Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Любовь и страсти 18+

Channel

Любовь и страсти 18+

@BURJUY666

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

122subscribers

+2 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002478818492
TypeChannel
Username@BURJUY666
CreatedBetween 1 September 2024 and 31 March 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded9 August 2026
Last confirmed live30 August 2026
Measurements held5
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 30 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/BURJUY666

Growth

119122120.57 August 2026 — 120 subscribers9 August 2026 — 120 subscribers15 August 2026 — 119 subscribers22 August 2026 — 121 subscribers30 August 2026 — 122 subscribers7 August 202630 August 2026
5 measurements spanning 23 days, net +2. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 119–122 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
30 Aug 2026, 06:19122+1
22 Aug 2026, 11:48121+2
15 Aug 2026, 06:06119-1
9 Aug 2026, 04:17120no change
7 Aug 2026, 14:31120first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 31 May 2025the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 2 September 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
31s
Average length
16s

Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

76 reactions across 11 posts, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 32.9% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
custom 52202303267558149392532.9%
custom 52200963151862431311823.7%
custom 52223413547214079301519.7%
custom 5222262030970417649911.8%
custom 522196150351877875456.58%
custom 522203210848615456222.63%
custom 522208858730609829022.63%

Custom emoji. Every row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 12 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 76reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 31 May 2025 to 2 September 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
11
across the posts below
Posts paid on
3
of 18 we hold a reading for · 17%
Most on one post
9
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @BURJUY666. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 20 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 31 May 2025 to 2 September 2025. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

2 Sept 2025, 21:47 UTC291 viewsread 9 August 2026

Проект закрыт мне похуй Тель Хаиль

16 Jun 2025, 14:45 UTC380 viewsread 9 August 2026
Forwarded from @bezo_idiotVideo message

Video message, posted without a caption

16 Jun 2025, 14:45 UTC381 viewsread 9 August 2026
Forwarded from @bezo_idiot

Вот друзья ссылка на оригинальный ван вин! 1wilib.life?p=owre Мне лично засыпало по промокоду Bezo11 Вам советую ввести его же

13 Jun 2025, 20:46 UTC335 viewsread 9 August 2026
Forwarded from @bezo_idiotPhoto

РОЗЫГРЫШ НА 100 МИШЕК ОТ БЕЗО ИДИОТ

12 Jun 2025, 22:42 UTC263 views6 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Forwarded from @bezo_idiot666Video

Продолжение уже в канале https://t.me/+NPcg_VDQ1gcwZGIy

custom 52200963151862431312custom 52202303267558149392custom 52223413547214079302

11 Jun 2025, 19:25 UTC292 views3 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

Розыгрыш 50 мишек от Интервью Сочи

custom 52222620309704176493

10 Jun 2025, 12:13 UTC399 views11 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Voice message

Voice message, posted without a caption

custom 52202303267558149395custom 52200963151862431313custom 52222620309704176493

10 Jun 2025, 11:35 UTC497 views2 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Voice message

Voice message, posted without a caption

custom 52223413547214079302

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @BURJUY666. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 30 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Любовь и страсти 18+” (@BURJUY666), 122 subscribers as measured 30 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/BURJUY666.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.