
| 4 Nov 2026, 19:59 | 36,586 | -25 |
| 3 Nov 2026, 23:19 | 36,611 | -10 |
| 3 Nov 2026, 00:16 | 36,621 | +3 |
| 1 Nov 2026, 22:36 | 36,618 | +27 |
| 1 Nov 2026, 00:06 | 36,591 | -1 |
| 29 Oct 2026, 20:01 | 36,592 | -17 |
| 28 Oct 2026, 16:40 | 36,609 | +7 |
| 27 Oct 2026, 15:20 | 36,602 | -9 |
| 26 Oct 2026, 15:46 | 36,611 | -24 |
| 25 Oct 2026, 15:08 | 36,635 | +29 |
| 24 Oct 2026, 16:29 | 36,606 | +13 |
| 23 Oct 2026, 18:10 | 36,593 | +6 |
| 22 Oct 2026, 21:16 | 36,587 | -41 |
| 21 Oct 2026, 16:55 | 36,628 | -21 |
| 20 Oct 2026, 15:09 | 36,649 | first reading |
55 posts held, back to 16 January 2024 — the reader has reached the start of this channel’s public history, so this is the full archive Telegram still exposes. Read across 185 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 11 November 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 55 (16 January 2024 – 11 November 2026) |
| Views total | 25,948 |
| Reactions total | 770 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 12 Nov 2026, 03:17 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 12 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Measured directly from 8 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
2,159 reactions across 52 posts, in 14 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 73.0% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👍 | 1,575 | 73.0% | |
| 🤔 | 242 | 11.2% | |
| 🤡 | 169 | 7.83% | |
| 😡 | 44 | 2.04% | |
| 👎 | 42 | 1.95% | |
| 🤩 | 30 | 1.39% | |
| ⚡ | 13 | 0.602% | |
| 👌 | 13 | 0.602% | |
| 💔 | 9 | 0.417% | |
| 🔥 | 7 | 0.324% | |
| 🙏 | 5 | 0.232% | |
| 🍌 | 4 | 0.185% | |
| 💯 | 4 | 0.185% | |
| 🎉 | 2 | 0.093% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 52 of the 55 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 2,159 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 55 most recent posts we hold, published 16 January 2024 to 11 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 11 of 16 posts held from the last 30 days (68.8%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).
冰心地铁账号通知: 目前扫码系统已关闭维护 我们正在适配4.7新赛季 在地铁上架前会正式更新 请敬请期待 谢谢您的理解
👍44
Signed 颜如玉
冰心官方主频道 pinned «💎 冰心4.6地铁高质量PUBG账号 ⭐ 质保30天 无观察期+无隔离+质保6小时 ⚡️ 独家接码地址 高效登录账号 💯 无需更改语言上号 独家过检测 ✅ 上号自带存款+六级宝箱+精致枪械 商品购买地址:【点击这里进入】 ⚠️ 注:任何售后问题:【点击这里处】»
福利号已上新
👍81
Signed 颜如玉
日韩服账号已补货 不会登录的联系客服
👍56
Signed 颜如玉
🤡服务器天天挨打 扫码不了的就先等等吧 毕竟呢卖这个价钱我也没利润 再加上卡网跑路 已破产 买不起牛逼的服务器 抱歉了兄弟们 或者可以先买全球服和日韩服账号使用
👍71😡5
Signed 颜如玉
怕黑屋6小时就去玩日韩服啊 日韩服又没6小时检测 教程我是录的明明白白 上不去只能说你智商太低了
👍87👎2
Signed 颜如玉
🤓打算推出跳枪号 价格不超过1元 你们支持吗
👍65
Signed 颜如玉
仅限最后200个人可以买
👍57
Signed 颜如玉
扫码地址暂时用不了了 被某些眼红狗打网站了 卖0.1刺激到某些人了 目前扫码地址已恢复正常 福利商品最后200份 仅限最后200个人可以买
👍52
Signed 颜如玉
1毛钱还害怕被圈的 赶紧给我滚 问一些有的没的 我圈你1毛钱图啥啊?是不是脑瓜子被驴踢了
👍69
Signed 颜如玉
现在就剩两种福利号 地铁隔离的话 自己去打经典 打出来观察期 地铁隔离就发解除了 1-2毛钱的号随便打出来一个就是赚的 经典等级也在20级 跟白送没区别
👍49
Signed 颜如玉
所有账号0.1白送 黑子把嘴给我闭上!
👍26
Signed 颜如玉
Showing the 12 most recent of 55 posts we hold for @BYBXYYDS. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
@BYBXYYDS edited 13 posts after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
We recorded 4 posts on @BYBXYYDS as deleted — posts this register held that were missing from the channel’s public page on two separate reads, taken from different network addresses at least an hour apart.
A deletion is not wrongdoing. This register can see that a post it held is no longer on the channel’s public page, and when — not why. Expired ad placements, reposts, rotating links and corrections all look the same. This is a count of recorded detections, not an exact total: it misses deletions we could not see, because only a post we held and later re-read inside the page can be seen to go, and it may include a small number of wrong records. How this is measured.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“冰心官方主频道” (@BYBXYYDS), 36,571 subscribers as measured 11 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/BYBXYYDS.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.